Clark v. Adair Cnty.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri
Writing for the CourtMARTIN
Citation79 Mo. 536
Decision Date31 October 1883
PartiesCLARK, Plaintiff in Error, v. ADAIR COUNTY.
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 practice notes
  • Zoll v. St. Louis County, No. 34970.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • February 8, 1939
    ...the plaintiff's property in this case has been either taken or damaged for the public use in any sense whatever." Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536, was an action for damages resulting from the collapse of a bridge in a public road. The facts are quite like those in the Pundman case, supra.......
  • O'Dell v. School Dist. of Independence, No. 57474
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 10, 1975
    ...of the state are not subject to liability in suits for negligence. Reardon v. St. Louis County, 36 Mo. 555; Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536; State ex rel. Jordon v. Haynes, 72 Mo. 377; Cassidy v. City of St. Joseph, 247 Mo. 197, 152 S.W. 306; Lamar v. Bolivar Special Road District, Mo.Sup......
  • Max v. Drainage District, No. 28799.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • November 18, 1930
    ...S.W. 50; Sherwood v. Worth County Drainage District, 250 S.W. (Mo.) 605; Swineford v. Franklin County, 73 Mo. 279; Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536; Pundman v. St. Charles County, 100 Mo. 594; Reed v. Howell County, 125 Mo. 58; Cochran v. Wilson, 229 S.W. (Mo.) 1052; Gibson v. United State......
  • Bd. of Com'rs of Jasper Cnty. v. Allman
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • November 25, 1895
    ...v. Mason Co., 87 Ky. 208, 8 S. W. 264;Reardon v. St. Louis Co., 36 Mo. 555;Swineford v. Franklin Co., 73 Mo. 279;Clark v. Adair Co., 79 Mo. 536;Gilman v. Contra Costa Co., 8 Cal. 52;Id., 68 Am. Dec. 290, and note on pages 294 and 295; Barnett v. Contra Costa Co., 67 Cal. 77, 7 Pac. 177;Scal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
  • Zoll v. St. Louis County, No. 34970.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • February 8, 1939
    ...the plaintiff's property in this case has been either taken or damaged for the public use in any sense whatever." Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536, was an action for damages resulting from the collapse of a bridge in a public road. The facts are quite like those in the Pundman case, supra.......
  • O'Dell v. School Dist. of Independence, No. 57474
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 10, 1975
    ...of the state are not subject to liability in suits for negligence. Reardon v. St. Louis County, 36 Mo. 555; Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536; State ex rel. Jordon v. Haynes, 72 Mo. 377; Cassidy v. City of St. Joseph, 247 Mo. 197, 152 S.W. 306; Lamar v. Bolivar Special Road District, Mo.Sup......
  • Max v. Drainage District, No. 28799.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • November 18, 1930
    ...S.W. 50; Sherwood v. Worth County Drainage District, 250 S.W. (Mo.) 605; Swineford v. Franklin County, 73 Mo. 279; Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536; Pundman v. St. Charles County, 100 Mo. 594; Reed v. Howell County, 125 Mo. 58; Cochran v. Wilson, 229 S.W. (Mo.) 1052; Gibson v. United State......
  • Bd. of Com'rs of Jasper Cnty. v. Allman
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • November 25, 1895
    ...v. Mason Co., 87 Ky. 208, 8 S. W. 264;Reardon v. St. Louis Co., 36 Mo. 555;Swineford v. Franklin Co., 73 Mo. 279;Clark v. Adair Co., 79 Mo. 536;Gilman v. Contra Costa Co., 8 Cal. 52;Id., 68 Am. Dec. 290, and note on pages 294 and 295; Barnett v. Contra Costa Co., 67 Cal. 77, 7 Pac. 177;Scal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT