City of Guthrie v. Beamer
Decision Date | 07 September 1895 |
Parties | THE CITY OF GUTHRIE v. H. C. BEAMER. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Error from the District Court of Logan County.
¶0 1. TOWNSITE LAWS--Act of Congress--Construction. By the terms of the act of congress approved May 14, 1890, for entry of townsites in Oklahoma by three trustees, to be appointed by the secretary of the interior, the secretary of the interior may, under rules and regulations promulgated by him, cause the lands occupied for townsite purposes to be surveyed and platted into lots, blocks, streets and alleys, or he may, through the trustees, adopt any survey and plat which had previously been made by the inhabitants of the townsites. And when a survey and plat had been made and adopted by the inhabitants prior to the passage of this act, and afterwards the secretary of the interior adopted and approved such survey and plat, the act of congress and the action of the secretary of the interior thereunder was in effect a dedication to the public uses of all such portions of the townsite as were designated on such plat as streets and alleys, and had the effect to divest any individual claim by settlement or occupancy to such portions.
2. PUBLIC DOMAIN--Congress Has Exclusive Power Over. Congress has exclusive power over the disposition of the public domain, and may, by appropriate legislation, divest any interest acquired by settlement or occupancy at any time prior to an entry of the land.
3. SAME--Vested Interest Not Acquired Until Entry Is Made. One claiming public lands as a homestead pre-emption or townsite settler acquires no vested interest as against the United States until an entry is made at the proper land office.
4. CITY OF GUTHRIE--Provisional Government--Survey--Dedication of Streets. The lands upon which the city of Guthrie is located were settled upon and occupied for townsite purposes on April 22, 1889, before any survey had been made for the townsite and without any reference to the necessity for streets, blocks and lots, every portion of the tract being occupied by claimants. Within a short time the inhabitants organized a provisional government for their own protection and guidance, and through such government adopted a survey and plat of the townsite on which was designated streets, alleys, blocks and lots, and the same were generally accepted and the settlers conformed themselves to said survey. Prior to the act of congress approved May 14, 1890, there was no law in Oklahoma under which townsites could be entered. After the adoption of this act the secretary of the interior caused said townsite to be entered by three trustees appointed by him, and adopted and approved the survey and plat formerly made by the inhabitants of the townsite and conveyance was made of the lots according to said plat. Beamer claimed, as an occupant, a parcel of ground situated in one of the designated streets. No entry of the townsite had been made prior to the approval of the act of May 14, 1890. Held, That the adoption and approval of such plat was a dedication by the United States of the lands designated on such plats as streets, and that the interest of Beamer as an occupant was divested by such action and he has no claim against the city or against the trustees for a conveyance.
5. VESTED RIGHT--When Not Acquired. No vested right as against the United States is acquired until all the prerequisites for the acquisition of the title have been complied with. (Ard v. Brandon, 157 U.S. 537.)
Keaton & Cotteral and B. T. Hainer, for plaintiff in error.
Harper S. Cunningham, for defendant in error.
¶1 This was an action brought in the district court of Logan county by the defendant in error, Henry C. Beamer, against the board of townsite trustees, appointed by the secretary of the interior and assigned to the city of Guthrie, under the act of congress approved May 14, 1890, and the city of Guthrie, defendants, to compel a conveyance to him by said trustees of a parcel of ground embraced within the townsite of Guthrie, and located on a portion of the tract laid out and used for a public street in said city. Issues were formed, trial had to the court upon an agreed statement of facts, and a finding had and decree entered in favor of Beamer, by which the parcel of land claimed by him was awarded to him in fee and a conveyance directed to be made to him of said parcel or lot. From this judgment the city of Guthrie comes to this court by petition in error, praying for a reversal of said judgment.
¶2 The agreed statement of facts contains all that is necessary for a proper understanding of the case. Said stipulation is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Omaechevviaria
... ... Dalton, 22 R. I ... 77, 84 Am. St. 818, 46 A. 234, 48 L. R. A. 775; Stearns ... v. City of Barre, 73 Vt. 281, 87 Am. St. 721, 50 A ... 1086, 58 L. R. A. 240; City of Laurens v ... 615, 624; Oregon Short Line R. Co. v. Quigley, 10 ... Idaho 770, 781, 80 P. 401; City of Guthrie v ... Beamer, 3 Okla. 652, 41 P. 647; United States v. Utah ... Power & Light Co., 209 F. 554, ... ...
-
Okla. City v. Wainwright
...were such occupants of the lots in question, and the owners of an interest which they could "sell, convey or encumber." City of Guthrie v. Beamer, 3 Okla. 652, 41 P. 647 (and cases therein cited). The legal title was in the trustees "in trust for the occupying claimants, it is true, but als......
-
City of Okla. City v. McMaster
...judgment is hereby affirmed; not intending that this opinion shall be at variance with the doctrine laid down in the case of City of Guthrie v. Beamer, 3 Okla. 652, the facts in the two cases being different. ¶35 Burford, C. J., and Burwell, J., not sitting; Pancoast, J., dissenting; all th......
-
City of Oklahoma City v. Frank Master
...the town sites to be made by the trustees 'for the several use and benefit of the occupants thereof.' The supreme court in Guthrie v. Beamer, 3 Okla. 652, 41 Pac. 647, has held substantially the same views which we now state in the case at bar. We are unable to see any real difference in th......