City of Asheboro v. Auman
| Decision Date | 21 May 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 7519SC194,7519SC194 |
| Citation | City of Asheboro v. Auman, 26 N.C.App. 87, 214 S.E.2d 621 (N.C. App. 1975) |
| Court | North Carolina Court of Appeals |
| Parties | CITY OF ASHEBORO, v. John R. AUMAN and Nora Auman. |
Smith & Casper, by Archie L. Smith, Asheboro, for plaintiff appellee.
Bell, Ogburn & Redding, by Deane F. Bell and William H. Heafner, Asheboro, for defendant appellants.
Pre-trial stipulation establish the following. The ordinance was adopted pursuant to statute. On 1 May 1973, defendants purchased a two-bedroom used Embassy mobile home, a mobile home within the definition of the ordinance. Defendants thereafter moved the mobile home into an area forbidden by the zoning ordinance and have since occupied it as their residence. The wheels and tongue have since been removed and a foundation has been erected.
Notwithstanding defendants' contention to the contrary, we hold that the mere removal of the wheels, tongue and the erection of a foundation did not raise a material issue of fact necessary to a determination of the case. Defendants' original violation was effectively stipulated. We hold, as a matter of law, that the stipulated changes in the mobile home did not change the nature of the offending use of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Robinson Tp. v. Knoll
...1977), cert. den. 344 So.2d 670 (La., 1977); Town of Marblehead v. Gilbert, 334 Mass. 602, 137 N.E.2d 921 (1956); Asheboro v. Auman, 26 N.C.App. 87, 214 S.E.2d 621 (1975), cert. den. 288 N.C. 239, 217 S.E.2d 663 (1975).It is to be noted that the facts in the instant case are insufficiently ......
-
Courtland Tp. v. Cole
...use violated the ordinance. For similar views, see Bogart v. Woodburn, 40 A.D.2d 888, 337 N.Y.S.2d 135 (1972); City of Asheboro v. Auman, 26 N.C.App. 87, 214 S.E.2d 621 (1975); Town of Manchester v. Phillips, 343 Mass. 591, 180 N.E.2d 333 We hold that defendant's mobile home remained a 'tra......
-
Barber v. Dixon
...house trailer, mobile home, trailer coach, or some such term." 19 N.C.App. at 72, 198 S.E.2d at 107. We also note City of Asheboro v. Auman, 26 N.C.App. 87, 214 S.E.2d 621, cert. denied, 288 N.C. 239, 217 S.E.2d 663 (1975), where the court upheld a permanent injunction prohibiting the defen......
-
Young v. Lomax
...were removed after the structure was placed on the lot." Starr, 96 N.C.App. at 371-72, 385 S.E.2d at 536. See City of Asheboro v. Auman, 26 N.C.App. 87, 88, 214 S.E.2d 621, 621 (where we held that creating a lack of mobility of the structure after it is installed does not change the fact th......