Clyde v. Lake
Decision Date | 02 January 1917 |
Citation | 78 N.H. 322,100 A. 552 |
Parties | CLYDE v. LAKE et al. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Transferred from Superior Court, Hillsborough County; Branch, Judge.
Bill in equity by George W. Clyde, trustee, against Harry F. Lake, administrator, and another, to determine the right to a fund in the hands of plaintiff. Case transferred by the superior court without ruling. Plaintiff advised to pay the fund to defendant J. Joseph Doherty, as administrator of the estate of Andrew N. Freeman. Case discharged.
Bill in equity by the plaintiff, as a trustee under the will of Annie M. Freeman, against Lake, as the administrator de bonis non of Mrs. Freeman's estate, and against Doherty, as the administrator of Andrew N. Freeman's estate, Andrew being the son of Mrs. Freeman. The question presented arises under the fourth clause of the will, which is as follows:
Mrs. Freeman died April 21, 1904, and Andrew October 31, 1915. The administrator of her estate upon the settlement of his account turned over to the trustee the balance in his hands, which the trustee used for the support of Andrew until his death. Upon the settlement of the trust it appeared that the unexpended balance amounted to $3,441.65. This sum is now claimed by each of the defendants.
George W. Clyde, of Nashua, pro se. Foster & Lake, of Concord, for defendant Lake. John J. Doherty, of Concord, pro se.
By the residuary clause of the will it is apparent the testatrix intended to provide for the reasonable support of her son. This was her controlling purpose in creating a trust fund and authorizing the trustee to use the same for the comfortable support of her son. She omitted to use language indicative of a purpose to specifically limit his interest in the trust to such part as the trustee might in his discretion appropriate to his support and to dispose of the unexpended balance remaining upon the son's death to other beneficiaries. It is not probable that she...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Amoskeag Trust Co. v. Trustees of Dartmouth College
...which was drawn from the testator's silence in the Williams Case is opposed to the presumption against partial intestacy, (Clyde v. Lake, 78 N.H. 322, 100 A. 552; Kennard v. Kennard, 63 N.H. 303), and in the second place it fails to take into account the statement in Kingsbury v. Bazeley, 7......
-
Heald v. Kilgore
...to say whether or not there was partial intestacy, because, if the will were construed to dispose of all the estate (Clyde v. Lake, 78 N. H. 322, 100 A. 552), the husband under such construction would receive only what is expressly given It is our conclusion that the will affords no evidenc......
-
Leonard v. Stanton.
...contend that this was a questionable statement of the law and argue that if the testator had been informed that the rule of Clyde v. Lake, 78 N.H. 322, 100 A. 552, when applied to the will, might operate to deprive the appellant of the right to the residue left in the trustee's hands, he wo......
-
Swan v. Bailey
...whatever sum remained in the hands of the trustee after the death of the testator's son would go to the son's heirs. Clyde v. Lake, 78 N. H. 322, 100 A. 552; Rollins v. Merrill, 70 N. H. 436, 48 A. 1088; Sawyer v. Banfield, 55 N. H. "A contestant of a will must have some direct legal or equ......