City of Snoqualmie v. King County Exec. Constantine

Docket Number91534-2
Decision Date22 December 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • Volk v. Demeerleer
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • December 22, 2016
    ... ... Hertog v. City of Seattle , 138 Wash.2d 265, 276, 979 P.2d 400 ... Little v. King , 160 Wash.2d 696, 705, 161 P.3d 345 (2007) ... ...
  • Wash. Bankers Ass'n v. State
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • September 30, 2021
    ...question we review de novo. Wash. State Hous. Fin. Comm'n , 193 Wash.2d at 711, 445 P.3d 533 (citing City of Snoqualmie v. Constantine , 187 Wash.2d 289, 296, 386 P.3d 279 (2016) ). ¶ 77 The UDJA is a remedial statute and is to be "liberally construed and administered." RCW 7.24.120. Standi......
  • King Cnty. v. King Cnty. Water Districts Nos. 20, 45, 49, 90, 111, 119, 125
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • December 5, 2019
    ...at 30-31, 47-48 (same). But as City of Snoqualmie v. Constantine makes clear, those cases are not on point here. 187 Wash.2d 289, 386 P.3d 279 (2016).¶20 In Covell, we designed a three-factor test3 to help courts distinguish taxes from regulatory fees, a distinction that can be decisive. 12......
  • Wash. State Hous. Fin. Comm'n v. Nat'l Homebuyers Fund, Inc.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • July 25, 2019
    ...Lake, 150 Wash.2d 791, 802, 83 P.3d 419 (2004). Standing is a question of law that we review de novo. City of Snoqualmie v. Constantine, 187 Wash.2d 289, 296, 386 P.3d 279 (2016). ¶15 We have established a two part standing test in order to establish that a party’s "rights, status or other ......
  • Get Started for Free