City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co.
| Decision Date | 02 June 1969 |
| Citation | 253 A.2d 545,54 N.J. 94 |
| Parties | CITY OF BAYONNE, Defendant-Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL NICKEL CO., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 104 N.J.Super. 45, 248 A.2d 547.
Prospero DeBona, Jersey City, for appellant (Milton, Keane & DeBona, Jersey City, attorneys, John B. Wefing, Kearny, on the brief).
Nicholas A. Panepinto, Bayonne, for respondent, City of Bayonne.
Arthour J. Sills, Atty. Gen., filed a statement in lieu of brief for respondent, Division of Tax Appeals (Charles H. Landesman, Deputy Atty. Gen., of counsel).
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division, 104 N.J.Super. 45, 248 A.2d 547.
For affirmance: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN--7.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bethany Baptist Church v. Deptford Tp.
...A.2d 192 (1988); City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co., Inc., 104 N.J.Super. 45, 47, 248 A.2d 547 (App.Div.1968), aff'd 54 N.J. 94, 253 A.2d 545 (1969), app. dism. 396 U.S. 111, 90 S.Ct. 396, 24 L.Ed.2d 304 (1969); Shelton College v. Borough of Ringwood, 48 N.J.Super. 10, 11, 136 A.2d......
-
Seegmiller v. County of Nevada
...during the year preceding the assessment. This was made clear in Bayonne v. International Nickel Co. (1968) 104 N.J.Super. 45 (affd. 54 N.J. 94 , app. dismissed (1969) 396 U.S. 111, 90 S.Ct. 396, 24 L.Ed.2d 304) in which a New Jersey appellate court rejected a parallel claim but with even s......
-
Mayor and Bd. of Aldermen of Town of Dover v. Texlite, Inc.
...in the taxing district, from Bayonne v. International Nickel Co., Inc., 104 N.J.Super. 45, 248 A.2d 547 (1968), aff'd o.b. 54 N.J. 94, 253 A.2d 545 (1969), app.dism. 396 U.S. 111, 90 S.Ct. 396, 24 L.Ed.2d 304 (1969), as that case involved the tax year 1965 and was therefore decided without ......