City of Norwalk v. Van Dyke
| Decision Date | 06 October 1976 |
| Citation | 364 A.2d 864,172 Conn. 681 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | CITY OF NORWALK v. Gigi A. VAN DYKE. |
Leonard E. Trojanowski, Jr., Asst. Corp. Counsel, Norwalk, in support of the petition.
Raymond W. Ganin, Stratford, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Session of the Superior Court is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Enquist v. General Datacom
...than vigilant in safeguarding their own legal rights." Norwalk v. Van Dyke, 33 Conn.Supp. 661, 667, 366 A.2d 554, cert. denied, 172 Conn. 681, 364 A.2d 864 (1976). The prohibition against double recovery should not be invoked in this case to protect employers who fail to assert their rights......
-
Reichert v. Sheridan
...Co., 204 Conn. 485, 490, 528 A.2d 826 (1987), quoting Norwalk v. Van Dyke, 33 Conn.Sup. 661, 667, 366 A.2d 554, cert. denied, 172 Conn. 681, 364 A.2d 864 (1976). II In light of the conclusion that no genuine issue of material fact existed regarding sufficiency of the notice, we must now con......
-
Libby v. Goodwin Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc.
...against an employee either by statute or common law. Norwalk v. Van Dyke, 33 Conn.Sup. 661, 666, 366 A.2d 554, cert. denied, 172 Conn. 681, 364 A.2d 864 (1976). Their sole means to assert any right against the plaintiff's third party recovery was by way of the procedure set forth in § 31-29......
-
Skitromo v. Meriden Yellow Cab Co., Inc.
...against an employee either by statute or common law. Norwalk v. Van Dyke, 33 Conn.Sup. 661, 666, 366 A.2d 554, cert. denied, 172 Conn. 681, 364 A.2d 864 (1976). Their sole means to assert any right against the plaintiff's third party recovery was by way of the procedure set forth in § 31-29......
Request a trial to view additional results