Claassen v. City and County of Denver, No. 99CA1165.

Decision Date26 October 2000
Docket NumberNo. 99CA1165.
Citation30 P.3d 710
PartiesCarl L. CLAASSEN and Susan D. Claassen; Linda T. Kaysen and Edward L. Kaysen, Jr.; Thompson P. Stanfield and Carol U. Stanfield; Michael S. Katz and Holly Kim Katz; Joseph R. Ross; Mark Black and Peggy Tabor; Julie L. Roubidoux and Jodie E. Hogan; Bobby L. McGee and Sandra McGee; Kay Banta and Holly Kim Katz; and Rodney G. Lambertson and Carolyn L. Lambertson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a body politic and corporate of the State of Colorado, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • City of Colo. Springs v. Andersen Mahon Enterprises
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • April 1, 2010
    ...v. Grynberg, 846 P.2d 175, 178–79 (Colo.1993) (quoting Lipson, 41 Colo.App. at 569, 588 P.2d at 391); Claassen v. City & County of Denver, 30 P.3d 710, 712 (Colo.App.2000). Physical invasion is not required for a plaintiff to state a claim for relief in inverse condemnation proceedings. Whe......
  • Young v. Larimer Cnty. Sheriff's Office
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • September 11, 2014
    ...a procedure to seek relief for violation of certain federal constitutional and statutory provisions.” Claassen v. City & County of Denver, 30 P.3d 710, 715 (Colo.App.2000) ; see also Monez v. Reinertson, 140 P.3d 242, 244 (Colo.App.2006) (“To seek redress through § 1983, a plaintiff must as......
9 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 2 - § 2.4 • CONSTITUENTS OF REAL PROPERTY
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Real Property Law (CBA) Chapter 2 Real Property
    • Invalid date
    ...685 (Colo. 1906) (fishing).[202] Thompson v. City & County of Denver, 958 P.2d 525 (Colo. App. 1998); Claassen v. City & County of Denver, 30 P.3d 710 (Colo. App. 2000). For navigable airspace, see 40 U.S.C. § 40102(30) (defining "navigable airspace") and 14 C.F.R. § 91.119 (2003) (prescrib......
  • Aerial Trespass and the Fourth Amendment.
    • United States
    • Michigan Law Review Vol. 121 No. 7, May 2023
    • May 1, 2023
    ...Id. at 263-64. (89.) See, e.g., McCarran Int'l Airport v. Sisolak, 137 P.3d 1110 (Nev. 2006); Claassen v. City & Cnty. of Denver, 30 P.3d 710, 712 (Colo. App. 2000); Thompson v. City & Cnty. of Denver, 958 P.2d 525, 526-28 (Colo. App. (90.) Restatement (Second) of Torts [section] 15......
  • Chapter 5 - § 5.7 • REGULATORY TAKINGS
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Land Planning and Development Law (CBA) Chapter 5 Exactions, Dedications, Impact Fees, and Regulatory Takings
    • Invalid date
    ...v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994); Nollan v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, 483 U.S. 825 (1987). [73] Claassen v. City & County of Denver, 30 P.3d 710 (Colo. App. 2000).[74] Van Wyk, 27 P.3d 377.[75] Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Fla. Dep't of Envtl. Prot., 560 U.S. 702 (2010).[76] City ......
  • Chapter 35 - § 35.2 • EMINENT DOMAIN UNDER STATE LAW
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Real Property Law (CBA) Chapter 35 Eminent Domain
    • Invalid date
    ...App. 1998); Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1 v. City of Boulder, 992 P.2d 1188 (Colo. App. 1999); Claassen v. City & County of Denver, 30 P.3d 710 (Colo. App. 2000); Scott v. County of Custer, 178 P.3d 1240 (Colo. App. 2007). [76] Animas Valley Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT