City of Genesee v. Latah County

Decision Date10 May 1894
Citation4 Idaho 141,36 P. 701
PartiesCITY OF GENESEE v. LATAH COUNTY
CourtIdaho Supreme Court

ROAD TAX-COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MUST LEVY-WHEN COLLECTED TO BE PAID INTO COUNTY TREASURY.-Boards of county commissioners must levy a road tax on all property in the county for road purposes, which, when collected, must be turned over to the county treasurer.

SAME-WHERE EXPENDED.-Twenty-five per cent of the property road tax must be expended for road purposes in the road district where collected.

ROAD DISTRICTS OF TOWNS AND VILLAGES.-Incorporated towns and villages as separate road districts are under the exclusive jurisdiction and control of the trustees thereof.

COUNTY TREASURERS-DUTY AS TO ROAD TAX.-County treasurers must hold twenty-five per cent of the property road tax levied and collected by the county within the corporate limits of towns and villages for their use, to be paid over on proper demand.

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CANNOT INTERFERE WITH HIGHWAYS OF TOWN.-Boards of county commissioners cannot authorize county road overseers to build, repair or in any way interfere with the highways of an incorporated town or village.

(Syllabus by the court.)

APPEAL from District Court, Latah County.

Reversed.

S. S Denning, for Plaintiff in Error.

Section 887 of the Revised Statutes of Idaho creates each city in the state a separate road district and confers upon the city council the same powers and enjoins the performance of the same duties imposed upon the board of county commissioners. A municipality may be incorporated under a general law and not by a special charter; yet, when incorporated thereunder, the general act constitutes, and has the same effect, as though specially granted by the legislature. (15 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 911.) A municipality may be estopped by action of its proper officers. (Chicago v. Sexton, 115 Ill. 230, 2 N.E. 263; Martell v. East St. Louis, 94 Ill. 67; Roby v. Chicago, 64 Ill. 447; Chicago R. R. Co v. Joliet, 79 Ill. 39; Logan Co. v. Lincoln, 81 Ill. 156.) Section 6, article 7 of the constitution of Idaho is an inhibition on the legislative branch of the state government from imposing taxes on any municipal corporation of the state, and to such municipal corporation is given the sole and absolute power to "assess and collect taxes for all purposes of such corporation." (San Francisco v London etc. Ins. Co., 74 Cal. 113, 5 Am. St. Rep. 425, 15 P. 380; People v. Parks, 58 Cal. 624, 644; Martin v. Aston, 60 Cal. 63; Ex parte Wolters, 65 Cal. 269, 3 P. 894; Cooley on Taxation, 2d ed., 692, and authorities cited in note 2.) Latah county in the years 1891 and 1892 collected a two mill property road tax from the inhabitants of the town of Genesee, and turned the same into the treasury of Latah county to the credit of the general road fund. An action to recover as for money had and received, is the proper remedy to recover the back tax. (Jefferson School Township v. School Town of Worthington, 5 Ind.App. 586, 32 N.E. 807; Cooley on Taxation, 815.)

George M. Parsons, Attorney General, for Latah County.

The city of Genesse is not the real party in interest and cannot maintain this proceeding. (Rev. Stats., sec. 4090.) A county cannot be made a party in an appeal from an order of a board of county commissioners. (Gorman v. County Commissioners, 1 Idaho 627.) The tax levied by the board of county commissioners is a general tax for general road purposes, and it is not levied for the benefit of districts, but for the benefit of the entire county. (Rev. Stats., sec. 882.) The "road tax" as provided for in sections 882 and 886 is not a tax for town or city purposes, but for county purposes--for the roads and highways of the entire county. The board of county commissioners have control of the public roads, and "to levy such tax therefor as authorized by law." (Rev. Stats., sec. 1759, subd. 4, sec. 870, subd. 7, as amended; 1st Sess. Laws, p. 191.) The city council or trustees have authority to levy a tax for general revenue purposes only. (Rev. Stats., sec. 2238, as amended; 1st Sess. Laws, p. 159.)

The county of Latah levied and collected a property road tax in the town of Genesee, in said county, in and for the years 1891 and 1892. The said town or city of Genesee was during said years a regularly organized municipal corporation under the laws of Idaho. None of said tax so collected was ever expended in said town of Genesee, nor paid over by the county to any person for the use and benefit of the streets of said town. The town of Genesee presented an account to the board of county commissioners of said county for twenty-five per cent of said tax so collected. The commissioners refused to issue a warrant therefor. Appeal was taken to the district court of said town, where action of board of commissioners was approved and affirmed. Thereupon, said cause was brought to this court for review. Reversed.

MORGAN, J. Huston, C. J., and Sullivan, J., concur.

OPINION

MORGAN, J. (After Stating the Facts.)

Section 886 of the Revised Statutes provides that county commissioners shall levy road tax on all property in the county for road purposes. This includes property of towns and villages. The tax so levied and collected was to be turned over to county...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State ex rel. McKelvey v. Styner
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 17 d5 Setembro d5 1937
    ... ... highway within city limits. (I. C. A., sec. 39-2108, as ... amended, Sess. Laws, 1935, 2d Ex ... from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, for ... Latah County. Hon. Gillies D. Hodge, Judge ... Proceeding ... in ... City of Wallace, 24 ... Idaho 706, 135 P. 850; City of Genesee v. Latah County, 4 ... Idaho 141, 36 P. 701.) ... In ... ...
  • Fenton v. Board of County Commissioners of Ada County
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 30 d1 Outubro d1 1911
    ... ... the legislature is prohibited from imposing taxes for the ... purpose of any county, city, town or other municipal ... corporation, but may by law vest in the corporate authorities ... tax levies that may be laid by these taxing bodies. ( City ... of Genesee v. Latah Co., 4 Idaho 141, 36 P. 701.) ... Neither ... the statutes nor the ... ...
  • Gallup v. Bliss
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 13 d4 Outubro d4 1927
    ... ... GALLUP, Respondent, v. ADELAIDE BLISS and THE CITY OF EMMETT, a Municipal Corporation, Appellants No. 4587Supreme Court of ... Gem County. Hon. Ed. L. Bryan, Judge ... Action ... for damages for ... 1303, 1306, 3942, 3962, 3963, 3976 and 3977; ... City of Genesee v. Latah County, 4 Idaho 141, 36 P ... 701; Town of Juliaetta v. Smith, ... ...
  • Village of Sand Point v. Doyle
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 30 d6 Dezembro d6 1905
    ... ... village or city, or that will result in damage to the ... property of the city or ... APPEAL ... from the District Court of Kootenai County. Honorable R. T ... Morgan, Judge ... Judgment ... for ... (Rev ... Stats., sec. 2230, subd. 16; City of Genessee v. Latah ... Co., 4 Idaho 141, 36 P. 701; Nelson v. Board of ... Commrs., 6 Colo ... of Carson v. City of Genesee, 9 Idaho 244, 108 Am ... St. Rep. 127, 74 P. 862. After reviewing the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT