Clack v. Jones
Decision Date | 16 August 1943 |
Docket Number | 3394. |
Citation | 140 P.2d 580,62 Nev. 72 |
Parties | CLACK v. JONES. |
Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Sept. 20, 1943.
See 141 P.2d 385.
Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Pershing County; Thomas J. D. Salter, Judge.
Action by C. H. Jones against G. S. Clack, wherein judgment was rendered against defendant and he was ordered to appear to answer concerning his property. From orders requiring defendant to appear and show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt, overruling defendant's objections to judge presiding at contempt proceeding ordered by such judge, and denying his motion to set aside such order and permit defendant to file an answer to appear for trial before another judge and from judgment upon his appearance bond, defendant appeals. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal and to strike a demurrer filed in Supreme Court to affidavit charging contempt.
Demurrer stricken and appeal dismissed.
William S. Boyle, of Reno, for appellant.
H. J Murrish and John A. Jurgenson, both of Lovelock, for respondent.
In this action proceedings were had in the district court to require the appellant, judgment debtor, to appear before the judge of the court to answer concerning his property, and to bring with him all books and records of the Cinnabar City Mining Company. In the course of the proceedings appellant having failed to appear as required, a warrant of arrest was issued for him in which it was ordered that he be brought before the judge of the court to show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt of court. It was further ordered that he be admitted to bail in the sum of $500. Thereafter appellant filed in the proceedings his objection to Judge Thomas J. D. Salter presiding at any contempt proceeding wherein an order of attachment was issued by said judge.
On April 13, 1943 it was ordered as follows:
A motion by appellant to set aside the foregoing order and to permit him to file an answer to appear for trial before another judge was denied on April 27, 1943.
He has appealed from these orders and judgment.
Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal and to strike a written demurrer to his...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Madden v. Madden
...570 (1925); Paulson v. Johnson, 241 Minn. 202, 7 N.W.2d 338 (1943); Bond v. Anderson, 203 Miss. 283 33 So.2d 833 (1948); Clack v. Jones, 62 Nev. 72, 140 P.2d 580 (1943), reh. den. 62 Nev. 76, 141 P.2d 385 (1943); Adams v. Adams, 80 N.J.Eq. 175, 83 A. 190 (1912); Zellers v. Huff, 57 N.M. 609......
-
G. and M. Properties v. Second Judicial Dist. Court In and For Washoe County
...the trial court is alleged to have exceeded its jurisdiction and the challenged order is not appealable. NRAP 3A(b); Clack v. Jones, 62 Nev. 72, 140 P.2d 580 (1943). Petitioners contend that the district court is without jurisdiction to consider the late filed exceptions of Bailey and Livin......
-
Koch v. Koch
...§§ 31, 36, 2 N.C.L. 1931-1941 Supp., §§ 9385.81, 9385.86, pp. 1258, 1261; In re Powell's Estate, 62 Nev.121, 144 P.2d 996; Clack v. Jones, 62 Nev. 72, 140 P.2d 580; Lewis v. Williams, 61 Nev. 253, 123 P.2d 730, P.2d 305; McGill v. Lewis, 61 Nev. 28, 111 P.2d 537, 116 P.2d 581, 118 P.2d 702;......
-
Ham v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, In and For Clark County, 9536
...order of disqualification of a judge is not an appealable order in the "ordinary course of law", NRAP 3A(b), see Clack v. Jones, 62 Nev. 72, 140 P.2d 580 (1943), Petitioner is, therefore, without a "plain, speedy and adequate remedy at law." The unavailability of a valid legal basis for rev......