Clark v. Adair Cnty.
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
Writing for the Court | MARTIN |
Citation | 79 Mo. 536 |
Decision Date | 31 October 1883 |
Parties | CLARK, Plaintiff in Error, v. ADAIR COUNTY. |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 practice notes
-
Zoll v. St. Louis County, No. 34970.
...the plaintiff's property in this case has been either taken or damaged for the public use in any sense whatever." Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536, was an action for damages resulting from the collapse of a bridge in a public road. The facts are quite like those in the Pundman case, supra.......
-
O'Dell v. School Dist. of Independence, No. 57474
...of the state are not subject to liability in suits for negligence. Reardon v. St. Louis County, 36 Mo. 555; Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536; State ex rel. Jordon v. Haynes, 72 Mo. 377; Cassidy v. City of St. Joseph, 247 Mo. 197, 152 S.W. 306; Lamar v. Bolivar Special Road District, Mo.Sup......
-
Max v. Drainage District, No. 28799.
...S.W. 50; Sherwood v. Worth County Drainage District, 250 S.W. (Mo.) 605; Swineford v. Franklin County, 73 Mo. 279; Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536; Pundman v. St. Charles County, 100 Mo. 594; Reed v. Howell County, 125 Mo. 58; Cochran v. Wilson, 229 S.W. (Mo.) 1052; Gibson v. United State......
-
Bd. of Com'rs of Jasper Cnty. v. Allman
...v. Mason Co., 87 Ky. 208, 8 S. W. 264;Reardon v. St. Louis Co., 36 Mo. 555;Swineford v. Franklin Co., 73 Mo. 279;Clark v. Adair Co., 79 Mo. 536;Gilman v. Contra Costa Co., 8 Cal. 52;Id., 68 Am. Dec. 290, and note on pages 294 and 295; Barnett v. Contra Costa Co., 67 Cal. 77, 7 Pac. 177;Scal......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
-
Zoll v. St. Louis County, No. 34970.
...the plaintiff's property in this case has been either taken or damaged for the public use in any sense whatever." Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536, was an action for damages resulting from the collapse of a bridge in a public road. The facts are quite like those in the Pundman case, supra.......
-
O'Dell v. School Dist. of Independence, No. 57474
...of the state are not subject to liability in suits for negligence. Reardon v. St. Louis County, 36 Mo. 555; Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536; State ex rel. Jordon v. Haynes, 72 Mo. 377; Cassidy v. City of St. Joseph, 247 Mo. 197, 152 S.W. 306; Lamar v. Bolivar Special Road District, Mo.Sup......
-
Max v. Drainage District, No. 28799.
...S.W. 50; Sherwood v. Worth County Drainage District, 250 S.W. (Mo.) 605; Swineford v. Franklin County, 73 Mo. 279; Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536; Pundman v. St. Charles County, 100 Mo. 594; Reed v. Howell County, 125 Mo. 58; Cochran v. Wilson, 229 S.W. (Mo.) 1052; Gibson v. United State......
-
Bd. of Com'rs of Jasper Cnty. v. Allman
...v. Mason Co., 87 Ky. 208, 8 S. W. 264;Reardon v. St. Louis Co., 36 Mo. 555;Swineford v. Franklin Co., 73 Mo. 279;Clark v. Adair Co., 79 Mo. 536;Gilman v. Contra Costa Co., 8 Cal. 52;Id., 68 Am. Dec. 290, and note on pages 294 and 295; Barnett v. Contra Costa Co., 67 Cal. 77, 7 Pac. 177;Scal......
Request a trial to view additional results