Cline v. Reetz-Laiolo

Decision Date28 June 2018
Docket Number3:17-cv-06867-WHO,Related Case Nos. 3:17-cv-06866-WHO
Citation329 F.Supp.3d 1000
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Parties Emma CLINE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Chaz REETZ-LAIOLO, Defendant. Chaz Reetz-Laiolo, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Emma Cline, et al., Defendants.

Abigail Bain Everdell, Michael Vatis, Elizabeth A. McNamara, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, NY, Joy Gowoon Kim, Thomas R. Burke, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Edward John Normand, Jackie Larosa Jakab, Kyle William Roche, Nathan Andrew Holcomb, Amos Emory Friedland, Boies, Schiller, Flexner LLP, Armonk, NY, Katherine Ann Eskovitz, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Oakland, CA, Benjamin Hans Diessel, Kevin Michael Smith, Leslie Anne Cahill, Wiggin and Dana LLP, New Haven, CT, Sapna Walter Palla, Wiggin and Dana LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 34 (Case No. 17-cv-6866); Dkt. No. 46 (Case No. 17-cv-6867)

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge

INTRODUCTION

This litigation is grist for its own novel. From 2009 through 2012, Emma Cline, author of the 2016 best-selling novel The Girls , was romantically involved with writer Chaz Reetz-Laiolo, who is 13 years her senior. She accuses him of domestic abuse and other terrible conduct during and after their relationship. And he accuses her of awful conduct, including stealing his work for her book and intruding into his email and bank accounts, and the email accounts of Kari Bernard, their mutual friend and former roommate, and Kristin Kiesel, a romantic partner of Reetz-Laiolo.

After a year of trying to settle their dispute out of court, the parties filed separate lawsuits, which were subsequently related. Cline, The Clegg Agency (her literary agent), and Penguin Random House LLC (publisher of The Girls ) bring claims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and preemption of Reetz-Laiolo's conversion and civil theft claims. Cline also brings a claim for declaratory judgment on certain statutes of limitations. And she asserts claims for conversion, domestic violence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage. He brings claims for copyright infringement, conversion, trespass to chattels, civil theft, and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress. Bernard and Kiesel join him in asserting claims under the Federal Stored Communications Act, Federal Wiretap Act, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, California Invasion of Privacy Act, California Computer Crime Law, the California Constitution, and for intrusion upon seclusion. This order addresses the parties' motions to dismiss.

BACKGROUND
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. The Relationship and The Dispute1

In June 2009, Cline was a 20-year-old college student when she met 33-year-old Reetz-Laiolo, a writer and lecturer at the Academy of Art University in San Francisco. Cline Compl. ¶¶ 55, 57 (Dkt. No. 1); Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶¶ 32–35, 38 (Dkt. No. 38). Prior to that, Cline had published short stories in various publications, including Tin House , Post Road Magazine, and The Paris Review. Cline Compl. ¶ 57; Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶ 37. Reetz-Laiolo had also published works in publications, including The Paris Review. Cline Compl. ¶ 28; Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶ 30. The two soon became romantically involved; she thereafter withdrew from college and moved in with Reetz-Laiolo in December 2009. Cline Compl. ¶ 55; Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶¶ 2, 38–39. Cline lived with Reetz-Laiolo in Berkeley until the fall of 2011, when she moved to New York to begin a Masters in Fine Arts program at Columbia University. Cline Compl. ¶¶ 55, 72; Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶¶ 39, 41 The relationship continued off and on until February 2012, after which the two remained in contact. Cline Compl. ¶¶ 55, 77; Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶¶ 42–43.2 They shared drafts of their writing both during and after the relationship ended. Cline Compl. ¶ 20, 28.

By September 2014, Cline had completed a draft of The Girls. Cline Compl. ¶ 20; Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶¶ 159–60. She had repeatedly asked Reetz-Laiolo to read her drafts, "both because she wanted his input and so he would be aware that certain facts from his life and their shared life had been included." Cline Compl. ¶ 20; see Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶ 163 (explaining that he initially declined to read the draft novel because "[h]e wished to avoid further emotional entanglement with her").

On October 3, 2014, Penguin Random House LLC ("Random House") bought the rights to publish The Girls for $2 million. Cline Compl. ¶ 22; Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶ 161. Cline called Reetz-Laiolo shortly after to tell him her novel had sold. Cline Compl. ¶ 22. According to Reetz-Laiolo, Cline sent him a G-chat message on November 28, 2014, stating "i will be exposed as a plagiarizer ... paid 40 bucks to run novel through online plagiarism detector." Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶ 162.

