City of Gadsden v. Elrod
Decision Date | 18 December 1947 |
Docket Number | 7 Div. 936. |
Citation | 250 Ala. 148,33 So.2d 270 |
Parties | CITY OF GADSDEN v. ELROD. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Jan. 22, 1948.
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
Miller & Pittman, of Gadsden, for petitioner.
Roy D. McCord, of Gadsden, opposed.
In denying the writ, we are passing only on the grounds on which certiorari is sought. No attack is here made as to the manner in which assignments of error should be made. Accordingly, we express no opinion on that part of the opinion of the Court of Appeals which deals with the methods of assignment of error. See Allison v. Sommers, 219 Ala. 33, 121 So. 42.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
EX PARTE STATE DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES
...Harris v. State, 272 Ala. 146, 130 So.2d 231 [(1961)]; Ex parte Thaggard, 276 Ala. 117, 159 So.2d 820 [(1964)]; City of Gadsden v. Elrod, 250 Ala. 148, 33 So.2d 270 [(1948)]."). The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is AFFIRMED. HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, and WOODALL, JJ.......
-
Ex Parte Yelverton
...grounds on which certiorari is sought." Ex parte Thaggard, 276 Ala. 117, 119, 159 So.2d 820, 822 (1963) (citing City of Gadsden v. Elrod, 250 Ala. 148, 33 So.2d 270 (1947); Davenport-Harris Funeral Home v. Chandler, 264 Ala. 623, 88 So.2d 878 (1956); Kelley v. Osborn, 269 Ala. 392, 113 So.2......
-
Opelika Montgomery Fair Co. v. Wright
...v. Elliott, 183 Ala. 298, at page 307, 62 So. 808; Allison-Russell-Withington Co. v. Sommers, 219 Ala. 33, 121 So. 42; City of Gadsden v. Elrod, 250 Ala. 148, 33 So.2d 270. The judgment overruling the demurrer in this case was general. Perforce it denied the validity of every ground assigne......
-
Ex parte Thaggard
.... . ..' In considering the petition for certiorari, we pass on only the grounds on which certiorari is sought. City of Gadsden v. Elrod, 250 Ala. 148, 33 So.2d 270; Davenport-Harris Funeral Home v. Chandler, 264 Ala. 623, 88 So.2d 878; Kelley v. Osborn, 269 Ala. 392, 113 So.2d 192; Harris v......