City of Chicago v. Meyer, No. 41117

CourtSupreme Court of Illinois
Writing for the CourtKLUCZYNSKI
Citation253 N.E.2d 400,44 Ill.2d 1
Decision Date26 November 1969
Docket NumberNo. 41117
PartiesThe CITY OF CHICAGO, Appellee, v. Karl MEYER, Appellant.

Page 400

253 N.E.2d 400
44 Ill.2d 1
The CITY OF CHICAGO, Appellee,
v.
Karl MEYER, Appellant.
No. 41117.
Supreme Court of Illinois.
Nov. 26, 1969.

[44 Ill.2d 2] Paul E. Goldstein and Marshall Patner, Chicago, for appellant.

Raymond F. Simon, Corp. Counsel, Chicago (Marvin E. Aspen and John J. George, Asst. Corp. Counsel, of counsel), for appellee.

Page 401

KLUCZYNSKI, Justice.

Karl Meyer appeals from a conviction of disorderly conduct and interfering with an officer in the discharge of his duties under chapters 193--I and II--33, respectively, of the Municipal Code of Chicago. He was fined $200 on the first charge and $100 on the second charge. A constitutional question gives us jurisdiction.

At his trial defendant, who had funds to retain counsel, chose to represent himself, refused appointed counsel, waived a jury and cross-examination of the City's witnesses and put in his own defense. He testified that he wanted to 'communicate to the public in Chicago some ideas about the Viet Nam war.' He first selected as his site for his 'Viet Nam Forum' a school yard located in an area known as 'Old Town'. However, the Chicago Board of Education denied his request to use the school yard on every Friday and Saturday evening in July and August because the light was inadequate and the yard was intended for playground purposes. When defendant and his associates arrived at the school yard on June 30 an attorney from the school board informed them that they could not use the school yard. They then moved their table, literature and banners on to the sidewalk. A police officer told them they could not erect a table and chairs on the sidewalk. Defendant testified: 'So we [44 Ill.2d 3] took down the tables and chairs and proceeded to speak there, and we held the forum that night. And there wasn't any trouble, and there were a lot of officers protecting us and watching and keeping the sidewalk clear. And we held the forum on subsequent nights--July 1st and then the next weekend--Friday and Saturday of the next weekend. In each case there were police officers there and there was no disturbance, and we held the forum.' In describing the meeting defendant said, 'A lot of people spoke and a lot of people--it's an open forum and we let anyone speak that wanted to speak'.

There is no dispute as to the events preceding defendant's arrest on July 14, 1967. About 8:45 P.M. he stood on a 5-gallon can and began his talk. There was a large sign behind him and there was a shopping cart filled with pamphlets next to him. Four or five of his associates also spoke and distributed the pamphlets. A crowd of 100 to 200 persons gathered. The sidewalk was obstructed and pedestrians walked into the street to get around the crowd. About 11:00 P.M. the gathering had become loud and boisterous. Several servicemen in uniform argued with defendant and his friends about the policy in Viet Nam. One of defendant's associates reported a fight in the crowd to officer O'Malley. Two spectators tore down the sign and a person sympathetic to defendant picked it up. A fight was about to ensue over this incident when officer O'Malley appeared and calmed the situation. Some spectators then set fire to some leaflets. The plainclothed officers finally dispersed the crowd and officer Highland instructed defendant to move also. Defendant got back on the can and said: 'I will not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 practice notes
  • Grayned v. City of Rockford 8212 5106, No. 70
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1972
    ...just the words of the ordinance, we might be troubled by the imprecision of the phrase 'tends to disturb.'18 However, in Chicago v. Meyer, 44 Ill.2d 1, 4, 253 N.E.2d 400, 402 (1969), and Chicago v. Gregory, 39 Ill.2d 47, 233 N.E.2d 422 (1968), reversed on other grounds, 394 U.S. 111, 89 S.C......
  • City of Chicago v. Morales, Nos. 80479
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Illinois
    • October 17, 1997
    ...vague standards). Moreover, this determination is consistent with our prior holdings. See, e.g., City of Chicago v. Meyer, 44 Ill.2d 1, 5, 253 N.E.2d 400 (1969) (police may arrest persons for failing to obey an Page 63 [227 Ill.Dec. 140] order to cease otherwise lawful conduct, but only aft......
  • Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sheinbein, Misc. AG No. 37
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Maryland
    • December 16, 2002
    ...These cases typically involve refusal to follow an officer's order to move or disperse. See, e.g., City of Chicago v. Meyer, 44 Ill.2d 1, 253 N.E.2d 400 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1024, 90 S.Ct. 1262, 25 L.Ed.2d 534 (1970); City of Chicago v. Lynd, 47 Ill.2d 205, 265 N.E.2d 116 (1970), ......
  • Abbott v. Sangamon Cnty., No. 12–1121.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • January 29, 2013
    ...the efforts of the police to enable his car to be towed.” (internal citations omitted)), [705 F.3d 723]City of Chicago v. Meyer, 44 Ill.2d 1, 253 N.E.2d 400, 402–03 (1969) (affirming conviction where defendant refused to obey lawful order of dispersal after protest got out of hand), People ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
31 cases
  • Grayned v. City of Rockford 8212 5106, No. 70
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1972
    ...just the words of the ordinance, we might be troubled by the imprecision of the phrase 'tends to disturb.'18 However, in Chicago v. Meyer, 44 Ill.2d 1, 4, 253 N.E.2d 400, 402 (1969), and Chicago v. Gregory, 39 Ill.2d 47, 233 N.E.2d 422 (1968), reversed on other grounds, 394 U.S. 111, 89 S.C......
  • City of Chicago v. Morales, Nos. 80479
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Illinois
    • October 17, 1997
    ...vague standards). Moreover, this determination is consistent with our prior holdings. See, e.g., City of Chicago v. Meyer, 44 Ill.2d 1, 5, 253 N.E.2d 400 (1969) (police may arrest persons for failing to obey an Page 63 [227 Ill.Dec. 140] order to cease otherwise lawful conduct, but only aft......
  • Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sheinbein, Misc. AG No. 37
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Maryland
    • December 16, 2002
    ...These cases typically involve refusal to follow an officer's order to move or disperse. See, e.g., City of Chicago v. Meyer, 44 Ill.2d 1, 253 N.E.2d 400 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1024, 90 S.Ct. 1262, 25 L.Ed.2d 534 (1970); City of Chicago v. Lynd, 47 Ill.2d 205, 265 N.E.2d 116 (1970), ......
  • Abbott v. Sangamon Cnty., No. 12–1121.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • January 29, 2013
    ...the efforts of the police to enable his car to be towed.” (internal citations omitted)), [705 F.3d 723]City of Chicago v. Meyer, 44 Ill.2d 1, 253 N.E.2d 400, 402–03 (1969) (affirming conviction where defendant refused to obey lawful order of dispersal after protest got out of hand), People ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT