City of Birmingham v. Whitfield
Decision Date | 06 August 1940 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 526. |
Parties | CITY OF BIRMINGHAM v. WHITFIELD. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; J. Edgar Bowron, Judge.
Action for wrongful death by Marie Whitfield against the City of Birmingham. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
W. J. Wynn and John S. Foster, both of Birmingham, for appellant.
J. L Drennen, of Birmingham, for appellee.
This action was brought under the homocide act, Sec. 5695, Code 1923, for the wrongful death of the plaintiff's five year old daughter. Upon verdict and judgment for plaintiff defendant appealed to this court.
The complaint, in one count, upon which recovery proceeded, was (Emphasis supplied.)
Demurrers, general in form, were interposed to the complaint, asserting that the count failed to aver or show any legal duty owing by the defendant to the plaintiff or the breach of any such duty and that the quo modo of the negligence averred was set out in the complaint, but the facts stated were insufficient to constitute negligence. The action of the trial court in overruling these demurrers is one of the main insistences of error upon appeal.
Our conclusion on this question can best be illustrated by a few principles of law, quoted from the authorities, which, in our opinion, are governing.
1. "It was [is] the duty of the municipal corporation * * * to keep the street and sidewalks in a reasonably safe condition for travel and for use by its citizens and the public generally, and this duty extends to the entire width of the streets and sidewalks appropriated to such use and purposes." Birmingham v. Tayloe, 105 Ala. 170, 176, 16 So. 576, 577.
2. City of Birmingham v. Lewis, 92 Ala. 352, 355, 9 So. 243.
3. "In addition to the duty to repair, the duty of a municipality to use ordinary care to keep its streets in condition for use includes the duty where there are dangerous obstructions, declivities, or excavations in or near the street, whether created by the municipality itself or by third persons, where it has notice thereof or notice is unnecessary, to take proper precautions to guard against accidents by the use of railings, barriers, lights or the like, especially at night." (Italics ours.) McQuillin Municipal Corporations, 2nd Edition, Vol. 7, Sec. 2984, p. 201; quoted with approval in City of Birmingham v. Cox, 230 Ala. 99, 159 So. 818.
"Accordingly, the well settled general rule is that a municipality is required to erect and maintain suitable barriers where there are dangerous places along streets, which without such protection will render the streets unsafe to travelers in the usual modes by night or day," etc. McQuillin Municipal Corp., Sec. supra, p. 204-205.
4. "The proprietors of a bridge must maintain necessary guard rails thereon of a character sufficient to subserve the purpose of protecting bridge users, and are liable for resultant damages where they fail in such duty." 11 C.J.S., Bridges, p. 1109, § 72b.
5. Hovater v. Franklin County, 217 Ala. 439, 440, 116 So. 526, 527. Note, 86 A.L.R. 1389 et seq.
Applying the law, quoted, it is the opinion of this court that, as against the demurrers interposed, the count was sufficient. The negligence counted on was the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Outlaw, 4 Div. 150
...the facts so set out must constitute negligence. Birmingham Electric Co. v. Baker, 219 Ala. 324, 122 So. 316; City of Birmingham v. Whitfield, 29 Ala.App. 454, 197 So. 666. The sufficiency of the complaint must therefore be examined in this light, as well as in the light of certain conflict......
-
Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. Hartline
... ... [244 ... Ala. 118] Benners, Burr, McKamy & Forman, of Birmingham, ... for appellant ... [244 ... Ala. 119] Harsh, Harsh & Hare and Henry L. Jennings, ... Avenue, between 9th and 10th Streets, in said City, * * ... *." The fair inference is that though the count does not ... charge in words that the ... v. Rollins, 192 Ala. 534, 68 So. 417, Ann.Cas.1917D. 929; ... City of Birmingham v. Whitfield, 29 Ala.App. 454, ... 197 So. 666 ... It may ... be that we should seek for analogy ... ...
-
Opelika Montgomery Fair Co. v. Wright
...& Power Co. v. Barrett, 179 Ala. 274, 60 So. 262, 263; City Ice Delivery Co. v. Goode, 228 Ala. 648, 154 So. 775; City of Birmingham v. Whitfield, 29 Ala.App. 454, 197 So. 666. The complaint conjunctively specifies the acts constituting negligence in this case as being the maintenance of st......
-
Kopczynski v. Barger
...and diligence" required on the part of the occupier of land. Indeed, the court recognized this possibility in City of Birmingham v. Whitfield, 29 Ala.App. 454, 197 So. 666 (1940): "[T]he degree of caution which is necessary to reach the required standard of reasonable care to be exercised m......