Clarke v. Bazadone

Decision Date01 February 1803
Citation2 L.Ed. 285,5 U.S. 212,1 Cranch 212
PartiesCLARKE v. BAZADONE
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

WRIT of error to the general court of the territory north west of the river Ohio.

This court was established by an ordinance of the colonial congress, during the confederation. The only question decided in the case, was, whether the writ of error would lie.

The writ of error was quashed, on the ground that the act of congress establishing the territory had not authorized an appeal or writ of error, to the supreme court of the United States.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Gonzalez v. Astrue
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • February 21, 2012
  • Curless v. Watson
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 27, 1913
    ... ... Lease (1864), 22 Ind. 261; Board, etc. v ... Brown (1860), 14 Ind. 191, 193; Hornberger ... v. State (1854), 5 Ind. 300; Clarke v ... Bazadone (1803), 5 U.S. 212, 1 Cranch *212, 2 L.Ed ... 85, 95; Durousseau v. United States (1810), ... 6 Cranch *307, 3 L.Ed. 232; ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT