Clarke v. U.S.
| Citation | 898 F.2d 161 |
| Decision Date | 15 December 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-5439,88-5439 |
| Parties | David A. CLARKE, et al. v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia) |
Prior report: D.C.Cir., 886 F.2d 404.
Before EDWARDS and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges, and ROBINSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Upon consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing it is
ORDERED, by the Court, that the petition is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Clarke v. U.S.
...15, 1989, both the panel and the full court declined to rehear the case on the merits, but withheld the mandate. Clarke v. United States, 898 F.2d 161 (D.C.Cir.1989). The panel denied the proposed vacatur for mootness, but the full court ordered the mootness issue heard en We now decide tha......
-
Rodearmel v. Clinton
...L.Ed.2d 1060 (1968), and Clarke v. United States, 705 F.Supp. 605 (D.D.C.1988), aff'd, 886 F.2d 404 (D.C.Cir.1989), reh'g denied, 898 F.2d 161 (D.C.Cir.1989), vacated as moot, 915 F.2d 699 (D.C.Cir.1990), to support his standing based on the taking of his oath. In Allen, a New York law requ......
-
Mahoney v. Babbitt
...lapse of the appropriations act and the December 15, 1989, decision not to rehear the case on the merits. Clarke v. United States, 898 F.2d 161 (D.C.Cir.1989) (per curiam) (en banc). Hearing the suggestion of mootness en banc, we then held that the mootness did not result from a "voluntary ......