City of New York v. United States Grossman v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc, No. 1121

Decision Date16 March 1970
Docket NumberNo. 1121,No. 1122
Citation25 L.Ed.2d 280,397 U.S. 248,90 S.Ct. 1105
PartiesCITY OF NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES et al. Marshall B. GROSSMAN et al. v. AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

J. Lee Rankin, Norman Redlich, John R. Thompson, and David I. Shapiro, for appellant City of New York.

Benjamin F. Schwartz and Herbert A. Karzen, for appellants Marshall B. Grossman and others.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, and Bernard M. Hollander, for the United States.

Carl J. Schuck, Wayne H. Knight, Fred D. Fagg III, Philip K. Verleger, Allyn O. Kreps, Julian O. Von Kalinowski, Lloyd N. Cutler, Howard P. Willens, James S. Campbell, Ross L. Malone, and Marcus Mattson, for appellees Automobile Manufacturers Ass'n, Inc., and others.

Jerry S. Cohen, Harold E. Kohn, Aaron M. Fine, and William T. Coleman, Jr., for City of Baltimore and others, amici curiae.

John H. Larson, for County of Los Angeles and others, amicus curiae.

David Berger and Herbert B. Newberg, for County of Lackawanna and others, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

In No. 1121 the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

In No. 1122 the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

To continue reading

Request your trial
34 cases
  • United States v. American Tel. and Tel. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • 28 Febrero 1983
    ...79, 30 L.Ed.2d 37 (1971); United States v. Automobile Manufacturers Ass'n, 307 F.Supp. 617, 619 (C.D.Cal.1969), aff'd, 397 U.S. 248, 90 S.Ct. 1105, 25 L.Ed.2d 280 (1970); United States v. Blue Chip Stamp Co., 272 F.Supp. 432 (C.D.Cal.1967), aff'd, 389 U.S. 580, 88 S.Ct. 693, 19 L.Ed.2d 781 ......
  • Bracco v. Lackner
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • 5 Abril 1978
    ... ... QUALITY CARE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL CENTERS, INC., a California Corporation, dba the San n Center, Joseph A. Califano, Secretary, United States Department of Health, Education and ... , for the Office of the District Attorney, City and County of San Francisco ... 462 F. Supp ... 1011, 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970), New York City welfare officials were enjoined from ... § 405.1121(k)(4); 45 C.F.R. § 249.12(a)(1)(ii)(B)(4). They ... ...
  • Zenith Radio Corp v. Hazeltine Research, Inc
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 24 Febrero 1971
    ... ... grant patent licenses to American manufacturers seeking to export American-made radio and ... one, against certain members of which the United States Government had brought an antitrust action ... See, e.g., Swartz v. New York Central R. Co., 323 F.2d 713, 714 (CA7 1963); ... ...
  • United States v. City of Parma, Ohio
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Ohio
    • 5 Junio 1980
    ... ... 12 Lofts Realty, Inc., 610 F.2d 1032 (2d Cir. 1979); Bishop v ... Board of Education of New York v. Harris, 444 U.S. 130, 100 S.Ct. 363, 62 ... , the Code of Ethics of the National Association of Real Estate Brokers stated: "A Realtor should ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library The Federal Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property. Origins and Applications
    • 1 Enero 2010
    ...58 Table of Cases 231 Grid Sys. Corp. v. Texas Instruments, 771 F. Supp. 1033 (N.D. Cal. 1991), 77 Grossman v. Automobile Mfrs. Ass’n, 397 U.S. 248 (1970), 45 Gruendler Crusher & Pulverizer Co. v. Williams Patent Crusher & Pulverizer Co., 496 F. Supp. 1385 (E.D. Mo. 1980), 77 H Hand v. Cent......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Intellectual Property and Antitrust Handbook. Second Edition
    • 6 Diciembre 2015
    ...United States v. Automobile Mfrs. Ass’n, 307 F. Supp. 617 (C.D. Cal. 1969), appeal dismissed sub nom. City of New York v. United States , 397 U.S. 248 (1970), modified sub nom. United States v. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n , 1982-83 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 65,088 (C.D. Cal. 1982), 158, 433, 455 Uni......
  • Antitrust Analysis Of Intellectual Property Agreements
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Intellectual Property and Antitrust Handbook. Second Edition
    • 6 Diciembre 2015
    ...note 1, § 5.5. 619. See United States v. Auto. Mfrs. Ass’n, 307 F. Supp. 617 (C.D. Cal. 1969), aff’d , City of New York v. United States, 397 U.S. 248 (1970) (approving consent decree); In re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution, 367 F. Supp. 1298 (C.D. Cal. 1973). 620. See generally Analysi......
  • The Guidelines' Approach to Antitrust Analysis and Market Definition
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library The Federal Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property. Origins and Applications
    • 1 Enero 2010
    ...laws. See United States v. Automobile Mfrs. Ass’n, 307 F. Supp. 617 (C.D. Cal. 1969), aff’d sub nom. Grossman v. Automobile Mfrs. Ass’n, 397 U.S. 248 (1970). Special Issues Associated With Standard-Setting Organizations 45 actions, particularly merger cases, both before and after the issuan......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT