City and County of San Francisco v. Crocker-Woolworth Nat. Bank
| Decision Date | 25 February 1899 |
| Docket Number | 12,522. |
| Citation | 92 F. 273 |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California |
| Parties | CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. CROCKER-WOOLWORTH NAT. BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO. |
Alfred Fuhrman, for plaintiff.
Lloyd & Wood, for defendant.
The defendant is a national banking association, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the United States, and having its principal place of business at the city and county of San Francisco, state of California. The action is brought to recover the sum of $7,754.64 and interest thereon, alleged to be due from the defendant for state, city, and county taxes on personal property, consisting of fixtures and money belonging to and assessed to it under the laws of the state for the purposes of taxation for the year 1896. The defendant has demurred to the complaint, and the single question arising thereon is whether personal property belonging to a national bank is subject to taxation by the state.
Congress, in the exercise of its undoubted power, has, in section 5219, Rev. St. U.S., declared what property of national banks may be thus taxed. It is therein provided that real property of national banks shall be subject to state, county, and municipal taxes, 'to the same extent, according to its value, as other real property is taxed,' and that the shares in any such association shall be assessed as other personal property, to the owner or holder of such shares. The effect of this statute is to exempt personal property belonging to national banks from direct assessment and taxation by the state; that is, the personal property of such banks cannot be directly assessed to them by the state for purposes of taxation. That this is so is so well settled as not to require discussion at this time. Rosenblatt v. Johnston, 104 U.S. 462; People v. Weaver, 100 U.S. 529-543; Covington City Nat. Bank v. City of Covington, 21 F. 484; People v. National Bank of D.O. Mills & Co. (Sup. Ct. Cal., Dec. 19, 1898) 55 P. 685. The demurrer will be sustained, and judgment thereupon entered in favor of the defendant, the defendant to recover costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Roberts v. American Nat. Bank of Pensacola
...121 So. 554 97 Fla. 411 ROBERTS, County Tax Collector v. AMERICAN NAT. BANK OF PENSACOLA. Florida Supreme Court, ... 1877) 95 U.S. 19, ... 20, 24 L.Ed. 369; Mercantile Nat. Bank v. City of New ... York (C. C. N.Y. 1886) 28 F. 776, affirmed (1887) 121 ... 462, 26 L.Ed. 832; City and County of San Francisco v ... Crocker-Woolworth Nat. Bank of San Francisco (C. C.) 92 ... F ... ...
-
First Nat. Bank of Weiser v. Washington County
... ... regularly. (Sec. 4968, Rev. Codes; Smith v. City of ... Portland, 25 Ore. 297, 35 P. 666; McConnell v. State ... Board, 11 Idaho 662, 83 P ... was void and without jurisdiction. ( City and County of ... San Francisco v. Crocker-Woolworth Nat. Bk., 92 F. 273.) ... If ... stocks in a national bank are not ... ...
-
First Nat. Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio, v. Durr
...246 F. 163 FIRST NAT. BANK OF CINCINNATI, OHIO, v. DURR, County Auditor, et al. No. 86.United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western ... taxed in the city or town where the bank is located and not ... elsewhere. Real property of ... Johnston, ... 104 U.S. 462, 26 L.Ed. 832; City, etc., of San Francisco ... v. Crocker-Woolworth Nat. Bank (C.C.) 92 F. 273. The ... courts have ... ...
-
FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TR. CO. OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. McDonald
...v. Johnston, supra; People of State of New York v. Weaver, 100 U.S. 539, 25 L.Ed. 705 (1879); City and County of San Francisco v. Crocker-Woolworth Nat. Bank, 92 F. 273 (Cal.Cir.Ct.1899); Stapylton v. Thaggard, 91 F. 93, 33 C.C.A. 353 (Fifth Cir. 1898); Covington City Nat. Bank v. Covington......