City of Boston v. Beal

Decision Date25 July 1892
Docket Number2,958.
Citation51 F. 306
PartiesCITY OF BOSTON v. BEAL.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts

T. M Babson, for complainant.

Hutchins & Wheeler and Frank D. Allen, U.S. Atty., for defendant.

COLT Circuit Judge.

This is a bill in equity, brought by the city of Boston against Thomas P. Beal, receiver of the Maverick National Bank, to recover the sum of $12,096 for taxes due October 1, 1891. The assessment was made under chapter 13, Pub. St. Mass. §§ 8-10 which are as follows:

'Sec 8. All the shares of stock in banks, whether of issue or not, existing by authority of the United States or of the commonwealth, and located within the commonwealth, shall be assessed to the owners thereof in the cities or towns where such banks are located, and not elsewhere, in the assessment of all state, county, and town taxes imposed and levied in such place, whether such owner is a resident of said city or town or not. All such shares shall be assessed at their fair cash value on the first day of May, first deducting therefrom the proportionate part of the value of the real estate belonging to the bank, at the same rate, and no greater, than that at which other moneyed capital in the hands of citizens, and subject to taxation, is by law assessed. And the persons or corporations who appeal from the records of the banks to be owners of shares at the close of the business day next preceding the first day of May in each year shall be taken and deemed to be the owners thereof for the purposes of this section.

'Sec. 9. Every such bank or other corporation shall pay to the collector or other person authorized to collect the taxes of the city or town in which the same is located, at the time in each year when other taxes assessed in the said city or town become due, the amount of the tax so assessed in such year upon the shares in such bank or other corporations. If such tax is not so paid, the shares in such bank or other corporation shall be liable for the same; and the said tax, with interest thereon at the rate of twelve per cent. per annum from the day when the tax became due, may be recovered in an action of contract brought by the treasurer of such city or town.

'Sec. 10. The shares of such banks or other corporations shall be subject to the tax paid thereon by the corporation or by the officers thereof, and the corporation and the officers thereof shall have a lien on all the shares in such bank or other corporation, and on all the rights and property of the shareholders in the corporate property for the payment of said taxes.'

The case was heard upon bill and answer. The bill alleges, in substance, that on or about September 22, 1891, a demand for the payment of the tax was mailed by the collector of the city of Boston to the bank, and that on October 19th the tax was committed to him by the assessors for collection; that the tax bills bear date October 1st, and, if not paid by November 1st, bear interest from the latter date; that on ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • State ex rel. to Use of Bay v. Citizens State Bank
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 29 Marzo 1918
    ... ... banking association owned by non-residents of any State shall ... be taxed in the city or town where the bank is located, and ... not elsewhere. Nothing herein shall be construed to ... 26; St. Johns Natl. Bank v. Tp. of Bingham, 113 ... Mich. 203, 71 N.W. 588; City of Boston v. Beal, 51 ... F. 306; Charleston Natl. Bank v. Melton, 171 F. 743; ... City of Muskegon v ... ...
  • Gully v. First Nat. Bank In Meridian
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 28 Noviembre 1938
    ...the creditors to pay obligations due by the shareholders, and is inadmissible. Stapylton v. Thaggard (C. C. A.) 91 F. 93; City of Boston v. Beal (C. C.) 51 F. 306, (C. C. A.) 55 F. 26; Brown v. French (C. C.) 80 F. 166; Baker v. King County, 17 Wash. 622, 50 P. 481." We think the above auth......
  • In re Feliciana Bank & Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 25 Febrero 1918
    ... ... expenses of the government, whose protection they enjoy.' ... City ... v. Canal & Banking Co., 32 La.Ann. 157 ... And it ... may here be observed that, ... stock of a national bank.' City of Boston v. Beal (C ... C.) 51 F. 306, affirmed in 55 F. 26, 5 C. C. A. 26 ... And ... this ... ...
  • Roberts v. Gunter
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 28 Junio 1983
    ...Stapylton v. Thagard, 91 F. 93 (C.C.A. 5, 1898); Baker v. King County, 17 Wash. 622, 50 P. 481 (Wash.1897); City of Boston v. Beal, 51 F. 306 (C.C.Mass., 1892), affirmed without opinion in 55 F. 26 (1893); Cooley on Taxation, Vol. 3, § 1269, Nor does the fact that the bank maintained a rese......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT