Clowers v. Snowden, Case Number: 2064 OK Ter

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
Writing for the CourtTURNER, J.
Citation1908 OK 126,21 Okla. 476,96 P. 596
PartiesCLOWERS et al. v. SNOWDEN et al.
Docket NumberCase Number: 2064 OK Ter
Decision Date24 June 1908

1908 OK 126
96 P. 596
21 Okla. 476

CLOWERS et al.
v.
SNOWDEN et al.

Case Number: 2064 OK Ter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided: June 24, 1908


Syllabus

¶0 1. BILLS AND NOTES--Nonnegotiable Note--Attorney's Fee. A promissory note, providing: "If collected by an attorney, a fee of $ 10 to be charged"--is nonnegotiable.

2. MORTGAGES--Foreclosure--Defenses--Want of Consideration-- Nonnegotiable Note. In a suit to foreclose a mortgage securing a debt, evidenced by a nonnegotiable promissory note, it was error for the court to exclude evidence tending to show want of consideration, notwithstanding plaintiff be an innocent purchaser for value and before maturity.

Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; C. F. Irwin, Judge.

Action by Ella F. Snowden and James L. Admire against Mathew Clowers and Charity Clowers. Judgment for plaintiffs; and defendants bring error. Reversed and remanded.

On July 11, 1903, Ella F. Snowden, defendant in error, plaintiff below, brought suit in the district court of Kingfisher county, Oklahoma Territory, against Mathew Clowers and Charity Clowers, plaintiffs in error, defendants below, and set forth in her petition, in substance, that, on December 20, 1902, defendants, Mathew Clowers and Charity Clowers, made, executed, and delivered to James L. Admire their one certain promissory note for $ 387.25, payable 6 months after date, with interest thereon at 12 per cent. per annum from date; that afterwards said Admire sold and conveyed the same to plaintiff for value, and before maturity, without recourse; that she was, at that time, the owner and holder of the same. That there was due and owing plaintiff thereon the sum of $ 387.25, with interest, and $ 10 for an attorney's fee, as provided for in the face of the note. That to secure the payment of said note, on the same day, defendants made, executed, and delivered to said Admire a mortgage on certain lands, describing them, in Kingfisher county, Okla. T., which was duly filed for record, and which, before the maturity of said note, was duly assigned to her by said Admire for value; that she was, at that time, the owner and holder thereof, and prays that the same be foreclosed. Copies of the note and mortgage are filed with the complaint, and marked "Exhibits A and B."

On August 5, 1903, defendants, Mathew Clowers and Charity Clowers, for answer, in substance, pleaded: (1) Non est factum; (2) want of consideration; (3) that plaintiff is not the real owner of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 practice notes
  • Bell v. Riggs, Case Number: 1704
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • June 25, 1912
    ...made, it is sufficient to refer to Clevenger v. Lewis, 20 Okla. 837, 95 P. 230, 16 L.R.A. (N.S.) 410, 16 Ann. Cas. 56; Clowers v. Snowden, 21 Okla. 476, 96 P. 596; Cotton v. John Deere Plow Co., 14 Okla. 605, 78 P. 321. From a study of these and other cases which they refer to it will be se......
  • Seibold v. Ruble, Case Number: 3037
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • December 23, 1913
    ...588, 82 P. 649; Clevenger v. Lewis, 20 Okla. 837, 95 P. 230, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 410, 16 Ann. Cas. 56; Clowers et al. v. Snowden et al., 21 Okla. 476, 96 P. 596; Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. McCoy & Spivey Bros., 32 Okla. 277, 122 P. 125, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 177; Bell v. Riggs, 34 Okla. 834......
  • Pattee Plow Co. v. Beard, Case Number: 575
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • September 13, 1910
    ...for collection, if not paid when due. The provision for attorney's fees renders them non-negotiable. Clowers et al. v. Snowden et al., 21 Okla. 476, 96 P. 596; Cotton v. John Deere Plow Co., 14 Okla. 605, 78 P. 321. Since the notes were payable to order, in order for the payee to transfer h......
  • Mitchell v. Altus State Bank, Case Number: 1611
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • March 12, 1912
    ...605, 78 P. 321; Clevenger v. Lewis, 20 Okla. 837, 95 P. 230, 16 L.R.A. (N. S.) 410, 16 Ann. Cas. 56; Clowers et al. v. Snowden et al., 21 Okla. 476, 96 P. 596. ¶2 Defendant, Mitchell, in his answer admitted the execution of the note sued on, but charged that the same was not intended to be ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
  • Bell v. Riggs, Case Number: 1704
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • June 25, 1912
    ...made, it is sufficient to refer to Clevenger v. Lewis, 20 Okla. 837, 95 P. 230, 16 L.R.A. (N.S.) 410, 16 Ann. Cas. 56; Clowers v. Snowden, 21 Okla. 476, 96 P. 596; Cotton v. John Deere Plow Co., 14 Okla. 605, 78 P. 321. From a study of these and other cases which they refer to it will be se......
  • Seibold v. Ruble, Case Number: 3037
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • December 23, 1913
    ...588, 82 P. 649; Clevenger v. Lewis, 20 Okla. 837, 95 P. 230, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 410, 16 Ann. Cas. 56; Clowers et al. v. Snowden et al., 21 Okla. 476, 96 P. 596; Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. McCoy & Spivey Bros., 32 Okla. 277, 122 P. 125, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 177; Bell v. Riggs, 34 Okla. 834......
  • Pattee Plow Co. v. Beard, Case Number: 575
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • September 13, 1910
    ...for collection, if not paid when due. The provision for attorney's fees renders them non-negotiable. Clowers et al. v. Snowden et al., 21 Okla. 476, 96 P. 596; Cotton v. John Deere Plow Co., 14 Okla. 605, 78 P. 321. Since the notes were payable to order, in order for the payee to transfer h......
  • Mitchell v. Altus State Bank, Case Number: 1611
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • March 12, 1912
    ...605, 78 P. 321; Clevenger v. Lewis, 20 Okla. 837, 95 P. 230, 16 L.R.A. (N. S.) 410, 16 Ann. Cas. 56; Clowers et al. v. Snowden et al., 21 Okla. 476, 96 P. 596. ¶2 Defendant, Mitchell, in his answer admitted the execution of the note sued on, but charged that the same was not intended to be ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT