City of New York v. Federal Radio Commission

Decision Date04 November 1929
Docket NumberNo. 4898.,4898.
Citation36 F.2d 115
PartiesCITY OF NEW YORK v. FEDERAL RADIO COMMISSION.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Herbert L. Davis, of Washington, D. C., and J. A. Devery, of New York City, for appellant.

Bethuel M. Webster, Jr., Paul M. Segal, and Elmer W. Pratt, all of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Federal Radio Commission denying appellant's application for a modification of its existing station license. The controversy relates to an order of the Commission whereby appellant's radio broadcasting station was denied the right to operate for full time, and was required to "share time" equally with station WMCA.

It appears that in the year 1924 a license was granted by the Secretary of Commerce, under the Radio Act of 1912 (37 Stat. 302 47 USCA §§ 51-60), granting permission to the city of New York to operate a radio broadcasting station in that city. The license was for three months, the call letters were WNYC, the frequency was 570 kilocycles, and the station was to be allowed full and unlimited time of operation.

This license was renewed from time to time by the Secretary of Commerce and the Federal Radio Commission respectively, upon the same terms, until in the year 1928. The Commission then made a revised allocation of all the broadcasting stations in the country, as to their frequencies, power, and time of operation. As part of this revision station WNYC was given the same frequency as before, but was denied full-time operation, and was required to share time equally with station WMCA. The latter station had its studio in New York and its transmitter in New Jersey, and operated at the same frequency as station WNYC. Pursuant to this assignment the Commission issued a renewal license to appellant, subject to the condition that it share time with WMCA.

Appellant thereupon applied for a modification of this license, and requested that station WNYC be given unlimited time of operation, as before. The application was duly heard by the Commission after notice to appellant and to station WMCA, both of whom appeared and submitted evidence and arguments. The Commission thereupon decided that public interest, convenience, and necessity required that operating time should be equally divided between the two stations as provided by the license, and accordingly overruled the application. This appeal was then taken under section 16 of the Radio Act of 1927, 44 Stat. 1169 (47 USCA § 96).

It is contended by appellant that it has acquired a property right to operate its station at full time, and that the restriction imposed by the Commission's present order amounts to a taking of appellant's property without due process of law, in violation of the Constitution of the United States.

We do not agree with this contention. In our opinion the interstate broadcasting of radio communications is a species of interstate commerce, and as such is subject to federal regulation. Whitehurst v. Grimes (D. C.) 21 F.(2d) 787; United States v. American Bond & Mortgage Co. (D. C.) 31 F.(2d) 448; General Electric Co. v. Federal Radio Commission, 58 App. D. C. 386, 31 F.(2d) 630; Davis, Law of Radio, 71; Zollman, Law of the Air, 102, 103. In the exercise of this authority Congress has imposed upon the Federal Radio Commission the duty of classifying radio stations, of assigning bands of frequency to the various classes of stations and for each individual station, and of determining the power which each station shall use and the time during which it may operate. Section 4 (a) and (c), Radio Act of 1927 (47 USCA § 84(a) and (c). This regulation must deal with...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Beard v. Vinsonhaler
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 23, 1949
    ... ... levied by Ordinance No. 7573 of the City of Little Rock. The ... appellees, a partnership owning ... purpose of broadcasting by radio transmission or (b) ... engage in the business of ... controlled and regulated by the Federal Communications ... Commission ... ...
  • Beard v. Vinsonhaler
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 23, 1949
    ...448, 454; Technical Radio Laboratory v. Federal Radio Comm., 59 App.D.C. 125, 36 F.2d 111, 66 A.L.R. 1355; City of New York v. Federal Radio Comm., 59 App.D.C. 129, 36 F.2d 115." "No state lines divide the radio waves, and national regulation is not only appropriate but essential to the eff......
  • Bamberger Broadcasting Service v. Orloff
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 3, 1942
    ...a licensee has no proprietary interest in the letters WOR. This contention is wholly without merit. In City of New York v. Federal Radio Commission, 59 App.D.C. 129, 36 F.2d 115, 116, it was contended by the municipality that it had acquired a property right to operate its station (WNYC) at......
  • Technical Radio Laboratory v. Federal Radio Commission
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • November 4, 1929
    ... ... J., at a distance less than 50 miles from the various broadcasting stations at or near the city of New York. It also appears that station WTRL is limited by the terms of its license to a power of 15 watts and a wave length of 206 meters. It is ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT