City of Brewton v. White's Auto Store, Inc.
Citation | 362 So.2d 226 |
Parties | The CITY OF BREWTON, Alabama v. WHITE'S AUTO STORE, INC., a corp., et al. 77-263. |
Decision Date | 15 September 1978 |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Harold Albritton, Andalusia, Joe B. Thompson, Jr., Brewton, for appellant.
John L. Jernigan, III, of Stokes & Jernigan, Brewton, for appellees, White's Auto Store, Inc., a Corp., L. L. Salter, d/b/a Salter Floor Covering, Clyde Thomas, Hugo Moye, d/b/a Moye's Printing and Office Supplies, Auto-Owners Ins. Co.
Griffin Sikes of Powell & Sikes, Andalusia, for appellee, White's Auto Store, Inc., a Corp.
Bert S. Nettles and J. F. Janecky of Bryan, Nelson, Nettles & Cox, Mobile, for appellees, Southern Guaranty Ins. Co., Lumberman's Mut. Cas. Co., American Manufacturer's Mut. Ins. Co., Home Ins. Co. and Home Indemn. Co.
Thomas M. Galloway, Jr. of Collins, Galloway & Smith, Mobile, for appellee, Motors Ins. Corp.
Johnnie B. Byrd, Jr. of Caffey & Owens, Brewton, for appellee, Safeco Ins. Companies, Inc. Bishop K. Walker, Jr. of Nash & Walker, Oneonta, for appellees, Control, Inc. and William E. Bright, Inc.
Drayton N. Hamilton, Montgomery, Gen. Counsel, Alabama League of Municipalities, amicus curiae.
The City of Brewton appeals by permission under Rule 5, ARAP, from an order of the circuit court denying its request for declaratory relief seeking to limit its liability under authority of Act No. 673, passed by the 1977 Regular Session of the Alabama Legislature. We affirm.
During the early morning hours of January 6, 1976, an explosion occurred in the downtown area of Brewton, Alabama, causing widespread damage to property. During the next year, twelve lawsuits involving thirty-seven separate property owners were filed against The City of Brewton, and other defendants, seeking damages in excess of $1,000,000.00. All of the suits in this consolidated appeal, except one, are subrogation claims by insurance companies.
Subsequent to the filing of these suits, the Legislature passed Act No. 673 ( ) which limits the amount recoverable against a governmental entity for property damage, bodily injury, and death. As to property damage, § 2 of the Act provides:
By way of a counterclaim, Brewton sought declaratory relief to limit its liability under the Act. The plaintiffs opposed Brewton's claim on grounds that the Act is not to be given retrospective application and that the Act is unconstitutional. The court dismissed Brewton's counterclaim. We find that the Act is not retrospective and therefore do not reach the constitutional question.
Courts indulge every presumption in favor of construing actions of the legislature to have a prospective operation unless the legislature's intention is otherwise stated in express terms, or clearly, explicitly, and unmistakenly permit of no other meaning. 73 Am.Jur.2d, Statutes, § 350, p. 487. The rule was stated in Ex parte Buckley, 53 Ala. 42, 54-55 (1875), as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prince George's County v. Longtin
...insofar as they demonstrate a judicial wariness towards any retroactive application of a damage cap. See, e.g., Brewton v. White's Auto Store, Inc., 362 So.2d 226 (Ala.1978) (applying presumption against retroactivity to a damages cap, stating that such statutes are “excluded from judicial ......
-
Prince George's County v. Longtin, Case No. CAL-01-23689
...they demonstrate a judicial wariness towards any retroactive application of a damage cap. See, e.g., Brewton v. White's Auto Store, Inc., 362 So. 2d 226 (Ala. 1978) (applying presumption against retroactivity to a damages cap, stating that such statutes are "excluded from judicial favor, an......
-
Bd. of Sch. Comm'rs of Mobile Cnty. v. Christopher
...prospective application unless the legislature's intent to the contrary is clearly and explicitly expressed. City of Brewton v. White's Auto Store, Inc., 362 So. 2d 226 (Ala. 1978).'"Lee v. Lee, 382 So. 2d 508, 509 (Ala. 1980)."State Home Builders Licensure Bd. v. Grzelak, 705 So. 2d 406, 4......
-
STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Calhoun
...Jones v. Casey, 445 So.2d 873, 875 (Ala.1983). See also Kittrell v. Benjamin, 396 So.2d 93, 94 (Ala.1981); City of Brewton v. White's Auto Store, Inc., 362 So.2d 226 (Ala.1978). This general rule is, however, subject to an equally well-established exception, namely, that `remedial statutes.......