Clark v. Murphy, No. 00-16727.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | O'Scannlain |
| Citation | 331 F.3d 1062 |
| Docket Number | No. 00-16727. |
| Decision Date | 10 June 2003 |
| Parties | Billy Russell CLARK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tim MURPHY, Respondent-Appellee. |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
750 practice notes
-
Detrich v. Ryan, No. 08–99001.
...what constitutes “clearly established” Supreme Court law and whether the state court applied that law unreasonably. Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1069 (9th Cir.2003), overruled on other grounds by Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003). Our analysis under ......
-
Ray v. Kernan, No. C 06-4556 SBA (pr).
...holding is an "unreasonable application" of Supreme Court precedent or to assess what law is "clearly established." Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1070-71 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968, 124 S.Ct. 446, 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003); Duhaime v. Ducharme, 200 F.3d 597, 600 (9th Cir.1999). 2......
-
Doody v. Ryan, No. 06–17161.
...a variety of psychologically coercive interrogating tactics.” Dissenting Opinion, p. 1045. The amalgamated citations to Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir.2003), Jenner v. Smith, 982 F.2d 329 (8th Cir.1993), United States v. Lehman, 468 F.2d 93 (7th Cir.1972), and [649 F.3d 1017] Unite......
-
Morales v. Scribner, No. 05-03545 JSW.
...objectively unreasonable standard is not a clear error standard. Page 818 Lockyer, 538 U.S. at 75-76, 123 S.Ct. 1166; Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1067-69 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968, 124 S.Ct. 446, 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003). After Lockyer, "[t]he writ may not issue simply becaus......
Request a trial to view additional results
749 cases
-
Detrich v. Ryan, No. 08–99001.
...what constitutes “clearly established” Supreme Court law and whether the state court applied that law unreasonably. Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1069 (9th Cir.2003), overruled on other grounds by Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003). Our analysis under ......
-
Ray v. Kernan, No. C 06-4556 SBA (pr).
...holding is an "unreasonable application" of Supreme Court precedent or to assess what law is "clearly established." Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1070-71 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968, 124 S.Ct. 446, 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003); Duhaime v. Ducharme, 200 F.3d 597, 600 (9th Cir.1999). 2......
-
Doody v. Ryan, No. 06–17161.
...a variety of psychologically coercive interrogating tactics.” Dissenting Opinion, p. 1045. The amalgamated citations to Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir.2003), Jenner v. Smith, 982 F.2d 329 (8th Cir.1993), United States v. Lehman, 468 F.2d 93 (7th Cir.1972), and [649 F.3d 1017] Unite......
-
Morales v. Scribner, No. 05-03545 JSW.
...objectively unreasonable standard is not a clear error standard. Page 818 Lockyer, 538 U.S. at 75-76, 123 S.Ct. 1166; Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1067-69 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968, 124 S.Ct. 446, 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003). After Lockyer, "[t]he writ may not issue simply becaus......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Law Enforcement Case Law
...v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972).Carroll v. U.S., 267 U.S. 132 (1925).Chambers v. Maroney,399 U.S. 42 (1970).Clark v. Murphy,331 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir. 01-23-03).Colorado v. Bertine, 379 U.S. 367 (1987).Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971).Davis v. North Carolina, 384 U.S. 737 (1966)......