On February 24, 2015, he finally agreed to read the manuscript, but days later changed his mind and asked Cline to "send him any passages she thought might concern him[.]" Cline Compl. ¶ 29. But see Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. (indicating that Cline refused to send the manuscript and instead sent a document with excerpts). On March 3, 2015, she sent him "eight brief phrases and snippets from her draft novel, then 355-pages, that she thought he should know about." Cline Compl. ¶ 30; Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶ 165; see also Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶¶ 165–167.

On October 12, 2015, Reetz-Laiolo requested a draft of The Girls manuscript that was sold to Random House.3 Cline Compl. ¶ 31; Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶¶ 168–170. Cline informed him that the earlier version had been edited and revised over the intervening months, but he demanded to see the version sold to Random House. Cline Compl. ¶ 32. On October 14, 2015, she sent him this version. Cline Compl. ¶ 32; see Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶ 171 (noting that she sent a version of the manuscript "that she created that very same day[,]" and recognizing that certain sentences included in the previous chart had been removed from this version of the draft). On November 3, 2015, Reetz-Laiolo wrote to Cline, "I would not publish this novel if I were you. It is vile how much of my work you have plagiarized in it." Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶ 172.

On January 15, 2016, Reetz-Laiolo sent Cline a demand letter, itemizing 36 instances of "infringement." Cline Compl. ¶ 35; Reetz-Laiolo ¶¶ 9, 177.4 Cline agreed to remove the identified snippets.5 Cline Compl. ¶ 38. Reetz-Laiolo later identified a draft screenplay entitled All Sea as the source of the material he claims was copied. Cline Compl. ¶ 41. Reetz-Laiolo had emailed her a copy of this draft screenplay under the file name "Fadein.doc" on September 4, 2011. Cline Compl. ¶ 41.

On June 14, 2016, The Girls was published in hardcover to widespread acclaim. Cline Compl. ¶ 43. It debuted at number three on The New York Times Hardcover Fiction Bestseller list, and remained on the list for 12 weeks. Id.

On February 21, 2017, Reetz-Laiolo's new (current) counsel sent Cline and Random House a demand letter setting forth two theories of copyright infringement. Cline Compl. ¶¶ 45–47. On February 22, 2017, the parties entered into a tolling agreement. See Reetz-Laiolo MTD at 5 (Dkt. No. 34). On March 30, 2017, Reetz-Laiolo's counsel followed up with a draft complaint (the "First Draft Complaint").6 Cline Compl. ¶¶ 89–90.

On May 26, 2017, Reetz-Laiolo's counsel provided Cline with five separate drafts of All Sea , but later claimed that portions of the challenged passages originated from only one of the five drafts, dated June 17, 2013. Cline Compl. ¶ 50; see 6/17/13 All Sea Draft (Cline Compl., Ex. A). According to Cline, Reetz-Laiolo's counsel indicated that the remainder originated from two later drafts, dated December 26, 2013 and June 24, 2014, respectively. Cline Compl. ¶ 50; see 12/26/13 All Sea Draft (Cline Compl. Ex. B); 6/24/14 All Sea Draft (Cline Compl., Ex. C). These versions were provided to Cline and Random House for the first time on July 28, 2017. Cline Compl. ¶ 50.

B. The Works
1. Cline's The Girls

In 2008, Cline composed three short stories that "contained the conceptual seeds ... that would develop over the years into The Girls. " Cline Compl. ¶¶ 17, 18. Those seeds were "the close, formative relationship between adolescent girls, the setting of a Sonoma County commune in the 1960s, and the dark underbelly of violence reflected in the Manson Family story[.]" Id. ¶ 17. She also incorporated factual details from her life, including information she learned while dating Reetz-Laiolo. Id. ¶ 19. She completed a draft manuscript of The Girls in September 2014. Id. ¶ 20. That same month, Cline's literary agency (The Clegg Agency) sent the manuscript to publishers, and included the following description of the novel:

... Emma Cline returns us to the combustable [sic] summer of 1969 and drops us onto the sun-scorched sidewalks of Marin County behind the bored and troubled eyes of 14-year-old Evie. Stranded in the lonely gulf between recently divorced parents and filled with a desperate restlessness, Evie leans with obsessive abandon into an accidental friendship with an older and beguiling drifter named Suzanne. Wide-eyed and smitten, Evie is easily towed into the turbulent waters of a soon-to-be-infamous commune, quickly finding herself under the sway of a madman and closer than she knows to unthinkable violence. Emma Cline's story of how a rudderless girl finds herself at the flashpoint of a stumbling counter-culture at decade's end delivers a hauntingly precise investigation into how power is lost when we look to find it in others, how frighteningly mutable the unformed, inchoate self can be, and just how far that self will go to be seen and named.

