Clinton v. Virginia, 294
| Decision Date | 04 May 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. 294,294 |
| Citation | 377 U.S. 158,84 S.Ct. 1186,12 L.Ed.2d 213 |
| Parties | Catherine CLINTON v. VIRGINIA |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Calvin H. Childress, Norfolk, Va., for petitioner.
D. Gardiner Tyler, Richmond, Va., for respondent.
On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.
The motion to strike the supplemental brief on behalf of the respondent is denied. The judgment is reversed. Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505; Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23.
Since the Court finds that the 'spiked' mike used by the police officers penetrated petitioner's premises sufficiently to be an actual trespass thereof, I join in the judgment.
To continue reading
Request your trial
32 cases
-
State v. Cartwright
...679, 5 L.Ed.2d 734 (1961); Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963); Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 84 S.Ct. 1186, 12 L.Ed.2d 213 (1964); as has the distinction based on whether the speaker intended his conversation to be confined within the four walls......
-
State v. Tanner
...such as that between Goldman v. United States, 316 U.S. 129, 62 S.Ct. 993, 86 L.Ed. 1322 (1942), and Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 84 S.Ct. 1186, 12 L.Ed.2d 213 (1964): In Goldman, the Court held that use of an electronic amplifying device placed against a party wall to eavesdrop on co......
-
United States v. Bain
...that any physical invasion of the structure of the home, ‘by even a fraction of an inch,’ was too much.”); Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 84 S.Ct. 1186, 12 L.Ed.2d 213 (1964) (reversing state court's holding that insertion of electronic device into the wall dividing two apartments did n......
-
United States v. Perez
...171 (1963); Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483, 486-490, fns. 4, 5, 84 S.Ct. 889, 11 L.Ed.2d 856 (1964); Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 84 S.Ct. 1186, 12 L.Ed.2d 213 (1964); Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 213, 87 S.Ct. 424, 17 L.Ed.2d 312 (Justice Brennan, concurring) (1966); Hof......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 books & journal articles
-
Survey of Washington Search and Seizure Law
...device to determine whether a particular article or person is in an individual's home at a particular time); Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 12 L. Ed. 2d 213, 84 S. Ct. 1186, (1964) (fourth amendment implicated when microphone simply "stuck in" partition wall of apartment adjoining defen......
-
Survey of Washington Search and Seizure Law: 1988 Update
...device to determine whether a particular article or person is in an individual's home at a particular time); Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 12 L. Ed. 2d 213, 84 S. Ct. 1186 (1964) (fourth amendment implicated when microphone simply "stuck in" partition wall of apartment adjoining defend......
-
Survey of Washington Search and Seizure Law: 1998 Update
...device to determine whether a particular article or person is in an individual's home at a particular time); Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 158, 84 S. Ct. 1186, 1186, 12 L. Ed. 2d 213, 213 (1964) (Clark, J., concurring) (the Fourth Amendment is implicated when a microphone used by polic......
-
Survey of Washington Search and Seizure Law: 2005 Update
...time. United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705, 714-15, 104 S. Ct. 3296, 3302-03, 82 L. Ed. 2d 530, 541 (1984); see also Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 158, 84 S. Ct. 1186, 1186, 12 L. Ed. 2d 213, 213 (1964) (Clark, J., concurring) (the Fourth Amendment is implicated when a microphone used b......
Request a trial to view additional results