Cline v. Byrne Doors, Inc., 48.
Decision Date | 18 May 1949 |
Docket Number | No. 48.,48. |
Citation | 324 Mich. 540,37 N.W.2d 630 |
Parties | CLINE v. BYRNE DOORS, Inc., et al. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Michigan Workmen's Compensation Commission in the Nature of Certiorari.
Act by Clyde R. Cline, claimant, opposed by Byrne Doors, Inc., employer, and the Michigan Mutual Liability Company. From an order of the Workmen's Compensation Commission granting compensation to claimant, the employer and insurer appeal.
Order affirmed and case remanded for further proceedings.Before the Entire Bench.
Russell J. Comer, Lincoln Park, and Floyd T. Schermerhorn, Detroit, for plaintiff and appellee.
L. J. Carey and Geo. J. Cooper, Detroit, for defendants and appellants.
On leave granted, the defendants appeal from an order of the workmen's compensation commission granting compensation to the plaintiff.
Plaintiff was, at the time of his injury, and still is, a resident of this State. His employment by the defendant Byrne Doors, Inc., first began in 1943, but has not since been continuous. His work, conceded to be skilled employment, was as a foreman or erection superintendent on construction projects, installing equipment for the defendant company. His first job, in 1943, was at the municipal airport in Cleveland, Ohio, in connection with the building of a bomber plant. He worked there for the defendant company about six months. He next worked for the defendant company at the Ford bomber plant in this State, then in Lafayette, Indiana; Buffalo, New York; and Dayton, Ohio. In 1944 he was laid off for four or five months. In 1945 he received a letter from one Mr. Joyce, a superintendent of construction for the defendant Byrne Doors, Inc., who was then in Washington, D. C., offering him a job in Florida. Plaintiff's testimony at the hearing before the deputy is not controverted. He testified:
‘Q. * * * And you received that letter in Lincoln Park. A. Yes, at my home, and he was in Washington at that time and stated that he had that job. It was quite a complicated affair in Florida and-he had been offered it, rather, and he wouldn't take it unless I would assist him on the job, so I wrote him back at Miami, Florida-he gave me his address to write him-and told him that I would accept the job.
‘Q. You told him that you would accept the job. Who did you see in the David Stott building (in Detroit)? * * * A. I went into the office. Mr. Kemph, he is erection superintendent and Mr. Gartrell, assistant--
‘Q. (By Mr. Comer) (attorney for plaintiff): What date was that, witness? A. About March, 1945. I had taken the plans and (he) gave me money to go on and some little hand tools, incidental tools, electrical equipment, in my car to Florida, but I left my home and came to the David Stott building and picked up the money and blueprints, timekeeping paraphernalia, payrolls, weekly payrolls and left for Florida. I didn't go home from the David Stott building. I went straight to Florida. That was the latter part of March of '45.
‘Q. Who did you consult with at the David Stott building? A. Kemph and Johnny Gartrell.
‘Q. Who is he? A. He is assistant erection superintendent of Byrne Doors. That would be in charge of all the work that Byrne Doors had.
‘Q. What were the details of your conversation there with him? A. He just told me to go to Florida and go to work. * * *
‘Q. (By Mr. Comer): Had you received a pay check previous to the time you went to the David Stott building? * * * A. I was paid with a check the morning I left to go to Florida. * * *
‘Q. All right, up to the time you went to the David Stott building, before that date, did you receive any compensation from Byrne Doors? * * * A. No, I worked four days out on Epworth boulevard getting out the tools and equipment to do the job with and shipped them to Florida. I came into the David Stott building and got my check that same day that I left for Florida and $250 incidental expense money to pay my hotels, my meals, and to pay my own self my wages. I carried my own time up until the time that Mr. Joyce came and taken over. I paid myself out of the company money and mailed them a weekly statement and a daily progress report of what I was doing and how I was doing it, but I had the money in my pocket to pay myself. I just mailed them a statement of how much money I had taken out and how much money I still had.
* * *
‘The Commissioner: What agreement did you have--
* * *
‘A. I was just told to go to Florida. I didn't have any agreement. They just gave me the plans and the address and whom it was for and some incidental tools and equipment and $250, and said, ‘Get down to Florida,’ and I got right in my car and drove right to Florida * * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
While he was working on the job in Florida, plaintiff's right leg was crushed and fractured by the fall of some steel. He was voluntarily paid weekly compensation benefits by the insurance carrier for the defendant Byrne Doors, Inc., in accordance with the Florida law, and was also paid additional medical, surgical and hospital care by the said insurance carrier under an order made by the Florida industrial commission, under the Florida statute law.
Subsequently plaintiff filed the petition in the instant matter, with the Michigan department of labor and industry, for compensation for disability arising out of said personal injury in Florida. As hereinbefore stated, the workmen's compensation commission entered an order granting compensation, from which the defendants appeal. Two questions are raised by appellants as grounds for reversal and for setting aside the award.
The statute, 2 Comp.Laws 1929, § 8458, Stat.Ann. § 17.193, under which the compensation commission assumed jurisdiction to make said award, is as follows:
‘The industrial accident board shall have jurisdiction over all controversies arising out of injuries suffered without the territorial limits of this state, in those cases where the injured employe is a resident of this state at the time of the injury, and the contract of hire was made in this state, and any such employe or his dependents shall be entitled to the compensation or death benefits provided by this act.’
Appellants claim that this provision of the act is not applicable because the contract of hire was not made in this State. Under the provisions in the Michigan statute on which plaintiff relies, his right to compensation depends on whether he was employed by virtue of a contract of hire made in this State.
Plaintiff was an...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Boyd v. W.G. Wade Shows
...1943 amendment, this Court addressed the jurisdictional provision of the act but failed to mention Roberts. See Cline v. Byrne Doors, Inc., 324 Mich. 540, 37 N.W.2d 630 (1949); Daniels v. Trailer Transport Co., 327 Mich. 525, 42 N.W.2d 828 (1950). The omission of Roberts from the analyses o......
-
Karaczewski v. Farbman Stein & Co.
...the employee resided in Michigan and contracted for employment here. Id. at 529-530, 42 N.W.2d 828. This Court in Daniels relied on Cline v. Byrne Doors, Inc.,13 for the proposition that, "`[u]nder the provisions in the Michigan statute on which plaintiff relies [i.e., the precursor to § 84......
-
Ramsey v. Kohl
...13 (1976) ("Double recovery is repugnant to the very principle of workmen's compensation."); Cline v. Byrne Doors, Inc., 324 Mich. 540, 557, 37 N.W.2d 630 (1949) (BUTZEL, J., concurring ) ("[I]t is neither within the meaning or the spirit of the act to allow double compensation...."); Oxley......
-
Collins v. American Buslines, 5977
... ... AMERICAN BUSLINES, Inc., Respondent Employer, ... The Industrial Commission of Arizona, ... Industrial Accident Commission, 80 Cal.App.2d 480, 182 P.2d 309; Cline v. Byrne, Doors, Inc., 324 Mich. 540, 37 N.W.2d 630, 8 A.L.R.2d 617; ... ...