City of Harrisonville v. McCall Serv. Stations
| Docket Number | SC94115 |
| Decision Date | 23 August 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
17 cases
-
Brock v. Dunne
...of review for a circuit court's overruling of a motion for directed verdict and JNOV are essentially the same. City of Harrisonville v. McCall Serv. Stations , 495 S.W.3d 738, 748 (Mo. banc 2016). "This Court must determine whether the plaintiff presented a submissible case by offering evid......
-
Williams v. City of Kan. City
...objection to the instructions it is now claiming to be error, the issue is not preserved for appellate review. City of Harrisonville v. McCall Serv. Stations , 495 S.W.3d 738, 747 (Mo. banc 2016) (citing Howard v. City of Kansas City , 332 S.W.3d 772, 790 (Mo. banc 2011) ). Even if the issu......
-
Veal v. Kelam
...conference, stating distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection." See Rule 70.03; City of Harrisonville v. McCall Serv. Stations , 495 S.W.3d 738, 746 (Mo. banc 2016). We cannot find the trial court committed error entitling Appellant to a new trial or remittitur.Poin......
-
Estes v. Bd. of Trs. of the Mo. Pub. Entity Risk Mgmt. Fund
...MOPERM cannot be sued for those claims. MOPERM argues that we are bound by the Supreme Court's decision in City of Harrisonville v. McCall Service Stations , 495 S.W.3d 738, 751 (Mo. banc 2016), which limited claims that could be asserted against the PSTIF to only those "claims" expressly a......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Missouri Supreme Court resets the rules for collecting leaking underground storage tank cleanup costs in litigation
...how and how much UST owners and operators may collect from the Fund. Paul Sonderegger Crystal Kennedy City of Harrisonville v. McCall Service Stations, 495 S.W.3d 738, 743 (Mo. banc In Harrisonville, the city filed suit against the Fund, alleging negligent and fraudulent representation due ......