City of Detroit v. 19675 Hasse
| Decision Date | 10 November 2003 |
| Docket Number | Docket No. 238269-238338.,Docket No. 237995 |
| Citation | 258 Mich. App. 438,671 N.W.2d 150 |
| Parties | CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 19675 HASSE, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 12251 Grandmont and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 12210 Grandmont and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 12136 Grandmont and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 8063 Mansfield and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 11335 Mansfield and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 12055 Mansfield and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 11357 Rutherford and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 7734 Forrer and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 12620 Sussex and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 14302 Terry and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9337 Lauder and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 16223 Lauder and Alice Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 15461 Marlowe and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 14820 Freeland, Bell Management Company, and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 14008 Freeland, Oak Management Company, and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 14028 Ardmore and Bell Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 14304 Stansbury and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9194 Carlin and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 13949 Schaefer and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 11415 Sorrento and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 21460 Thatcher and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 16951 Chicago and T & R Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9387 Manor and Oak Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 11365 Manor and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 10010 Pinehurst and T & R Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 13940 Washburn and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 13561 Cloverlawn and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9353 Yellowstone and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 12082 Yellowstone, Joy Management Company, and Alice Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9724 Otsego and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 19431 Lamont and Oak Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 13480 Newbern and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 12762 Terry, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 20625 Lyndon, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 18535 Plainview, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 10840 West Outer Drive, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 18910 Braile and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 19448 Lyndon and Oak Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 18900 Patton and Oak Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9003 Vaughan, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 18280 Vaughan and Oak Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 18922 Annchester, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 14232 Grandville, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 19953 Ashton and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 7737 Archdale, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9636 Archdale, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 11407 Longacre and Frank Matthews, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 12150 Rutland, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9391 Memorial, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9994 Memorial and Oak Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 20500 Ferguson, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 8932 Metetal, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 8901 St Marys, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9213 Montrose, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 15016 Prest, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9414 Sussex and Oak Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 16230 Coyle and Oak Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 14261 Terry, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 14400 Lauder, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 14528 Hubbell, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 8321 Strathmoor and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 14609 Mark Twain and Joy Management Company, Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 13545 Appoline, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9379 Meyers, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 16925 Tireman, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 9317 Manor, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 8510 Roselawn and Tamarac Properties, Inc., Defendants, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 10011 Morley, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 19361 Runyon, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. City of Detroit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 20226 Pinehurst, Defendant, and Acorn Investment Company, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
Ruth Carter, Corporation Counsel, and Joanne D. Stafford, Supervising Assistant Corporation Counsel, Detroit, for the city of Detroit....
To continue reading
Request your trial
16 cases
-
Mazumder v. Univ. Of Mich.
...applies in particular circumstances constitutes a legal question that this Court considers de novo. Detroit v. 19675 Hasse, 258 Mich.App. 438, 444, 671 N.W.2d 150 (2003). We [also] review de novo decisions regarding summary disposition motions. Under MCR 2.116(C)(7), summary disposition is ......
-
Ann Arbor v. Afscme Local 369
...regarding the applicable limitations period presents a question of law that this Court also reviews de novo. Detroit v. 19675 Hasse, 258 Mich.App. 438, 444, 671 N.W.2d 150 (2003); City of Novi v. Woodson, 251 Mich.App. 614, 621, 651 N.W.2d 448 The parties agree, correctly, that there is no ......
-
Attorney Gen. v. Powerpick Player's Club Of Mich. LLC
...points out, the early rule was that the government was “ ‘exempt from the consequences of its laches....' ” Detroit v. 19675 Hasse, 258 Mich.App. 438, 445, 671 N.W.2d 150 (2003), Guaranty Trust Co. v. United States, 304 U.S. 126, 132, 58 S.Ct. 785, 82 L.Ed. 1224 (1938); see also Chippewa Co......
-
Twp. of Fraser v. Haney
...is an action in rem and, therefore, the six-year period of limitations is not applicable. This Court, in Detroit v. 19675 Hasse , 258 Mich.App. 438, 448, 671 N.W.2d 150 (2003), outlined the distinction between actions in personam and actions in rem:[A]ctions in personam differ from actions ......
Request a trial to view additional results