City of Liberal v. Vargas, 85,583.
Decision Date | 13 April 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 85,583.,85,583. |
Citation | 24 P.3d 155,28 Kan. App.2d 867 |
Parties | CITY OF LIBERAL, KANSAS, Appellant, v. JUAN VARGAS, Appellee. |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Kevin D. Weakley, of Sharp, McQueen, McKinley, Dreiling & Tate, P.A., of Liberal, for appellant.
Peter G. Olson, of Brooks, Allen & Olson, of Liberal, for appellee.
Before PIERRON, P.J., MARQUARDT, J., and BUCHELE, S.J.
The City of Liberal (City) appeals the district court's ruling that Juan Vargas did not commit the crime of identity theft. We affirm.
In February 2000, Officer Rogers was on duty and noticed a car being driven without a tag light. Officer Rogers stopped the vehicle and asked the driver for his driver's license and proof of insurance. The driver produced Missouri and National Beef Packing Company (National Beef) identification cards bearing the name of Guillermo Hernandez. Officer Rogers ran the name through a regional system. The system produced five identical matches in other states.
The driver admitted that his name was Juan Vargas. He later confessed that he was not authorized to work in the United States and that he had bought papers identifying himself as Guillermo Hernandez so that he could obtain employment at National Beef. Vargas pled guilty in municipal court to one count of identity theft, one count of no seat belt, one count of no tag light, and one count of no driver's license. Vargas appealed the municipal court's decision to the district court.
The district court convicted Vargas of one count of no tag light, one count of no seat belt, and one count of no driver's license. Vargas was acquitted on the count of identity theft. The district court held that the City failed to meet its burden to show fraud in the use of the false identity card. The City appeals.
We note at the outset a jurisdictional peculiarity. Vargas pled guilty in the municipal court, yet he appealed the merits of his case to the district court. However, the prohibition against appeals provided for in K.S.A. 22-3602(a) does not apply to pleas accepted by a judge of a Kansas municipal court. See City of Dodge City v. Frey, 26 Kan. App.2d 559, 560, 990 P.2d 1240 (1999). Therefore, this court does have jurisdiction to consider this issue.
The City asks this court to determine whether Vargas' use of a false identification to secure employment and receive the economic benefit of a salary is tantamount to defrauding another person.
Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, and this court's review is unlimited. See State v. Patterson, 25 Kan. App.2d 245, 247, 963 P.2d 436, rev. denied 265 Kan. 888 (1998).
It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that the intent of the legislature governs if that intent can be ascertained. The legislature is presumed to have expressed its intent through the language of the statutory scheme it enacted. In re Marriage of Killman, 264 Kan. 33, 42, 955 P.2d 1228 (1998).
Without state or federal cases to guide our inquiry, we turn to the legislative history of K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4018.
The crime of identity theft was created by the 1998 Kansas Legislature. See L. 1998, ch. 179, § 1. Representative Bonnie Sharp, a proponent of the legislation, believed it was necessary to criminalize identity theft. She cited the example of a person's social security number being used by another to obtain an illegal checking account and/or a credit card. Representative Sharp stated that the citizens of Kansas should be protected from "this potentially devastating crime." Minutes of the House Committee on Federal and State Affairs, February 12, 1998, p. 1.
Kyle Smith, an assistant attorney general for the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, testified on behalf of the bill. Smith was concerned that the "surreptitious acquisition of information done with the intent to defraud" was not illegal at the time the bill was proposed. Smith cited the examples of a motel clerk selling a credit card number or a "trasher" obtaining a social security number, which would allow an individual to access other information, leading to theft. Minutes of the House Committee on Federal and State Affairs, February 12, 1998, p. 1.
The committee also heard testimony from Dave Schroeder, a special agent from the Kansas Bureau of Investigation. Agent Schroeder defined identity theft as "[a]cquiring someone's personal identifying information in an effort to impersonate them or commit various criminal acts in that person's name." Agent Schroeder went on to state that individuals who are armed with a stolen identity can commit numerous forms of fraud. Agent Schroeder was specifically concerned about the theft of personal...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Prieto-Lozoya
...insufficient to support his identity theft conviction.{38} Relying on a case from the Kansas Court of Appeals, City of Liberal v. Vargas , 28 Kan.App.2d 867, 24 P.3d 155 (2001), Defendant asserts that using a stolen identity to obtain employment is legally insufficient to support an identit......
-
State v. Valdiviezo-Martinez
...an economic harm and the worker received unearned compensation. For support, Valdiviezo-Martinez cites City of Liberal v. Vargas , 28 Kan. App. 2d 867, 24 P.3d 155 (2001).There, the State charged the defendant with identity theft by presenting an employer false documents including what appe......
-
State v. Covey
...v. Jackson, 32 Conn.App. 724, 630 A.2d 164 (1993) ; Brown v. State, 225 Ga.App. 750, 484 S.E.2d 795 (1997) ; City of Liberal v. Vargas, 28 Kan.App.2d 867, 24 P.3d 155 (2001) ; People v. Gaissert, 75 Misc.2d 478, 348 N.Y.S.2d 82 (1973) ; State v. Berry, 129 Wash.App. 59, 117 P.3d 1162 (2005)......
-
State v. Hardesty
...284 Kan. 741, 742, 163 P.3d 1232 (2007). In support of his interpretation of K.S.A. 21-4018, Hardesty cites City of Liberal v. Vargas, 28 Kan.App.2d 867, 868, 24 P.3d 155, rev. denied 271 Kan. 1035 (2001). There, the defendant used the identification of a fictitious person to obtain employm......
-
Protecting Personal Information from Identity Theft: an Integrated Approach
...1998 Sess. (Kan. 1998). [48] H.B. 2805, 2000 Sess. (Kan. 2000). [49] K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 21-4018(b). [50] City of Liberal v. Vargas, 28 Kan. App. 2d 867, 870 (2001). [51] Id. at 867. [52] Id. at 869-70. [53] Id. at 870. [54] Id. [55] See State v. Meza, 38 Kan. App. 2d 245, 248 (2007); State v......
-
Appellate Decisions
...number to his employer when hired in 2005 is compared to statute in effect in 2012. Disagreement stated with City of Liberal v. Vargas, 28 Kan.App.2d 867 (2001). Here, sufficient evidence that Valdiviezo-Martinez intentionally deceived his employer and induced employer to rely on that decep......