City of Fall River v. County Comm'rs of Bristol

Decision Date11 November 1878
CitationCity of Fall River v. County Comm'rs of Bristol, 125 Mass. 567 (Mass. 1878)
PartiesCity of Fall River v. County Commissioners of Bristol
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Bristol. Petition for a writ of certiorari to quash the proceedings of the county commissioners of Bristol in abating a tax assessed by the petitioner in 1876 upon the Watuppa Reservoir Company. Hearing upon the petition and answer before Ames, J., who reserved the case for the consideration of the full court. The facts appear in the opinion.

Petition dismissed.

M Reed, for the petitioner.

J. M. Morton, Jr., for the respondents.

Morton, J. Endicott & Lord, JJ., absent.

OPINION

Morton, J.

It appears from the return of the county commissioners that the tax in question was assessed upon a reservoir company, under the St. of 1872, c. 306, in the terms following: "Reservoir of water used to maintain a uniform supply of water for mill purposes, with the dam connected therewith, and the land under the same." and that this was the only tax assessed by the city of Fall River upon said reservoir company during the year 1876. In Cheshire v. County Commissioners, 118 Mass. 386, it was held that this statute was unconstitutional and void. It necessarily follows that the tax in question was illegal.

The claim of the petitioner, that this tax may be upheld because the reservoir company was taxable for a part of its property cannot be sustained. One sufficient answer is, that it had no property which was liable to taxation. It did not own the dam, nor any of the land covered by the pond. The dam was built at the outlet of the Watuppa ponds, which were great...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
18 cases
  • Amory v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • April 9, 1947
    ...a river is generally increased by appurtenant water power which makes the land adaptable to various valuable uses. Fall River v. County Commissioners of Bristol, 125 Mass. 567;Lowell v. County Commissioners of Middlesex, 152 Mass. 372, 25 N.E. 469,9 L.R.A. 356;Boston Belting Co. v. Boston, ......
  • Amory v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • April 9, 1947
    ... ... Eminent ... Domain, Damages. Water. River. Metropolitan District Water ... Supply ... Railroad, 4 Cush. 291. Hilbourne v. County of ... Suffolk, 120 Mass. 393 ... Childs v. New ... Brown v ... Providence, Warren & Bristol Railroad, 5 Gray, 35. Old ... Colony & Fall ... what the city paid a third person for his spring was ... ...
  • Eastern Massachusetts, St. Ry. Co. v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • January 28, 1942
    ...Iron Factory Co. v. Danvers, 10 Mass. 514, 517;Commonwealth v. Provident Institution for Savings, 12 Allen 312, 315;Fall River v. County Commissioners, 125 Mass. 567, 568;Opinion of the Justices, 261 Mass. 523, 545, 159 N.E. 55. That this provision requiring the lessee to bear the burden of......
  • Detroit Citizens' St. R. Co. v. Common Council of City of Detroit
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • February 12, 1901
    ... ... Certiorari ... to circuit court, Wayne county; William L. Carpenter, George ... S. Hosmer, Byron S ... Grand River Street-Railway Company is taxable, by virtue of a ... of taxation, see City of Fall River v. County Com'rs ... of Bristol, 125 Mass. 567; ... ...
  • Get Started for Free