City of Chicago v. Garrison

Decision Date30 September 1869
CitationCity of Chicago v. Garrison, 52 Ill. 516, 1869 WL 5484 (Ill. 1869)
PartiesCITY OF CHICAGOv.ANDREW GARRISON.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

WRIT OF ERROR to the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. JOSEPH E. GARY, Judge, presiding.

This was an action brought by Garrison against the city of Chicago. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The city thereupon sued out a writ of error.

Mr. S. A. IRVIN, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. ANDREW GARRISON, pro se.

Mr. JUSTICE LAWRENCE delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action brought by the appellee against the city of Chicago, to recover damages for injuries received in falling from certain steps that were a part of the sidewalk. No question of law is made upon the record, and the counsel for appellant asks a reversal solely on the ground that the preponderance of evidence, as counsel insists, shows the sidewalk was not unsafe, or, if it was, that the city had neither actual nor constructive notice of that fact, and that the plaintiff himself was guilty of carelessness.

As to the last point, we need only say there was not the slightest evidence of want of ordinary care on the part of the plaintiff.

As to the other points, the evidence is admitted by the counsel for the city to...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • The Chicago v. Sykes
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 31, 1877
    ...will not be set aside, unless grossly against the evidence: Morgan v. Ryerson, 20 Ill. 343; Millikin v. Taylor, 53 Ill. 509; Chicago v. Garrison, 52 Ill. 516; Voltz v. Stephani, 46 Ill. 54; Bagley v. McClure, 46 Ill. 381; Baker v. Robinson, 49 Ill. 299; Chicago v. Smith, 48 Ill. 107; Crain ......
  • Vill. of Warren v. Wright
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 31, 1879
    ...unless it appears to have been actuated by passion or prejudice: Young v. Silkwood, 11 Ill. 36; Fisk v. Roseberry, 22 Ill. 288; Chicago v. Garrison, 52 Ill. 516; Plummer v. Rigdon, 78 Ill. 222; Miller v. Balthasser, 78 Ill. 202. Where testimony is conflicting a court will not disturb the ve......
  • The Vill. of Warren v. Wright
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 31, 1878
    ...McCarthy v. Mooney, 49 Ill. 247; Young v. Bush, 48 Ill. 42; Neustadt v. Hall, 58 Ill. 172; Presb. Ch. v. Emerson, 66 Ill. 269; Chicago v. Garrison, 52 Ill. 516; Plummer v. Rigdon, 78 Ill. 222; Miller v. Balthasser, 78 Ill. 302; Wallace v. Wren, 32 Ill. 146; C. & A. R. R. Co. v. Shannon, 43 ......
  • Chapin v. Thompson
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 30, 1880
    ...would have been better satisfied with a different result, cited Morgan v. Ryerson, 20 Ill. 343; Milliken v. Taylor, 53 Ill. 509; Chicago v. Garrison, 52 Ill. 516; Voltz v. Stephani, 46 Ill. 54; Bagley v. McClure, 46 Ill. 381; Baker v. Robinson, 49 Ill. 299; Chicago v. Smith, 48 Ill. 107; Cr......
  • Get Started for Free