City of Prichard v. Harold
Decision Date | 10 May 1938 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 282. |
Citation | 186 So. 499,28 Ala.App. 235 |
Parties | CITY OF PRICHARD v HAROLD. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied June 7, 1938.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; J. Blocker Thornton Judge.
Action by R. M. Harold against the City of Prichard to recover license taxes paid under an alleged invalid ordinance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Reversed rendered, and remanded.
Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in City of Prichard v Harold (1 Div. 14) 186 So. 504.
George Sossaman, of Mobile, for appellant.
Harry T. Smith & Caffey, of Mobile, for appellee.
On January 16, 1934, the city of Prichard adopted an ordinance containing, pertinently here, the following, to wit:
On the same day it adopted another ordinance parts of which we quote, to wit:
Appellee sued appellant for a refund of moneys paid by him to it under the provisions of the ordinance last quoted from --he operating a filling station, dispensing, among other things, gasoline, outside the corporate limits but within the police jurisdiction of said city.
The sole material question involved is the constitutional validity of the ordinance under which he made the payments.
It is conceded that the ordinance is "externally valid"--meaning by that that there is no question raised as to its proper adoption, promulgation, etc.
The attack on the ordinance is on the ground that it is one for the purpose of raising revenue (not permissible, as will appear) rather than one for police regulation etc.
As has been succinctly said for our Supreme Court by Mr. Justice Brown:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Wilkinson v. Murphy
... ... Gray v. Johnson, ... 235 Ala. 405, 179 So. 221; Walden v. City of ... Montgomery, 214 Ala. 409, 108 So. 231; Miller v ... Marx, 55 Ala. 322 ... ...
-
Franks v. City of Jasper
...certiorari denied, 233 Ala. 410, 172 So. 295; Alabama Power Co. v. City of Carbon Hill, 234 Ala. 489, 175 So. 289; City of Prichard v. Harold, 28 Ala.App. 235, 186 So. 499, certiorari denied, 237 Ala. 277, 186 So. 504; City of Andalusia v. Fletcher, 240 Ala. 110, 198 So. 64; City of Prichar......
-
Dixie Finance Co. v. City of Demopolis
...of Birmingham v. Wilson, supra [27 Ala.App. 288, 172 So. 292, certiorari denied, 233 Ala. 410, 172 So. 295]; City of Prichard v. Harold, supra [28 Ala.App. 235, 186 So. 499, certiorari denied, 237 Ala. 277, 186 So. 504]; City of Andalusia v. Fletcher, supra [240 Ala. 110, 198 So. 64]; City ......
-
City of Prichard v. Richardson
...of revenue derived from the ordinances, which makes this case different from the foregoing cases, except possibly the case of City of Prichard v. Harold, supra. On the issue here discussed, each case must on its own particular facts. We have carefully examined the evidence both as to the am......