City of Watertown v. Hagy

Decision Date16 June 1970
Docket NumberNo. 10600,10600
Citation85 S.D. 117,177 N.W.2d 736
PartiesCITY OF WATERTOWN, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Arthur HAGY, Defendant and Appellant.
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

Loucks, Oviatt, Bradshaw & Green, Watertown, for defendant and appellant.

Dean Sumner, Watertown, for plaintiff and respondent.

HANSON, Judge.

Defendant was found guilty of violating an ordinance of the City of Watertown relating to the regulation and licensing of transient and itinerant photographers. On appeal he asserts the unconstitutionality of the ordinance. The City of Watertown failed to appear or file a brief in opposition.

The challenged ordinance is as follows:

'12.0301: LICENSE REQUIRED.

It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of a transient or itinerant photographer, canvasser or solicitor of photographs or pictures or enlargements of the same, taken, photographed or otherwise made, prepared or enlarged and sold or delivered or for the transaction of any business in connection therewith, within this City without having first obtained a license so to do. (C--359--1)

'12.0302: 'TRANSIENT' AND 'ITINERANT' DEFINED.

The terms 'transient' and 'itinerant' shall be deemed to mean and include all persons, both principals and agents, who engage in and conduct within this city, either in one locality, or traveling from house to house or place to place, a temporary or transient business, with the intention of continuing in such business in any one place for a period of not more than 180 days. (C--359--2)

'12.0303: 'CANVASSER' and 'SOLICITOR' DEFINED.

The terms 'canvasser' and 'solicitor' shall be deemed to mean and include any person who goes from house to house or from place to place in this City selling or taking orders for, or offering to sell or take orders for photographs, pictures, or enlargements thereof, for future delivery. (C--359--3)

'12.0304: LICENSE FEE.

No person shall deal as a transient and itinerant photographer, canvasser and/or solicitor of photographs or pictures or enlargements of the same without having procured the licenses herein required, and no two or more persons shall deal under the same license as partner, agent or otherwise. The license fee for transient and itinerant photographer, canvasser and/or solicitor of photographs or pictures or enlargements of the same shall be Ten Dollars a day. (C--359--4)

'12.0305: APPLICATION.

The applicant for any license provided by this Chapter shall on application for such license state the name of the applicant, permanent address of applicant, length of residence in the state, whether he transacts business for himself or someone else, and if for someone else, the name and address of person, firm or corporation he represents, copies of the contract and agreement he intends to make with the customer, and how he intends to operate in this City. (C--359--5)

'12.0306: BOND.

The applicant for any license provided by this Chapter before receiving a license shall file in the office of the City Auditor a bond in the penal sum of Five Hundred Dollars for the faithful performance and obligation of said applicant arising in connection with his business, and for payment of all claims for damages for which he may become liable through fraud, deceit, or otherwise in the course of his business. (C--359--6)

'12.0307: NO CALLS EXCEPT UPON REQUEST.

The practice of going in or upon private residence property in this City by transient or itinerant photographers, canvassers, or solicitors of photographs or pictures or enlargements of the same not having been requested or invited so to do by the owner or owners, occupant or occupants, of said private residences for such business purposes is hereby prohibited and declared to be unlawful. (C--359--7)'

The stipulated facts show defendant was arrested on May 17, 1968 and charged with violating the above ordinance. The alleged offense occurred at a Lutheran Church in Watertown where defendant was taking photographs without having applied for or obtained a transient photographer's license or bond.

At the time defendant was engaged in a 'transient or itinerant' business as defined by the ordinance. He was furthermore, an agent or employee of United Church Directories, an Ohio Corporation. Negatives of pictures taken by him were to be mailed to the home office in Ohio for processing and were then to be mailed back to the Lutheran Church in Watertown for use. The business constituted interstate commerce.

In was further stipulated that no license fee is required of or imposed upon photographers located in the City of Watertown, South Dakota.

In view of the stipulated facts the only issue of consequence is whether the Ordinance imposes an undue burden on interstate commerce. In construing similar municipal ordinances in recent years, most courts have found them to be discriminatory and in violation of the Commerce Clause of the Federal...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT