City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

Decision Date01 August 2001
Citation780 A.2d 601,566 Pa. 230
PartiesThe CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Petitioner, v. The PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, Joseph T. Ashdale, Michael A. Cibik, Catherine Marshall, Alfred W. Taubenberger, Russell R. Wagner, Karen M. Wrigley, Respondents.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court
ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2001, the Emergency Application for Stay seeking relief as of July 23, 2001, is hereby DENIED as moot. The Petition for King's Bench is hereby DENIED.

The appeal shall be entertained on an expedited basis and the prothonotary is directed to issue a briefing schedule in accordance therewith. The parties should concentrate their argument on the question of whether the Commonwealth Court had original jurisdiction to entertain this action. Further implementation of Act 22 of 2001 is stayed pending resolution of this appeal.

Justices NEWMAN and SAYLOR dissent from that portion of the order staying further implementation of Act 22 of 2001 pending the resolution of the appeal.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • City of Philadelphia v. Schweiker
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • September 22, 2004
    ...board, although this Court did stay further implementation of the challenged amendments. See City of Phila. v. Philadelphia Parking Auth., 566 Pa. 230, 780 A.2d 601 (2001) (per curiam). Thereafter, this Court vacated the Commonwealth Court's dismissal order, remanded the matter for consider......
  • Com. v. Grant
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • August 2, 2001

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT