Clinton v. Virginia, 294
Decision Date | 04 May 1964 |
Docket Number | No. 294,294 |
Parties | Catherine CLINTON v. VIRGINIA |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Calvin H. Childress, Norfolk, Va., for petitioner.
D. Gardiner Tyler, Richmond, Va., for respondent.
On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.
The motion to strike the supplemental brief on behalf of the respondent is denied. The judgment is reversed. Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505; Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23.
Since the Court finds that the 'spiked' mike used by the police officers penetrated petitioner's premises sufficiently to be an actual trespass thereof, I join in the judgment.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Cartwright
...679, 5 L.Ed.2d 734 (1961); Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963); Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 84 S.Ct. 1186, 12 L.Ed.2d 213 (1964); as has the distinction based on whether the speaker intended his conversation to be confined within the four walls......
-
State v. Tanner
...such as that between Goldman v. United States, 316 U.S. 129, 62 S.Ct. 993, 86 L.Ed. 1322 (1942), and Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 84 S.Ct. 1186, 12 L.Ed.2d 213 (1964): In Goldman, the Court held that use of an electronic amplifying device placed against a party wall to eavesdrop on co......
-
United States v. Bain
...that any physical invasion of the structure of the home, ‘by even a fraction of an inch,’ was too much.”); Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 84 S.Ct. 1186, 12 L.Ed.2d 213 (1964) (reversing state court's holding that insertion of electronic device into the wall dividing two apartments did n......
-
United States v. Perez
...171 (1963); Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483, 486-490, fns. 4, 5, 84 S.Ct. 889, 11 L.Ed.2d 856 (1964); Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158, 84 S.Ct. 1186, 12 L.Ed.2d 213 (1964); Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 213, 87 S.Ct. 424, 17 L.Ed.2d 312 (Justice Brennan, concurring) (1966); Hof......
-
Countermajoritarian hero or zero? Rethinking the Warren Court's role in the criminal procedure revolution.
...at A1 (noting the ironic results in the Court's prior eavesdropping cases due to technological advances). (366) See Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158 (1964) (Clark, J, concurring) (joining the decision because the "'spiked' mike used by the police officers penetrated petitioner's premises s......
-
TABLE OF CASES
...200, 204 Clarke, Commonwealth v., 960 N.E.2d 306 (Mass. 2011), 460 Clayton, State v., 45 P.3d 30 (Mont. 2002), 118 Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158 (1964), 62 Coker, United States v., 433 F.3d 39 (1st Cir. 2005), 489 Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970), 53 Colorado v. Bannister, 449 U.S.......
-
Table of Cases
...217, 221 Clarke, Commonwealth v., 960 N.E.2d 306 (Mass. 2011), 502 Clayton, State v., 45 P.3d 30 (Mont. 2002), 127 Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158 (1964), 66 Coker, United States v., 433 F.3d 39 (1st Cir. 2005), 532 Collins v. Virginia, 238 Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970), 578 Color......
-
§ 5.03 "Houses"
...are less than in homes.17 --------Notes:[9] See, e.g., Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483 (1964).[10] See, e.g., Clinton v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 158 (1964) (per curiam).[11] See, e.g., Taylor v. United States, 286 U.S. 1 (1932).[12] Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. at 180 (quoting Boyd v. Un......