City Bank of Boone v. Mershon

Decision Date12 December 1887
Citation33 F. 240
PartiesCITY BANK OF BOONE v. MERSHON et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of Iowa

E. L Green and W. S. Clark, for plaintiff.

Charles A. Clark, for defendants.

SHIRAS J.

The Boone Steel Barb-Wire Company, being indebted to the City Bank of Boone, and the firm of Mershon & Bancroft, of Chicago, executed to the former a chattel mortgage, and to the latter bills of sale of certain personal property. The three parties finally entered into a written agreement whereby the bank waived all claim to priority of lien on 140 tons of barbed wire then at the factory of the wire company at Boone, consenting to act as trustee in the premises. The proceeds of sale were to be credited on the indebtedness due Mershon & Bancroft, estimated to be $8,500, until paid in full. Subsequently the bank made an arrangement with Mershon & Bancroft to undertake the sale of the wire, or a portion of it. The case was tried at the May term, 1887, the main issue being as to the amounts received by Mershon & Bancroft, and the amount of their indebtedness. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $1,175.07, thus fixing this as the sum which the defendants had received over and above the amounts due them, and which amount they were bound to account to plaintiff for. The defendants moved for a new trial, and on account of the complicated nature of the dealings between the parties, and the necessity for an examination of the books of defendants, the court ordered a reference of certain named questions to the Honorable John Mitchell, before whom the parties were heard at length, a large amount of evidence being introduced. The referee files his report, in which he finds that there was left in the hands of Mershon & Bancroft the sum of $1,441.96, for which they are liable; subject however, to a possible claim on behalf of Mershon & Bancroft for $378.10, which sum is due them from the barbed-wire company, for losses sustained on wire of special sizes ordered by the wire company, and which Mershon & Bancroft had contracted for, and were obliged to take from the manufactures. This sum is justly due defendants from the wire company, but it is denied that it can be deducted from the balance in hands of Mershon & Bancroft as against the City Bank of Boone. Giving the defendants the benefit of the sum claimed, and deducting it from the balance of $1,441.96 which the referee finds was the balance...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Syndicate Improvement Company v. Bradley
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • December 22, 1897
    ...is insignificant, and will therefore not authorize a reversal. (53 Conn. 212; 30 id., 26; 49 id., 64; 2 A. K. Marsh, 450; 44 Ill.App. 362; 33 F. 240; 2 Tidd's Pr., Burke & Fowler, in reply. We insist that the judgment is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and not merely that the amount t......
  • Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co. v. Central Trust Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • December 28, 1887

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT