City of Providence v. Payne
Decision Date | 30 June 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 713.,713. |
Citation | 134 A. 276 |
Parties | CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. PAYNE et al. |
Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
Case Certified from Superior Court, Providence and Bristol Counties.
Suit by the City of Providence against Mary Dexter Payne and another to construe the will of Ebenezer Knight Dexter, deceased. Bill certified to Supreme Court for determination. Decree advised.
Elmer S. Chace, City Sol., and Ellis L. Yatman and Francis D. McManus, Asst. City Sols., all of Providence, for complainant.
Thomas A. Jenckes, of Providence, for Mary Dexter Payne and George Robert Payne.
Greenough, Easton & Cross, of Providence, for certain respondents freemen of Providence.
This is a bill in equity asking for the construction of certain provisions of the will of Ebenezer Knight Dexter, deceased, late of the town of Providence, and for instructions relative thereto. In accordance with the provision of the statute the bill as amended has been certified to this court for determination.
The respondents named in the bill are the collateral heirs of the testator, and the "freemen" of Providence. Answers to the amended bill have been filed in behalf of said heirs and by certain of the "freemen" of Providence. At the hearing before us oral arguments were made and briefs filed in behalf of said respondents.
The testator died a resident of the town of Providence August 10, 1824, and his will was duly probated in said town on August 30, 1824. After making a number of private bequests, the testator in the sixteenth paragraph of the will devised to the town of Providence a large tract of land lying in the town for use as a "training field." This tract is still maintained in accordance with the provisions of the will, and is known as the Dexter Training Ground.
The provisions of the will with regard to which construction is now sought are contained in the seventeenth and eighteenth paragraphs thereof and read as follows:
The town at a special town meeting held on November 24, 1824, accepted the "donation" of the testator by resolutions, of which the following is a part:
"Resolved, that the conditions under which the said donation to the town of Providence is in & by the said last will & testament devised & bequeathed, are altogether judicious and just, and as such, are accepted & ought to be performed by said town; and the faith of the said town of Providence is hereby solemnly pledged to the true and just performance of the said conditions in every particular thereof, according to the provisions of said last will & testament."
In 1828 the town of Providence, at its own expense, erected an asylum building upon the Neck farm, and immediately devoted it to the use and accommodation of the poor of the town. This asylum building, together with other buildings erected upon the farm since that time, has continued to be devoted solely to that use. The town also at its expense erected a wall around the farm in exact compliance with the specifications of the testator contained in the seventeenth paragraph of his will. This farm, surrounded by its high stone wall, has continued down to the present time as one of the landmarks of the town and the city of Providence, and is known as the Dexter Asylum. By reason of the growth of Providence, it is now surrounded by a valuable residential section of the city. Until the incorporation of the town of Providence as a city in 1831, the Dexter donation, so-called, was managed in accordance with the directions of the town meeting of the freemen of the town and the "rents, profits and income thereof" applied solely to the support and maintenance of the poor of the town.
Since the incorporation of the city of Providence, the freemen of that city have held town meetings at least once in every year, and at said town meetings have conducted, controlled, and administered the property known as the Dexter donation. It appears in the agreed statement of facts that in every respect the town and the city of Providence have with great care administered the Dexter donation, including the Neck farm, known as the Dexter Asylum, in strict conformity with the provisions of the devises under the seventeenth and eighteenth paragraphs of the will.
A large portion of the asylum property has, up to the present time, been conducted for profit as a farm. It is stated that now by reason of existing conditions in the farming industry that portion of the asylum property cannot longer be so operated with profit in these circumstances, at the instance of the city council of Providence, this bill has been instituted for the construction of the seventeenth and eighteenth paragraphs with particular reference to the following questions stated in the bill:
To continue reading
Request your trial- Yale University v. City of New Haven
-
State ex rel. Goddard v. Coerver
...found the existence of a fee simple In trust. See e.g., Harris v. Emmerling, 224 Ark. 40, 271 S.W.2d 618 (1954); City of Providence v. Payne, 47 R.I. 444, 134 A. 276 (1926); Kibbe v. City of Rochester, 57 F.2d 542 (W.D.N.Y.1932); Packard v. Old Colony R.R. Co., 168 Mass. 92, 46 N.E. 433 (18......
-
Congregation Jeshuat Israel v. Congregation Shearith Israel
...determining whether the intention to create a charitable trust exists should not be derailed by formalism. See City of Providence v. Payne, 47 R.I. 444, 134 A. 276, 280 (1926) (counseling that equity favors charitable trusts). The Court must rely on the totality of the "circumstances which ......
-
Bliven v. Borden
...are favored and are liberally construed so that a testator's clearly intended purpose may be carried into effect. City of Providence v. Payne, 47 R.I. 444, 134 A. 276. The town council of Portsmouth is the body which in general administers the affairs of that town, and it may well be that t......