City of Birmingham v. Jeff
Decision Date | 29 March 1938 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 205. |
Citation | 28 Ala.App. 343,184 So. 278 |
Parties | CITY OF BIRMINGHAM v. JEFF. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied April 19, 1938.
Reversed on Mandate Nov. 1, 1938.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; C. B. Smith, Judge.
Action for damages for personal injuries by Mrs. Herbert Jeff against the City of Birmingham. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Certiorari granted by Supreme Court in City of Birmingham v Jeff (6 Div. 339) 184 So. 281.
Clarence Mullins, W. J. Wynn, and Harvey T. Deramus, all of Birmingham, for appellant.
C. W Greer and George Frey, both of Birmingham, for appellee.
The complaint in this case, as originally filed, was against several designated defendants, but upon the trial, by proper orders, the court eliminated all defendants except this appellant, City of Birmingham, against whom the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff assessing her damages at $500, and judgment was rendered accordingly, from which this appeal was taken.
The cause was submitted to the jury only upon count A, which claims of the defendants the sum of $10,000, as damages, averring that on, to wit, June 28, 1936, the plaintiff, while walking along the east sidewalk of Fifty-Sixth street a short distance south of where said street intersects First Avenue South, in the City of Birmingham, she stumbled and fell into, over, or against two small metal wheels protruding approximately four inches from the surface of the sidewalk, and which wheels were partially obscured by grass growing in the sidewalk, which is alleged to constitute a defect, and the count alleges that all of the plaintiff's injuries were proximately caused by the negligence of the defendants in negligently causing or negligently allowing said defect to be or remain in the sidewalk. This count further avers the presentation of the sworn statement of the plaintiff's claim to the city clerk of the City of Birmingham stating substantially the manner in which her injuries were received and the time, day and place where the accident occurred, the damages claimed, and stating with substantial accuracy the nature and character of the injuries she received, and the street and house number where the plaintiff resided at the time of said accident.
The averments with reference to the presentation of said claim followed the language of the statute.
The claim referred to was as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Waco v. Landingham
... ... 2, 68 A.L.R. 1530; Olcott v. City of St. Paul, 91 Minn. 207, 97 N.W. 879; Krooner v. City of Waterbury, 105 Conn. 476, 136 A. 93; City of Birmingham v. Jeff, 236 Ala. 540, 184 So. 281; Id., 28 Ala.App. 343, 184 So. 278; Harrington v. City of Battle Creek, 288 Mich. 152, 284 N.W. 680; Brannon v ... ...
- John E. Ballenger Const. Co. v. Joe F. Walters Const. Co.
-
City of Birmingham v. Drummond
...we are unable to distinguish, in principle, the law as applied by the Supreme Court in its decision on certiorari in the Jeff case, supra (236 Ala. 540, 184 So. 281), and the applicable to the decision of the question we are now discussing. In Johnson v. Troy, 24 A.D. 602, 48 N.Y.S. 998--a ......
-
Allbritton v. City of Birmingham, 6 Div. 898
...the claim, its bona fides examined, and a defense or settlement determined upon. Tolbert v. City of Birmingham, supra; Birmingham v. Jeff, 28 Ala.App. 343, 184 So. 278. In the complaint, 21st Place South is described as a public street in the City of Birmingham. While a street may be only o......