City of Marshalltown v. Forney

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Iowa
Writing for the CourtDAY, CH. J.
Citation16 N.W. 740,61 Iowa 578
PartiesTHE CITY OF MARSHALLTOWN v. FORNEY
Decision Date03 October 1883

16 N.W. 740

61 Iowa 578

THE CITY OF MARSHALLTOWN
v.

FORNEY

Supreme Court of Iowa, Davenport

October 3, 1883


[16 N.W. 741]

Appeal from Tama Circuit Court.

BLOCK No. 10, in the city of Marshalltown, is composed of twelve lots, of which six front upon a street upon the north, and six front upon Main street upon the south. Through this block an alley runs east and west. Another alley, sixteen and a half feet wide, also extends north and south through the block, between lots 3 and 4 and 9 and 10. The defendant owned two twenty-feet building lots on the west, and one on the east, of this last named alley, said lots having a depth of one hundred and eighty feet. Forney caused to be represented to the city council that he would build a large and commodious opera house, in connection with stores, upon these lots, at a cost of from eighteen to twenty thousand dollars, if the city would vacate the alley and allow him to use it for an entrance way to the opera hall. He also caused to be presented to the council the plan of the ground floor of a building, prepared by one Ellis, an architect, covering his three twenty-feet lots and the alley, and extending back the whole depth of the lots, being seventy-six and a half feet front and one hundred and eighty feet deep, with two store rooms in front, west of the alley, and one east of the alley, and a circular opera room in the rear, with large stage, the entrance to the room being over the alley. This building Ellis represented could be erected for from $ 18,000 to $ 20,000. (The property owners in block 10 signed a paper, stating that they were in favor of the vacation of the south half of the alley in said block, for the purpose of erecting an opera house thereon, and entrance thereto, and maintenance thereof. Thereupon, on the twenty-third day of December, 1878, the city council adopted an ordinance as follows:

"An ordinance vacating the alley in the south half of block No. 10, of the original town of Marshall, on conditions:

"SEC. 1. Be it ordained by the city council of the city of Marshalltown, that the alley described as follows, to wit, the alley running north from Main street in the middle of block No. ten (10), of the original town of Marshall, to the alley running east and west through said block, be and the same is hereby vacated, only upon the express conditions hereinafter following and expressed. That Henry Forney, his heirs or assigns, build and erect, within one year and six months from the passage of this ordinance, and maintain forever, an elegant and commodious opera house, of the value of at least $ 20,000, upon the adjacent lots and on said alley, and shall use said alley for said opera house and for an entrance way thereto, and for no other use or purpose, and shall pay all taxes and charges that may be hereafter assessed against said alley so vacated, municipal or otherwise.

"SEC. 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force only after its publication, and written acceptance of Henry Forney of the conditions thereof, filed in the city clerk's office within thirty days of its publication, and upon his failure so to file such acceptance as aforesaid within the said thirty days, then the above vacation and grant shall not become operative to vest any rights or privileges whatever."

The defendant accepted all the conditions of this ordinance on the ninth day of January, 1879. Subsequently the defendant was informed by Mr. Foster, a competent architect, that it would cost $ 40,000 to erect a building covering the entire depth of the lots, with an opera house in the rear. Finally he adopted a plan fifty-six and one-half feet front and ninety feet in depth, with two store rooms below and music hall above, the entrance being over the alley. The plans and specifications were left at the mayor's office in Marshalltown for inspection, and he received bids for construction, and they were there ten days before the contract was let. The defendant entered upon the alley and excavated it, in connection with his two lots, for a basement, and has erected thereon a handsome building, at a cost of about $ 16,000. In the second story he has constructed a large square room,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 practice notes
  • Hubbell v. City of Des Moines, 30131
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • October 2, 1915
    ...to vacate the streets and alleys, but to devote them thereafter to other than public purposes. See also, City of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa 578, 16 N.W. 740; Harrington v. Iowa Cent. R. Co., 126 Iowa 388, 102 N.W. 139; City of Lake City v. Fulkerson, 122 Iowa 569, 98 N.W. 376; Walker v......
  • Canady v. Coeur d'Alene Lumber Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1911
    ...510, 111 N.W. 140, 15 Ann. Cas. 685; Knapp, Stout & Co. v. St. Louis, 156 Mo. 343, 56 S.W. 1102, and cases cited; Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa 578, 16 N.W. 740; Whitsett v. Union Depot & R. Co., 10 Colo. 243, 15 P. 339.) The appellant cannot complain of the vacation made by the several o......
  • Knoxville Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. City of Knoxville
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Tennessee
    • June 7, 1926
    ...Matter of the Mayor, 28 App. Div. 143, 52 N. Y. S. 588. "A like holding was made in the case of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa, 578 [16 N. W. 740]: "`Now, if the vacation of a street puts an end to the public use, it certainly cannot affect the power of the city to vacate, that the vacatio......
  • Louden v. Starr, 29553
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • October 2, 1915
    ...recognized that the city may vacate public streets or alleys and devote the same to private use. See City of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa 578, 16 N.W. 740; Harrington v. Railway Company, 126 Iowa 388, 102 N.W. 139; Lake City v. Fulkerson, 122 Iowa 569, 98 N.W. 376, and Walker v. City of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
29 cases
  • Hubbell v. City of Des Moines, 30131
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • October 2, 1915
    ...to vacate the streets and alleys, but to devote them thereafter to other than public purposes. See also, City of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa 578, 16 N.W. 740; Harrington v. Iowa Cent. R. Co., 126 Iowa 388, 102 N.W. 139; City of Lake City v. Fulkerson, 122 Iowa 569, 98 N.W. 376; Walker v......
  • Canady v. Coeur d'Alene Lumber Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1911
    ...510, 111 N.W. 140, 15 Ann. Cas. 685; Knapp, Stout & Co. v. St. Louis, 156 Mo. 343, 56 S.W. 1102, and cases cited; Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa 578, 16 N.W. 740; Whitsett v. Union Depot & R. Co., 10 Colo. 243, 15 P. 339.) The appellant cannot complain of the vacation made by the several o......
  • Knoxville Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. City of Knoxville
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Tennessee
    • June 7, 1926
    ...Matter of the Mayor, 28 App. Div. 143, 52 N. Y. S. 588. "A like holding was made in the case of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa, 578 [16 N. W. 740]: "`Now, if the vacation of a street puts an end to the public use, it certainly cannot affect the power of the city to vacate, that the vacatio......
  • Louden v. Starr, 29553
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • October 2, 1915
    ...recognized that the city may vacate public streets or alleys and devote the same to private use. See City of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa 578, 16 N.W. 740; Harrington v. Railway Company, 126 Iowa 388, 102 N.W. 139; Lake City v. Fulkerson, 122 Iowa 569, 98 N.W. 376, and Walker v. City of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT