Clear v. Marvin

Decision Date05 July 1961
Docket NumberNo. 9050,9050
CitationClear v. Marvin, 363 P.2d 355, 83 Idaho 399 (Idaho 1961)
PartiesGerald A. CLEAR, Father of Nancy Joan Clear, a minor, now deceased, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Leland G. MARVIN, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtIdaho Supreme Court

Martinson & Gale, Moscow, Hawkins & Miller, Coeur d'Alene, for appellant.

McCarthy & Adams, Lewiston, Sharp & Bishop, Clarkston, Wash., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff(respondent) brought this action to recover damages from defendant(appellant) for the wrongful death of plaintiff's nine-year-old daughter, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant.Upon plaintiff's motion for a summary judgmentthe trial court found that the child's death was the result of gross negligence on the part of defendant; that the defendant was liable therefor as a matter of law; and that there was a genuine issue as to the amount of damages which the plaintiff is entitled to recover.Judgment was accordingly entered determining defendant's liability and that the only issue remaining to be resolved is the amount of plaintiff's damage.

Defendant brought this appeal from the judgment.On defendant's motion the district court stayed further proceedings in that court, pending appeal.

The cause is now before this court on plaintiff's motion to dismiss the appeal.The issue is governed by I.R.C.P., Rule 56(c), which is as follows:

'Motion for summary judgment and proceedings thereon.--The motion shall be served at least ten (10) days before the time fixed for the hearing.The adverse party prior to the day of hearing may serve opposing affidavits.The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.A summary judgment, interlocutory in character, may be rendered on the issue of liability alone although there is a genuine issue as to the amount of damages.Such judgment, when appropriate, may be rendered for or against any part to the action.'

Idaho Code, § 13-201, enumerates the judgments and orders of the district court from which an appeal may be taken.The only interlocutory judgment from which an appeal is allowed by that section is one entered in an action for the partition of real property.

The judgment here entered has the character of finality, but only as to a portion of the issues raised by the pleadings....

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Viani v. Aetna Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • August 3, 1972
    ...the summary judgment was not a final judgment. I.R.C.P. 54(b); Gerry v. Johnston, 85 Idaho 226, 378 P.2d 198 (1963); Clear v. Marvin, 83 Idaho 399, 363 P.2d 355 (1961); 6 Moore's Fed.Practice §§ I.R.C.P. 54(b) is also in another way controlling, as there was a cross-claim by Allstate agains......
  • Hutchins v. State
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1979
    ...Lloyd v. Lloyd, 95 Idaho 108, 503 P.2d 308 (1972); Viani v. Aetna Insurance Co., 95 Idaho 22, 501 P.2d 706 (1972); Clear v. Marvin, 83 Idaho 399, 363 P.2d 355 (1961). Appeal dismissed. No costs Before a full court. SHEPARD, J., sitting but not participating. 1 For a more complete statement ......
  • Wheatland Irr. Dist. v. McGuire
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • July 16, 1975
    ...C.C.A.3d, 1943, 136 F.2d 654; also citing Maybury v. City of Seattle, 1959, 53 Wash.2d 716, 336 P.2d 878; and Clear v. Marvin, 1961, 83 Idaho 399, 363 P.2d 355, 356) (Emphasis In Clear v. Marvin, 83 Idaho 399, 363 P.2d 355, 356 (1961), an action for wrongful death was involved wherein it wa......
  • Collins v. Parkinson
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • September 5, 1974
    ...Gerry v. Johnston, 85 Idaho 226, 378 P.2d 198 (1963); Viani v. Aetna Ins. Co., 95 Idaho 22, 501 P.2d 706 (1972); Clear v. Marvin, 83 Idaho 399, 363 P.2d 355 (1961).2 It is worthy of note that in Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. McClelland, supra, this court neither discussed nor cited Christen......
  • Get Started for Free