Id. ¶ 21; see also Reetz-Laiolo Am. Compl. ¶ 160.

2. Reetz-Laiolo's Works

Reetz-Laiolo alleges...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Seale v. Peacock
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • April 27, 2022
    ...and requesting supplemental briefing about whether the elements identified are complete and accurate).9 See Cline v. Reetz-Laiolo , 329 F. Supp. 3d 1000, 1045–46 (N.D. Cal. 2018) ; Aguiar v. MySpace LLC , CV 14-05520 SJO (PJWx), 2017 WL 1856229, at *9–10 (C.D. Cal. May 5, 2017) ; Chavan v. ......
  • Saleh v. Nike, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • September 27, 2021
    ...Act of 1986]" (the "Wiretap Act"). Brodsky v. Apple Inc. , 445 F. Supp. 3d 110, 127 (N.D. Cal. 2020) (quoting Cline v. Reetz-Laiolo , 329 F. Supp. 3d 1000, 1051 (N.D. Cal. 2018) ). Under the Wiretap Act, "contents" is defined as "any information concerning the substance, purport, or meaning......
  • Brodsky v. Apple Inc., Case No. 19-CV-00712-LHK
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • April 7, 2020
    ...any communication). "The analysis for a violation of CIPA is the same as that under the federal Wiretap Act." Cline v. Reetz-Laiolo , 329 F. Supp. 3d 1000, 1051 (N.D. Cal. 2018) (citation omitted). Under the Wiretap Act, the term "contents" is defined as "any information concerning the subs......
  • Ramachandran v. City of L. Altos
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • February 13, 2019
    ...(3) plaintiff's emotional distress is actually and proximately the result of defendant's outrageous conduct." Cline v. Reetz-Laiolo , 329 F.Supp.3d 1000, 1053 (N.D. Cal. 2018) (quoting Conley v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco , 85 Cal. App. 4th 1126, 1133, 102 Cal.Rptr.2d 679 (2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • § 7.05 The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.§ 1030)
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Intellectual Property and Computer Crimes Title Chapter 7 The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
    • Invalid date
    ...the damages caused to plaintiff's system or to resecure [sic] the system in the wake of a spamming attack."); Cline v. Reetz-Laiolo, 329 F. Supp. 3d 1000, 1049 (N.D. Cal. 2018) ("The cost of investigating unauthorized access and securing a computer network constitutes a "loss" under the sta......
  • § 7.07 Specific Criminal Offenses and Civil Violations Under the CFAA
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Intellectual Property and Computer Crimes Title Chapter 7 The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
    • Invalid date
    ...Circuit: Estes Forwarding Worldwide LLC, v. Cuellar, 239 F. Supp. 3d 918, 922 (E.D. Va. 2017). Ninth Circuit: Cline v. Reetz-Laiolo, 329 F. Supp. 3d 1000, 1049 (N.D. Cal. 2018) (citation omitted).[470] The term "obtaining information" includes merely viewing information online without downl......
  • § 8.03 Stored Communications Act (SCA)
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Intellectual Property and Computer Crimes Title Chapter 8 The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)
    • Invalid date
    ...In re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation, 263 F. Supp. 3d 838, 845 (N.D. Cal. 2017).[299] Id.[300] Cline v. Reetz-Laiolo, 329 F. Supp. 3d 1000, 1043 (N.D. Cal. 2018); but see Band Pro Film & Digital, Inc. v. ARRI Inc., No. CV 12-03226-CJC(ANX), 2012 WL 12888099, at *4 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 10,......
  • § 8.04 Civil Violations (Section 2707)
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Intellectual Property and Computer Crimes Title Chapter 8 The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)
    • Invalid date
    ...recoverable under the SCA "in the absence of an award for actual damages or profits realized by the offender"); Cline v. Reetz-Laiolo, 329 F. Supp. 3d 1000, 1043 (N.D. Cal. 2018); but see Maremont v. Susan Fredman Design Group, Ltd., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26557, at *23 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 3, 20......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT