City of Oshkosh v. E. Wis. Elec. Co.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Writing for the CourtESCHWEILER
Citation178 N.W. 308,172 Wis. 85
Decision Date23 June 1920
PartiesCITY OF OSHKOSH v. EASTERN WISCONSIN ELECTRIC CO.

172 Wis. 85
178 N.W. 308

CITY OF OSHKOSH
v.
EASTERN WISCONSIN ELECTRIC CO.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 23, 1920.


Appeal from Circuit Court, Winnebago County; George W. Burnell, Judge.

Action by the City of Oshkosh against the Eastern Wisconsin Electric Company. From an order sustaining plaintiff's demurrer to its answer, defendant appeals. Affirmed and remanded.

Plaintiff sues to recover the sum of $1,000 alleged to be due July, 1917, from the defendant as successor to the Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company pursuant to the terms of a certain ordinance granted to and the acceptance thereof by such predecessor in 1903. Defendant answered, and plaintiff's demurrer to such answer was sustained by the trial court.

[178 N.W. 309]

The following are the facts:

November 10, 1903, the common council of plaintiff granted to the Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company a franchise to extend its interurban electric railroad from the city of Fond du Lac into the city of Oshkosh.

The ordinance granted the right to lay tracks and operate its cars upon certain streets in the city of Oshkosh and over and upon a bridge on Main street in said city.

Among the terms of said ordinance was a provision by which the said Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company, its successors and assigns, was to pay the city of Oshkosh the sum of $35,000 in annual payments of $1,000 on or before the 1st day of July of each of the following 35 years.

January 19, 1904, the said Railway & Light Company by its officers accepted said franchise by a writing which contained, among other things, the following:

“And the said Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company does further specifically agree and bind itself, its successors and assigns, to the payment of the full sum of $35,000 as provided in said ordinance; that is to say, does hereby agree to pay said sum in equal annual installments of $1,000, each installment to be paid on or before the 1st day of July in each year during the term of said franchise.”

Such annual payments were made up to and including July 1, 1916.

It is alleged in the complaint that the consideration for the annual payment of $1,000 so provided for was agreed to be for the use of said streets and to partially compensate the plaintiff for the wear and tear on said Main street bridge resulting from the operation of said interurban cars over said bridge. No reference is made in the amended answer of defendant to the foregoing allegation other than as may be embraced in the general denial.

March 1, 1917, the defendant, Eastern Wisconsin Electric Company, succeeded to the rights of the Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company under the franchise aforesaid, and by purchase became the owner of the property then owned by said Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company, including the interurban railway, and has operated and intends to continue operating the same in the future.

On March 8, 1917, the defendant surrendered such franchise so acquired by it together with others and received by operation of law in lieu of said franchises an indeterminate permit under section 1797t3, Stats.

Defendant alleges that it is now conducting and operating its street and interurban railway business in the city of Oshkosh by virtue of said indeterminate permit only, and not by virtue of the foregoing or any franchise, license, or permit granted by any ordinance of the city of Oshkosh.

To the amended answer the plaintiff demurred, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • Milwaukee Elec. Ry. & Light Co. v. City of Milwaukee
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • February 8, 1921
    ...that the agreement to furnish free current has not been superseded by the public utility statute. City of Oshkosh v. Eastern Wis. E. Co., 178 N. W. 308. In that case the city of Oshkosh granted to a street railway company a franchise to extend its interurban electric railroad from the city ......
  • Crawford v. Duluth St. Ry. Co., No. 4618.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • June 30, 1932
    ...has drawn a distinction between a surrender of a street car franchise and that of other utilities. City of Oshkosh v. Eastern Wis. E. Co., 172 Wis. 85, 90, 178 N. W. 308; Calumet Service Co. v. Chilton, 148 Wis. 334, 354, 135 N. W. 131; La Crosse v. La Crosse Gas & Electric Co., 145 Wis. 40......
  • City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • February 3, 1959
    ...the ordinances here to be regulatory measures, the trial court relied upon City of Oshkosh v. Eastern Wisconsin Electric Co., 1920, 172 Wis. 85, 178 N.W. 308, 310. There the city, in granting a franchise to the defendant to extend its interurban electric railroad from Fond du Lac to Oshkosh......
  • Chi. & Milwaukee Elec. Ry. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Wis.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • April 12, 1949
    ...held in City of LaCrosse v. LaCrosse Gas & Electric Co., 145 Wis. 408, 130 N.W. 530 and City of Oshkosh v. Eastern Wisconsin Electric Co., 172 Wis. 85, 178 N.W. 308 there is a clear distinction between street and urban railways and general utilities. Railways serve termini and use public st......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Milwaukee Elec. Ry. & Light Co. v. City of Milwaukee
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • February 8, 1921
    ...that the agreement to furnish free current has not been superseded by the public utility statute. City of Oshkosh v. Eastern Wis. E. Co., 178 N. W. 308. In that case the city of Oshkosh granted to a street railway company a franchise to extend its interurban electric railroad from the city ......
  • Crawford v. Duluth St. Ry. Co., No. 4618.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • June 30, 1932
    ...has drawn a distinction between a surrender of a street car franchise and that of other utilities. City of Oshkosh v. Eastern Wis. E. Co., 172 Wis. 85, 90, 178 N. W. 308; Calumet Service Co. v. Chilton, 148 Wis. 334, 354, 135 N. W. 131; La Crosse v. La Crosse Gas & Electric Co., 145 Wis. 40......
  • City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • February 3, 1959
    ...the ordinances here to be regulatory measures, the trial court relied upon City of Oshkosh v. Eastern Wisconsin Electric Co., 1920, 172 Wis. 85, 178 N.W. 308, 310. There the city, in granting a franchise to the defendant to extend its interurban electric railroad from Fond du Lac to Oshkosh......
  • Chi. & Milwaukee Elec. Ry. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Wis.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • April 12, 1949
    ...held in City of LaCrosse v. LaCrosse Gas & Electric Co., 145 Wis. 408, 130 N.W. 530 and City of Oshkosh v. Eastern Wisconsin Electric Co., 172 Wis. 85, 178 N.W. 308 there is a clear distinction between street and urban railways and general utilities. Railways serve termini and use public st......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT