City of New York v. Hall, 227.
Decision Date | 19 January 1944 |
Docket Number | No. 227.,227. |
Citation | 139 F.2d 935 |
Parties | CITY OF NEW YORK v. HALL. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Murray M. Weinstein, and Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Corp. Counsel, both of New York City (Arthur H. Goldberg, Sol Charles Levine, and Bernard H. Sherris, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
David M. Schwartz, and Jules Shank, both of New York City (Samuel Newfield
and David M. Schwartz, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before SWAN, CLARK, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
Enough has been done here to bring the City's claims within Section 67, sub. b, 11 U.S.C.A. § 107, sub. b. The sole issue is whether they came within Section 67, sub. c, so that they are subordinated to the administration expenses covered by clauses (1) and (2) of Section 64, sub. a, 11 U.S. C.A. § 104, sub. a. And that depends on whether the lien was "accompanied by possession" of the property, which, in turn, depends on the answer to the question whether "possession", as used in Section 67, sub. c, means merely "constructive" possession, for obviously there was not actual possession by the City at the time of the filing of the bankruptcy petition.
Davis v. City of New York, 2 Cir., 119 F.2d 559, does not answer that question, for there the warrant officer had completed the levy and, therefore, had actually seized the property under the warrant before the filing of the petition. The City in its brief concedes that here "the levy and inventory of the bankrupt's property * * * did not occur until an hour or two after the bankruptcy."
The word "possession" drips with ambiguity.2 It is not a single purpose word3 and must be contextually construed. That for some purposes, under some sections of the act, it may include "constructive" possession gives us no answer to our question. We are convinced that Section 67, sub. c, meant something more. The aim of that amendment is well discussed in 4 Moore's Collier on Bankruptcy (14th Ed.) 163-164: "As a result of long inaction of tax authorities, liens for taxes which accumulated over a number of years often consumed a bankrupt's entire estate, even to the exclusion of costs and expenses of the bankruptcy proceedings".4 The facts here are illustrative: the City's claims are for taxes which had accumulated for seven or eight years respectively. Notwithstanding the admonition of Section 67, sub. c, the City chose to slumber on its rights. Congress intended to penalize such somnolence.
In Section 67, sub. c, Congress obviously had uniformity in mind. Consequently, New York decisions concerning the effect on other creditors of such action as that, here taken by the City,5 are not controlling. Whether a lien exists within Section 67, sub. b, is a question of State "law". Whether steps taken pursuant to State "law" are sufficient to constitute "possession" under 67, sub. c, is a question of Federal "law".6 That conduct must adequately warn potential petitioning creditors of the existence of the lien. The City's action did not satisfy that test.
Affirmed.
Appendix
Section 67, subdivisions b and c, of the Bankruptcy Act as amended in 1938, 11 U.S.C.A. § 107, reads as follows:
Clauses (1) and (2) of Section 64, sub. a follows:
"* * * (1) the actual and necessary costs and expenses of preserving the estate subsequent to filing the petition; * * * the costs and expenses of administration * * *; (2) wages * * *."
The provisions pertaining to the City's tax lien, the docketing of warrants and the execution and enforcement thereof are contained in the local laws imposing the sales and business taxes. The relevant portion of the sales tax law is subdivision b of Section N41 — 11.0 of the Administrative Code of the City, entitled: "Proceedings to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gardner v. State of New Jersey
... ... Mr.James D. Carpenter, Jr., of Jersey City, N.J., for petitioner ... Mr. Benjamin C. Van ... court in this respect was passed upon in People of State of New York v. Irving Trust Co., 288 U.S. 329, 53 S.Ct. 89, 77 L.Ed. 815. In that ... Hall, 2 Cir., 139 F.2d 935, or the equity rule, 9 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ... ...
-
Lyford v. State of New York
... ... February 9, 1944. 140 F.2d 841 Jesse E. Waid, of New York City, for appellants ... Elbert N. Oakes, of New York City, for Frederic E. Lyford ... Hall, 2 Cir., 139 F.2d 935 ... This conclusion establishes the lien of the State for ... 784; People ex rel. Iroquois Door Co. v. Knapp, 186 App.Div. 172, 173 N.Y.S. 641, affirmed 227 N.Y. 592, 125 N. E. 923. Here the arrangement in the first instance was clearly a gratuity which ... ...
-
U.S. v. Cambio Exacto, S.A.
... ... Carter, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York (Varuni Nelson, Arthur P. Hui, Jennifer C. Boal, Elliot M. Schachner, ... 'possession' drips with ambiguity," Mercado, 873 F.2d at 644 (quoting City of New York v. Hall, 139 F.2d 935, 936 (2d Cir.1944)), we have similarly ... ...
-
In re Thriftway Auto Rental Corp.
...The decisions of this court dealing with the Administrative Code similarly lend support to the City's position. See City of New York v. Hall, 139 F.2d 935 (2d Cir. 1944); In re Saratoga Paint Co., 31 F.Supp. 514 (E.D.N.Y.1940), aff'd sub nom. Davis v. City of New York, 119 F.2d 559 (2d Cir.......