Citizens for Amending Proposition L v. City of Pomona

Docket NumberB283740
Decision Date07 November 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
39 cases
  • Schrage v. Schrage
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • September 2, 2021
    ...423 [standing is a question of law to which we apply a de novo standard of review]; Citizens for Amending Proposition L v. City of Pomona (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 1159, 1174, 239 Cal.Rptr.3d 750 [same].)2. Leonard Sought and Recovered Damages for Injuries to the Sage Automotive GroupLeonard al......
  • Loeber v. Lakeside J. Sch. Dist.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • June 24, 2024
    ...a public entity to perform a legal duty, typically one that is ministerial." (Citizens for Amending Proposition L v. City of Pomona. (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 1159, 1173, 239 Cal.Rptr.3d 750 (City of Pomona).) It "is the traditional remedy for the failure of a public official to perform a legal......
  • Jay v. Rock
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • June 12, 2019
    ...in an effort to establish that California's public interest exception does not apply. We disagree. Citizens for Amending Proposition L v. City of Pomona (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 1159 (Citizens), a case not cited by the Jays in their supplemental briefing, provides a concise exposition of the l......
  • Jay v. Rock
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • June 12, 2019
    ...in an effort to establish that California's public interest exception does not apply. We disagree. Citizens for Amending Proposition L v. City of Pomona (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 1159 (Citizens), a case not cited by the Jays in their supplemental briefing, provides a concise exposition of the l......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Standing in land use litigation
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal No. 56-3, October 2021
    • October 1, 2021
    ...public significance, such as important constitutional, statutory, or common law limitation); Citizens for Amending Proposition L v. City of Pomona, 239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 750, 763–64 (Cal. App. 2018) (determining public duty must be sharp and the public need weighty; courts balance an applicant’......
  • Litigation & Case Law Update
    • United States
    • California Lawyers Association Public Law Journal (CLA) No. 42-1, March 2019
    • Invalid date
    ...County Counsel for the County of Solano.LOCAL GOVERNMENT / CONTRACTS Citizens for Amending Proposition L v. City ofPomona (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 1159, filed Nov. 7, 2018.Public interest standing for a private attorney general action is not defeated solely because a plaintiff may have a perso......