City of Gary v. Archer

Decision Date06 September 1973
Docket NumberNo. 3--1072A77,3--1072A77
Citation300 N.E.2d 687,157 Ind.App. 477
CourtIndiana Appellate Court
PartiesCITY OF GARY, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. Walter ARCHER, Appellee (Plaintiff Below).

J. Robert Miertschin, Jr., Asst. City Atty., Gary, for appellant.

Max Cohen, Gary, B. K. Delph, Hammond, for appellee.

STATON, Judge.

Archer received a jury verdict of Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars ($35,000.00). Twenty-One Thousand Dollars ($21,000.00) of the judgment was an award of punitive damages. His action against the City of Gary and one of its police officers was for assault and battery, false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. Punitive damages were requested. The City's answer was a general denial and self-defense. After closing argument, the jury was given instructions six (6), seven (7) and nine (9) which related to punitive damages. No objection was made by the City to any of these instructions. The first objection to punitive damages being requested by Archer in his complaint or instructions was on appeal in the City's motion to correct errors.

The issue attempted to be raised here for the first time on appeal is whether it is against public policy for the jury to award punitive damages against a municipality. Before reaching this issue, we must first determine whether the City waived the issue by failing to make any objection before or during trial.

Appeal of alleged errors during trial must be based upon an objection timely made during the trial. Dudley Sports Co. v. Schmitt (1972), Ind.App., 279 N.E.2d 266. This Court is without jurisdiction to consider questions raised for the first time on appeal. Aocker v. Buell (1970), 147 Ind.App. 422, 261 N.E.2d 894; Monon Railroad v. New York Central Railroad Company (1967), 141 Ind.App. 277, 227 N.E.2d 450.

Therefore, we must conclude that the City's proposed issue of error has been waived. The judgment of the trial court should be and the same hereby is affirmed.

HOFFMAN, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Turner v. Sheriff of Marion County
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Indiana
    • March 1, 2000
    ...v. City of Muncie, 655 N.E.2d 614, 622 (Ind.Ct.App.1995), trans. denied; Fleming, 397 N.E.2d at 1077; City of Gary v. Archer, 157 Ind.App. 477, 300 N.E.2d 687 (Ind.Ct.App.1973), trans. denied. Under the Tort Claims Act, only the Sheriff may be sued for the deputies' batteries. I.C. § 34-13-......
  • Bud Wolf Chevrolet, Inc. v. Robertson
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • June 1, 1987
    ...By its tender of a punitive damage instruction it has conceded that punitive damages is an issue. See City of Gary v. Archer (1973) 3d Dist., 157 Ind.App. 477, 300 N.E.2d 687. The defendant has not conceded, however, that the evidence submitted to the jury was so clear and convincing as to ......
  • Behme v. Behme
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • February 24, 1988
    ...204. This court has in the past referred to deficiencies in the motion to correct error as jurisdictional. See City of Gary v. Archer (1973), 157 Ind.App. 477, 300 N.E.2d 687, 688, trans. denied. On this basis, we conclude that an appellee is not precluded from arguing that an appellant's m......
  • Jones v. Sweeney, Cause No. 3:98CV0592CAN (N.D. Ind. 10/26/2000)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Indiana
    • October 26, 2000
    ...Crawford v. City of Muncie, 655 N.E.2d 614, 622 (Ind. App. 1995), trans. denied; Fleming, 397 N.E.2d at 1077; City of Gary v. Archer, 300 N.E.2d 687 (Ind. App. 1973), trans. Here, because the court has determined that the force used to effectuate the plaintiffs' arrests was reasonable under......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT