City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant
| Decision Date | 29 July 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 60924,60924 |
| Citation | 419 So.2d 624 |
| Parties | CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH, Wardell Chance, Doris Hunn, Myrle Johnson, Richard Mowry, and Lawrence Vanderwiele, Petitioners, v. Michael H. VAILLANT, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Andrew S. Maurodis, Deerfield Beach, for petitioners.
Philip S. Shailer of Shailer & Purdy, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.
We review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 399 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), which expressly conflicts with United Teachers of Dade v. Save Brickell Avenue, Inc., 378 So.2d 296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The sole issue before us is whether a final judgment of the circuit court reviewing administrative action is subject to appeal in the district court of appeal or whether this judgment is reviewable only by writ of certiorari. The Fourth District in the present case held that the circuit court's order reversing a decision of the Civil Service Board was reviewable only by writ of certiorari pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(B). We agree and approve the decision of the Fourth District.
Michael Vaillant was terminated as the superintendent of the Deerfield Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant by the city manager. He appealed to the Civil Service Board of the City of Deerfield Beach which, after hearing, voted to uphold his termination. He then petitioned the circuit court for review of the board's action by certiorari. After examining the entire record "including hundreds of pages of proceedings and testimony taken and given before the Board," the circuit court granted Vaillant's petition, reversed the board's decision, and ordered Vaillant reinstated.
The City of Deerfield Beach appealed to the Fourth District, but the district court, finding its scope of review to be limited when the circuit court has acted in its appellate capacity, treated the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and denied it. The district court pointed out that the controversy over which method of review is available in the district court is engendered by the use of the words "certiorari" and "appeal" synonymously with the intention of denoting a seeking out of higher review and that the type of "certiorari" sought in the circuit court here was not a discretionary review but rather was a review to which Vaillant was entitled as a matter of right. It explained that in reviewing the board's action, the circuit court determined whether or not the board provided procedural due process, observed the essential requirements of the law, and supported its findings by substantial competent evidence. Regardless of the nomenclature, the Fourth District determined, the review sought in the circuit court was effectually an "appeal." To establish its appropriate scope of review, the district court relied upon Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(B) which provides that the certiorari jurisdiction of the district court may be sought to review final orders of circuit courts acting in their review capacity. Stating that a final judgment of a circuit court acting in its review capacity is not appealable as a matter of right to a district court if it has already been directly "appealed" to a circuit court, it found inapplicable article V, section 4(b)(1), Florida Constitution, which provides in pertinent part:
District courts of appeal shall have jurisdiction to hear appeals, that may be taken as a matter of right, from final judgments or orders of trial courts, including those entered on review of administrative action, not directly appealable to ... a circuit court.
Evaluating the circuit court's judgment in light of its limited standard of review, the district court determined that procedural due process was afforded and that essential requirements of the law were observed.
We agree with the decision...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hudson v. City of Riviera Beach
...at 1563. As the court noted, Florida circuit courts “possess broad powers of review” on certiorari. Id. (citing City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624, 626 (Fla.1982)). The court further explained, “Where a party is entitled as a matter of right to seek review in the circuit cou......
-
Snyder v. Board of County Com'rs of Brevard County
...(Fla. 2d DCA 1971); DeSisto College v. Town of Howey-in-the-Hills, 706 F.Supp. 1479, 1498 fn. 1 (M.D.Fla.1989).7 City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla.1982); Education Development Center, Inc. v. City of West Palm Beach Zoning Board of Appeals, 541 So.2d 106 (Fla.1989). Se......
-
City Com'n of City of Miami v. Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co.
...review. Educational Dev. Center, Inc. v. West Palm Beach Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 541 So.2d 106 (Fla.1989); City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla.1982). The petitioners contend, however, that the circuit court, in effect, misapplied the correct zoning law to reach its result......
-
Fla. Dep't of Corr. v. Gould
...court acting in its "review capacity." Sheley, 720 So. 2d at 217 ; see Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B) ; cf. City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So. 2d 624, 626 (Fla. 1982) (holding that a final order of a trial court "acting in its review capacity to review administrative action" is no......
-
What options are available to challenge denial of a land use application in Florida?
...due process violations, and whether the decision maker followed the essential requirements of the law. See Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1982). Each party typically pays its own legal fees. “Consistency challenge” Under Section 163.3215, Florida Statutes, a request for “d......
-
Title procedure before general magistrates and child support enforcement hearing officers.
...a third determination for a case, there are no reported decisions on whether a more restrictive City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1982), standard of review applies as it does in the cases of appellate review of local government or administrative decisions. (1) Anders......
-
Which writ is which? A trial attorney's guide to Florida's extraordinary writs.
...A. Stampelos, Administrative Appeals, FLORIDA APPELLATE PRACTICE [section] 8.12 (6th ed. 2006). (8) City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So. 2d 624, 626 (Fla. (9) Pharmcore, Inc., 31 Fla. L. Weekly D2671. (10) County of Volusia v. City of Deltona, 925 So. 2d 340, 343 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 20......
-
Review of local administrative actions by common law certiorari after Pleasures II v. City of Sarasota: what's a local government got to do to get reviewed around here?
...earlier ruling in Board of County Commissioners v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993)). (4) See City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1982), Broward County v. G.B. V. International, 787 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 2001) (affirming Vaillant as the standard for a "second tier" review......
-
Conquering the maze of certiorari review of local government quasi-judicial land use decisions.
...provisions of Rule 1.630 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. FLA. R. JUD. ADMIN. 2.135. (25) City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So. 2d 624 (Fla. (26) Rightler v. Pompano Beach Police, 467 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1985) (after a petition is filed, it is up to the trial court to......