Clark v. Com., 2248-94-3

Decision Date25 February 1997
Docket NumberNo. 2248-94-3,2248-94-3
PartiesTimothy CLARK, s/k/a Timothy Lamont Clark, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee. Record
CourtVirginia Court of Appeals

Robert Bryan Haskins, Dry Fork (Turner, Haskins & Whitfield, Chatham, on brief), for appellant.

Monica S. McElyea, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Before MOON, C.J., and BAKER, BENTON, COLEMAN, WILLIS, BRAY, FITZPATRICK, ANNUNZIATA and OVERTON, JJ.

Upon Rehearing En Banc

By opinion dated July 16, 1996, a majority of a panel of this Court affirmed the decision of the trial court. Clark v. Commonwealth, 22 Va.App. 673, 472 S.E.2d 663 (1996). Upon motion of Timothy Clark, we granted a rehearing en banc. Upon such rehearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for those reasons set forth in the panel's majority opinion, and accordingly, the stay of this Court's July 16, 1996 mandate is lifted.

Judge Benton would reverse the judgment of the trial court for those reasons set forth in the panel's dissenting opinion. See id. at 678, 472 S.E.2d at 665 (Benton, J., dissenting).

It is ordered that the trial court allow counsel for the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered the appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel's costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. This amount shall be added to the costs due the Commonwealth in the July 16, 1996 mandate.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • United States v. Bernel-Aveja
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 13, 2016
    ...a store in all innocence").147 See Clark v. Commonwealth , 22 Va.App. 673, 472 S.E.2d 663, 663 (Va. 1996), on reh'g , 24 Va.App. 253, 481 S.E.2d 495 (Va. 1997) (affirming burglary conviction when defendant entered store at night while it was open for business and committed theft while what ......
  • White v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • December 5, 2017
    ...783 (2004) (quoting Clark v. Commonwealth, 22 Va. App. 673, 683, 472 S.E.2d 663, 667-68 (1996), adopted upon reh'g en banc, 24 Va. App. 253, 481 S.E.2d 495 (1997) ).Under Code § 18.2-178.1(A) :It is unlawful for any person who knows or should know that another person suffers from mental inc......
  • Shreve v. Com.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • December 14, 2004
    ...at which it is directed. Clark v. Commonwealth, 22 Va.App. 673, 683, 472 S.E.2d 663, 667-68 (1996), aff'd on reh'g en banc, 24 Va.App. 253, 481 S.E.2d 495 (1997). These principles support the conclusion that the legislature intended to recognize separate violations of Code § 46.2-300 for (1......
  • Stegall v. Commonwealth, Record No. 1003-09-3 (Va. App. 4/6/2010)
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • April 6, 2010
    ...598 S.E.2d 783, 786 (2004). And in Clark v. Commonwealth, 22 Va. App. 673, 674, 472 S.E.2d 663, 664 (1996), aff'd en banc, 24 Va. App. 253, 481 S.E.2d 495 (1997), this Court affirmed the defendant's conviction for statutory burglary in violation of Code § 18.2-90 where the evidence showed t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT