Clark v. CONTINENTAL NAT. BANK & TRUST CO.
| Court | Appellate Court of Illinois |
| Writing for the Court | McCORMICK |
| Citation | Clark v. Cont'l Ill. Nat'l Bank and Trust Co., 68 Ill. App.2d 16, 215 N.E.2d 816 (Ill. App. 1966) |
| Decision Date | 11 February 1966 |
| Docket Number | Gen. No. 49,276. |
| Parties | George E. Clark, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a Banking Corporation, Individually and as Trustee of the Last Will and Testament of Lyman B. Kilbourne, Deceased, and Trustee of the Last Will and Testament of Katherine Kilbourne, a Co-Trustee of the Last Will and Testament of Charles A. Weaver, Deceased, Pleasant C. Hyson, Helen M. Sheridan, as Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of Homer C. Sheridan, Mrs. Charles A. Weaver, as Co-Trustee of the Last Will and Testament of Charles A. Weaver, Deceased, George H. Zendt, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
Irving Breakstone, of Chicago, for appellant.
Arvey, Hodes & Mantynband and Mayer, Friedlich, Spiess, Tierney, Brown & Platt, of Chicago (G. Gale Roberson and Patrick W. O'Brien, of counsel), for appell...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
People v. Kellas
...is not required when a witness is being cross-examined and the cross-examination is erroneously proscribed. (See Clark v. Continental (1966), 68 Ill.App.2d 16, 215 N.E.2d 816, Abst., 1st Dist. No. 49276, at page 11 of slip opinion.) Further, to say that prejudice can be established only by ......
-
State v. Entze
...243 Or. 158, 411 P.2d 1015 (1966); Tate v. Connel, 3 Ariz.App. 534, 416 P.2d 213 (1966); Clark v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company, 68 Ill.App.2d 16, 215 N.E.2d 816 (1966); Kemp v. Lormer, 87 Ohio App. 307, 94 N.E.2d 702 (1949); McKoy v. Enterkin, 181 Ga. 447, 182 S.E. 518......
-
Washington Nat. Ins. Co. v. Meeks
...243 Or. 158, 411 P.2d 1015 (1966); Tate v. Connel, 3 Ariz.App. 534, 416 P.2d 213 (1966); Clark v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company, 68 Ill.App.2d 16, 215 N.E.2d 816 (1966); Kemp v. Lormer, 87 Ohio App. 307, 94 N.E.2d 702 (1949); McKoy v. Enterkin, 181 Ga. 447, 182 S.E. 518......