City of Greenville v. Haywood
| Decision Date | 03 December 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. 407P98.,407P98. |
| Citation | City of Greenville v. Haywood, 525 S.E.2d 449, 349 N.C. 354 (N.C. 1998) |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | CITY OF GREENVILLE and National Casualty Company v. Connie Lorraine Smith HAYWOOD and Donald Wade Foster. |
Kenneth R. Wooten, New Bern, for Greenville.
James G. Billings, Raleigh, for Haywood.
Prior report: 130 N.C.App. 271, 502 S.E.2d 430.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of December 1998."
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
LAMBE REALTY INV. v. Allstate Ins. Co.
...115 N.C.App. 283, 290, 444 S.E.2d 487, 492,disc. review denied, 337 N.C. 694, 448 S.E.2d 528 (1994)), disc. review denied, 349 N.C. 354, 525 S.E.2d 449 (1998). In other words, a provision of the policy is ambiguous if "the writing leaves it uncertain as to what the agreement was." Internati......
-
Sargent v. Edwards
...without his/her consent[.]" City of Greenville v. Haywood, 130 N.C. App. 271, 275, 502 S.E.2d 430, 433, disc. review denied, 349 N.C. 354, 525 S.E.2d 449 (1998). "The elements of battery are intent, harmful or offensive contact, causation, and lack of privilege." Hawkins v. Hawkins, 101 N.C......
-
State v. Williams, No. COA08-318 (N.C. App. 10/21/2008), COA08-318
...without his/her consent[.]" City of Greenville v. Haywood, 130 N.C. App. 271, 275, 502 S.E.2d 430, 433, disc. review denied, 349 N.C. 354, 525 S.E.2d 449 (1998). The State need not prove the victim was put in fear where there is evidence of an actual battery. State v. Thompson, 27 N.C. App.......
2 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 5 ASSAULT
...in mitigation of damages.17--------Notes:[1] City of Greenville v. Haywood, 130 N.C. App. 271, 502 S.E.2d 430 (1998), review denied, 349 N.C. 354, 525 S.E.2d 449 (1998); Morrow v. King's Dep't Stores, 57 N.C. App. 13, 290 S.E.2d 732, disc. review denied, 306 N.C. 385, 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982).......
-
Chapter 7 BATTERY
...essential element of a battery.15--------Notes:[1] City of Greenville v. Haywood, 130 N.C. App. 271, 502 S.E.2d 430 (1998), review denied, 349 N.C. 354, 525 S.E.2d 449 (1998). Note that unauthorized medical procedures may also amount to assault or battery. See Nelson v. Patrick, 58 N.C. App......