City of Kansas v. Payne
Decision Date | 31 October 1879 |
Citation | 71 Mo. 159 |
Parties | CITY OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. PAYNE. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.--HON. S. H. WOODSON, Judge.
REVERSED.
T. A. Gill and Field & Small for appellant.
F. M. Black for respondent.
This was a suit by the city of Kansas for the collection of city taxes from 1866 to 1878 inclusive. The plaintiff claimed that interest should be added to the tax assessed, at the rate of twenty-four per cent per annum, as provided by the charter, and the defendant, that interest should be allowed pursuant to the act of the General Assembly relative to delinquent taxes, approved April 24th, 1879.
Unless otherwise expressly provided by its charter, no city or town had a lien for taxes on real property until the passage of that act. By the acts of 1872 and 1877, it was provided that real property should in all cases be liable for all taxes due any city, or incorporated town, or school district, and a lien was thereby created in favor of the State of Missouri for all such taxes, enforceable as in those acts provided. Sess. Acts 1872, p. 119; Sess. Acts 1877, p. 384. The city or town had no remedy to enforce the collection of taxes delinquent on real estate, unless expressly given by the charter. The lien for the taxes was reserved to the State, which had complete control over it, and had exercised that control by making delinquent taxes due to towns and cities collectable by the State collectors, and, when suit was necessary by suit in the name of the State.
By the charter of the city of Kansas, approved March 24th, 1875, Section 25, article 6, Sess. Acts 1875, p. 225. By section 76, article 6, (Ib. 241,) she had ample means for the collection of delinquent taxes on real property by the sale of the property, or by suit in her own name. Thus the law stood when the act of 1879 was passed. It is entitled “An act to amend sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 11, 14, 17 and 18 of an act approved April 12th, 1877, entitled ‘An act to provide for the collection of delinquent taxes due the State, and repealing section 184 of an act concerning the assessment and collection of the revenue,” approved March 30th, 1872. The act of 1872 applied to Kansas City, for at that time she had no lien on real estate for taxes assessed against it; and for her delinquent taxes a lien was created and reserved to the State, and they were collected by the county collector; but, by the charter, as amended in 1875, a lien was expressly given to the city, and by section 24, article 6, it was provided that the collector of Jackson county should not thereafter collect any taxes or special assessments theretofore or thereafter levied by said city, but that they should be collected by the city through its own officers. After the passage of that act, sections 178, 179, 180, 181, 182 and 184 of the act of 1872 ceased to be applicable to the City of Kansas, and neither, consequently, were corresponding sections of the act of 1877 applicable to the city taxes of Kansas City.
The provisions of the act of 1879 apply equally to State and city or town taxes. The inclusion of those towns and cities which had no lien on real estate for taxes, nor any remedy to enforce the payment of delinquent taxes, was germain to the title of the act, because for such taxes the State had a lien and collected them by her officers and by suits in her name. But there is nothing whatever in the title of the act of 1879 to apprise any one of a purpose to legislate in regard to the taxes of cities or towns having a lien for their taxes and a remedy to enforce it. Such taxes are not State taxes in any sense, while delinquent taxes due other cities and towns for which a lien was created and reserved to the State, and which were, after they became delinquent, collectible only by the State, were State taxes. Such cities and towns had no remedy to enforce the lien, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McGrew v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co.
...ex rel. v. Lafayette County, 41 Mo. 39; State v. Great Western Coffee Co., 171 Mo. 634, 71 S. W. 1011, 94 Am. St. Rep. 802; City of Kansas v. Payne, 71 Mo. 159 ; State ex rel. v. Baker, 129 Mo. 482, 31 S. W. 924; Witzmann v. Railway Co., 131 Mo. 612, 33 S. W. 181; Shively v. Lankford, 174 M......
-
State v. Hedrick
...Auxiliary v. Revelle, 257 Mo. 529, 165 S. W. 1084; St. Louis v. Weitzel, 130 Mo. 600, loc. cit. 616, 31 S. W. 1045; City of Kansas v. Payne, 71 Mo. 159, loc. cit. 162; State v. Great Western Coffee & Tea Co., 171 Mo. 634, loc. cit. 643, 71 S. W. 1011, 94 Am. St. Rep. 802; State v. Burgdoerf......
-
State ex Inf. Attorney-General v. Curtis
...26; State v. McEniry, 269 Mo. 228; State ex inf. v. Borden, 164 Mo. 221; State ex rel. Greene County v. Gideon, 277 Mo. 356; City of Kansas v. Payne, 71 Mo. 159; Vice v. Kirksville, 280 Mo. 348; Berry v. Majestic Co., 284 Mo. 182; State ex rel. v. Revelle, 257 Mo. 529. (5) The act denies to......
-
Hammett v. Kansas City
...237 Mo. 383, 135 S.W. 929; State v. Fulks, 207 Mo. 26, 105 S.W. 733; State ex rel. Steele v. Baker, 129 Mo. 482, 39 S.W. 924; Kansas City v. Payne, 71 Mo. 159; State ex rel. Hixon v. Schofield, 41 Mo. 39. (4) Ordinance No. 6977 is not prohibited by Section 8395, R.S. 1939, relating to "Regu......