Co of Otoe v. Baldwin Baldwin v. Co of Otoe
Decision Date | 17 March 1884 |
Parties | CO. OF OTOE v. BALDWIN. BALDWIN v. CO. OF OTOE |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
John C. Watson, for County of Otoe.
J. M. Woolworth, for Baldwin.
>>On the first of April, 1882, John T. Baldwin brought a suit at law, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Nebraska, against the county of Otoe, in the state of Nebraska, to recover the amount due on sundry coupons cut from bonds issued by that county, the coupons being payable, some January 1st and others July 1st in each year, from and including 1870 to and including 1881, and January 1, 1882. On the eleventh of August, 1882, Baldwin brought another suit at law, in the same court against the same defendant, to recover the amount due on sundry other coupons, cut from some of the same bonds, the coupons being payable, some January 1st and others July 1st in each year, from and including 1878 to and including 1882. The bonds were issued by the county, while Nebraska was a territory, to the Council Bluffs & St. Joseph Railroad Company, the principal being payable January 1, 1887, with interest from January 1, 1867, at the rate of 10 per cent. per annum, payable on July 1st and January 1st in each year. The amount of the principal of the bonds was $40,000, they bore date November 12, 1866, and were signed by the chairman of the board of county commissioners, and the treasurer, and attested by the county clerk, and bore the seal of the county, and were payable to the company or its assigns, and each bond was assigned by it, by an assignment under its seal, to the bearer, indorsed on the bond, and dated November 18, 1869. Each bond contained the following statement:
Nebraska City is in the county of Otoe, on the west bank of the Missouri river. Fremont county, in Iowa, adjoins Otoe county on the east, being separated from it only by the Missouri river. Council Bluffs is in Iowa, on the east bank of the Missouri river, above Fremont county, and 40 to 50 miles above Nebraska City. St. Joseph is in Missouri, on the east bank of the Missouri river, below the other places named.
On the sixth of January, 1860, the legislative assembly of the territory of Nebraska passed an act (Laws 1859-60, 6th Sess. p. 112) entitled 'An act to authorize Otoe county to subscribe and take stock in any railroad located or to be located in Fremont county, in the state of Iowa.' This act contained the following provisions:
On the eleventh of January, 1861, the legislative assembly of the territory passed an act (Laws 1860-61, 7th Sess. p. 146) entitled 'An act to define the powers and duties of county commissioners and county clerk.' This act created in each county a board of county commissioners, consisting of three persons. It also provided as follows:
The records of the commissioners of Otoe county, and the records of that county, show the following facts: The county clerk called a meeting of the commissioners of Otoe county, to be held February 24, 1866, 'to take into consideration the question of submitting to the people of said county the issuance of the bonds of said county, not exceeding $200,000 in amount, to be used in securing to said county an eastern railroad connection.' The meeting was held on that day, two commissioners being present, and it was ordered that an election be held on the seventeenth of March, 1866, in and throughout the county of Otoe, 'for the purpose of ascertaining whether the commissioners of Otoe county shall issue bonds, not to exceed $200,000, for the purpose of securing an eastern railroad connection for Nebraska City, N. T.' The election was held on the day named, and the vote was 1,362 for, and 201 against, 'the issuing of two hundred thousand dollars for the purpose of securing an eastern railroad connection for Nebraska City.' On the ninth of November, 1866, the commissioners, three being present, made the following order: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
I IS Ljo State v. County Court Op Wirt County.
...28 S. C. 427; 72 Ga. 246; Id. 145; 117 U. S. 508; 21 111. 511; 5 W. Va. 382; 11 W. Va. 1; 106 U. S. 487; 2 Mete. (Ky.) 219; 16 Wall. 667; 3 Wall. 327; Jri., 654; 94 U. S. 310; 96 U. S. 205; 110 U. S. 156; 111 U. S. 363; 93 U. S. 502; 105 U. S. 370; 92 U. S. 484; 111 U. S. 1; 1 Wall. 175; 99......
-
Katz v. Herrick
... ... 72 P. 659; Burton v. Snyder, 22 Colo. 173, 43 P ... 1004; Otoe Co. v. Baldwin, 111 U.S. 1, 28 L.Ed. 331, ... 4 S.Ct. 265; Carter v ... ...
-
In re Fourth Judicial District
...104; San Antonio v. Mehaffy, 96 U.S. 312; Montclair v. Ramsdell, 107 U.S. 147; City of Jonesboro v. Cairo, etc., 110 U.S. 192; Ottoe v. Baldwin, 111 U.S. 1; v. Quackenbush, 117 U.S. 508; Haggard v. Hawkins, 14 Ind. 299; Grandin v. State, 16 Ind. 197; Hingle v. State, 24 Ind. 28; Bright v. M......
-
State of Illinois v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
... ... Railroad Co., 110 ... U.S. 192, 199, 200, 4 S.Ct. 67; Otoe Co. v. Baldwin, ... 111 U.S. 1, 4 S.Ct. 265; School-Dist. v. Hall, 113 ... ...