City of Ft. Scott v. Kaufman

Citation44 Kan. 137,24 P. 64
PartiesTHE CITY OF FORT SCOTT v. C. KAUFMAN
Decision Date07 June 1890
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Kansas

Error from Bourbon District Court.

INJUNCTION brought by Kaufman, and many others, against the City of Fort Scott, and others, to restrain the collection of a certain tax. Judgment for the plaintiffs, on June 1, 1889. The defendants bring the case here. The material facts appear in the opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Ware Biddle & Cory, for plaintiffs in error.

J. D McCleverty, for defendants in error.

SIMPSON C. All the Justices concurring.

OPINION

SIMPSON, C.:

This case was tried in the district court of Bourbon county on the following agreed statement of facts:

"1. From and since May 30, 1888, the defendant, the city of Fort Scott, Kansas, has been and still is a city of the first class, duly organized and existing under the laws of this state.

"2. For several years prior to May 30, 1888, the said city had been a city of the second class, duly organized and existing under the laws of this state.

"3. On April 6, 1888, said city duly enacted and published the ordinance creating sewer district No. 3, as alleged in the petition of plaintiffs herein, which sewer district comprised the territory as set forth in said petition.

"4. Thereafter, and prior to August 14, 1888, said city caused a discharging sewer to be built, commencing at a point 26 feet north of the center of the alley in block 16, in Wilson's addition to said city, and running in a northeasterly direction about 2,591 feet to a point near the Marmaton river, into which it emptied, said sewer being wholly built of sewer pipe 18 inches in diameter.

"5. Said city during the same time caused to be built certain sewers within said sewer district No. 3, commonly known and called lateral sewers, built of sewer pipe of 6, 8 and 10 inches in diameter, each of which said lateral sewers connected with and emptied into the said discharging sewer mentioned in the preceding section.

"6. Attached hereto and made a part hereof is a plat of said city, showing, marked thereon in red-ink lines, the territory comprising said sewer district No. 3, and showing also in dotted lines of red ink the lines of sewer above mentioned, numbered from 1 to 5. Upon the north of the sewer district is Elm street, which is a street 45 feet wide. The other streets in the sewer district are 72 feet wide; the alleys are 18 feet wide, and the lots are 50 by 120 feet. None of the territory through which said discharging sewer passes is now or has ever been comprised within any other sewer district. The greater part of said sewer district No. 3 is upon a rocky bluff, about 50 feet above the valley of the Marmaton river. Said river runs through the city, and is the available place for discharge of sewers. At the point north of sewer district No. 3, the valley is much taken up with railroad buildings, tracks, switches, stock-yards, etc. It is a level, alluvial flat, and not used as sites for stores, or residences, or business property. The said discharging sewer runs throughout its whole distance either through Elm street, or through railroad ground and right-of-way, only about 391 feet being in Elm street. At no point does it run through any property owned by a private individual. Said discharging sewer is laid very shallow, averaging three feet underground. It is an 18-inch pipe, and it has no Ts or Ys or joints permitting connection from any source or direction except the laterals from said district. It is laid in the soft alluvial earth at little expense, and has a fall of one foot in two hundred feet, just enough to drain well; and at present it benefits no property outside of said sewer district No. 3, nor does any sewage pass into or through it from outside of said district; nor was it intended in the construction of said sewer that any property outside of said district should be benefited; nor was it built for any other purpose than to discharge the sewage of said district, except as said discharging sewer might be extended south to accommodate new sewer districts, which it is capable of doing; nor is it built or situated so that any property outside of said district can be benefited, or use said sewer, until extended as above stated. The laterals are laid deep, and are in part blasted out of hard rock, and have the following fall: No. 1, 44 feet; No. 2, 44 1/2 feet; No. 3, 47 1/3 feet; No. 4, 40 feet. The said discharging sewer runs to the best point of discharge at the Marmaton river, considering engineering difficulties and sanitary considerations, and was built pursuant to a well-considered plan, and with the possibility of being extended as above stated.

"7. Said sewers above...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • McMurry v. Kansas City and Thomas Kelley & Son
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1920
    ... ... the city, and outside the limits of the State. Sec. 8, Art ... 8, Charter; City of Fort Scott v. Kaufman, 44 Kan ... 137; Rector v. Board of Improvements, 50 Ark. 116; ... Deyo v. City of Newburg, 122 N.Y.S. 835. (2) The ... sewer ... ...
  • Board of Improvement of Sewer Improvement District No. 1 of Fayetteville v. Pollard
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 27, 1911
    ...179 Penn. St. 490; 36 A. 209; 48 N.E. 155; 53 N.J.L. 330; 21 A. 453; 37 N.J.L. 330; 60 Id. 168; 37 A. 737; 46 N.Y. 178; 84 N.Y. 108; 44 Kan. 137; 24 P. 64. Assessments beyond benefits are void. Brown on Fourteenth Amendment, 158, 165; 172 U.S. 269; 92 Texas 685; 154 Ind. 467; 64 Ga. 783; 35......
  • Besack v. City of Beatrice
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • April 6, 1951
    ...of the sewer constructed and situated entirely outside said district and in district No. 28. The Kansas court, in City of Fort Scott v. Kaufman, 44 Kan. 137, 24 P. 64, so construed and applied a statute identical in all material respects with section 16-672, R.S.1943. As stated in 1 Page an......
  • Paul v. Topeka Tp. Sewage Dist. No. 2, Shawnee County
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • July 12, 1967
    ...no present lateral sewer district. A sewer to his property would not lie in any lateral sewer district. In City of Fort Scott v. Kaufman, 44 Kan. 137, 140, 24 P. 64, 65, in an analogous situation the court 'In this case the mayor and council determined to construct sewers by districts, and ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT