Coal. for Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency

Citation684 F.3d 102,74 ERC 2161
Decision Date26 June 2012
Docket Number10–1208,10–1158,10–1169,10–1201,10–1203,10–1206,10–1042,10–1211,10–1219,10–1099,10–1166,10–1318,10–1040,10–1120,10–1281,10–1124,10–1044,10–1129,10–1245,10–1024,10–1083,10–1170,10–1134,10–1178,10–1119,10–1073,10–1182,10–1092,10–1234,10–1156,10–1175,10–1114,10–1109,10–1174,10–1041,10–1125,10–1147,10–1035,10–1207,10–1221,10–1161,10–1239,10–1320,10–1218,10–1152,10–1122,10–1037,10–1038,10–1176,10–1030,10–1132,10–1039,10–1210,10–1220,10–1025,10–1148,10–1126,10–1128,10–1094,10–1319,10–1310,10–1164,10–1212,10–1180.,10–1163,10–1202,10–1222,10–1160,10–1179,10–1173,10–1046,10–1036,Nos. 09–1322,10–1143,10–1110,10–1167,10–1321,10–1118,10–1159,10–1200,10–1026,10–1123,10–1162,10–1131,10–1177,10–1145,10–1216,10–1235,10–1144,10–1168,10–1199,10–1213,10–1045,10–1127,s. 09–1322
PartiesCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE REGULATION, INC., et al., Petitioners v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent State of Michigan, et al., Intervenors. Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent American Frozen Food Institute, et al., Intervenors. Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent Langboard, Inc.—MDF, et al., Intervenors. American Chemistry Council, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa Perez Jackson, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al., Intervenors.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

On Petitions for Review of Final Actions of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Patrick R. Day, Harry W. MacDougald, and Jeffrey Bossert Clark argued the causes for Non–State Petitioners and Supporting Intervenors. With them on the briefs were John J. Burns, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of the State of Alaska, Steven E. Mulder, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Peter Glaser, Mark E. Nagle, Matthew Dukes, Paul D. Phillips, John A. Bryson, Ellen Steen, Eric Groten, John P. Elwood, James A. Holtkamp, Chet M. Thompson, Robin S. Conrad, Rachel L. Brand, Sheldon Gilbert, Quentin Riegel, Jeffrey A. Rosen, Robert R. Gasaway, William H. Burgess, Sam Kazman, Hans Bader, Matthew G. Paulson, Harry Moy Ng, Michele Marie Schoeppe, Michael R. Barr, Alexandra M. Walsh, Adam J. White, Jeffrey A. Lamken, Timothy K. Webster, Roger R. Martella, Neal J. Cabral, Theodore Hadzi–Antich, Ashley C. Parrish, Cynthia A.M. Stroman, Scott C. Oostdyk, Gordon R. Alphonso, Shannon L. Goessling, Edward A. Kazmarek, F. William Brownell, Norman W. Fichthorn, Henry V. Nickel, and Allison D. Wood. Paul D. Clement, Mark W. DeLaquil, Andrew M. Grossman, and David B. Rivin, Jr. entered appearances.

E. Duncan Getchell, Jr., Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, argued the cause for State Petitioners Texas and Virginia on Denial of Reconsideration of the Endangerment Finding and State Petitioners and Supporting Intervenors on Endangerment Finding Delegation Issues. With him on the briefs were Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General, Stephen R. McCullough, Senior Appellate Counsel, Charles E. James Jr., Chief Deputy Attorney General, and Wesley G. Russell, Jr., Deputy Attorney General.

Greg Abbott, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Bill Cobb, Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation, J. Reed Clay, Jr., Special Assistant and Senior Counsel to the Attorney General, Jonathan F. Mitchell, Solicitor General, Michael P. Murphy, Assistant Solicitor General, Luther Strange III, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Alabama, Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Florida, Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Indiana, Jack Conway, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, James D. “Buddy” Caldwell, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Louisiana, Bill Schuette, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, John J. Bursch, Solicitor General, Neil D. Gordon, Assistant Attorney General, Gary C. Rikard, Jon Bruning, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Nebraska, Katherine J. Spohn, Special Counsel to the Attorney General, Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of North Dakota, Margaret Olson, Assistant Attorney General, Scott Pruitt, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma, Alan Wilson, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, Marty Jackley, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the States of South Dakota, Roxanne Giedd, Chief, Civil Litigation Division, Mark L. Shurtleff, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Utah, and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia were on the briefs for State Petitioners and Supporting Intervenors. Robert D. Tambling, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Alabama, entered an appearance.

Christian J. Ward, Scott A. Keller, and April L. Farris were on the brief for amici curiae Scientists in support of Petitioners.

Derek Schmidt, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Kansas, and John Campbell, Chief Deputy Attorney General, were on the brief for amicus curiae State of Kansas in support of Petitioners.

Martin R. Levin, Michael J. O'Neill, Donald M. Falk, Mark S. Kaufman, Steven J. Lechner, and Richard P. Hutchison were on the brief for amici curiae Landmark Legal Foundation, et al. in support of Petitioners.

Jon M. Lipshultz and Angeline Purdy, Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the causes for respondent. With them on the brief were John Hannon, Carol Holmes, and Steven Silverman, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Attorneys. Thomas A. Lorenzen, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, entered an appearance.

Carol Iancu, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, argued the cause for State and Environmental Intervenors in support of respondents. With her on the briefs were Martha Coakley, Attorney General, William L. Pardee, Attorney Assistant General, Sean H. Donahue, Howard I. Fox, David S. Baron, Megan Ceronsky, Vickie L. Patton, Peter Zalzal, Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of California, Kathleen A. Kenealy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Marc N. Melnick and Nicholas Stern, Deputy Attorneys General, Joseph R. Biden, III, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Delaware, Valerie M. Satterfield, Deputy Attorney General, George Jepsen, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Kimberly P. Massicotte, Matthew I. Levine, Scott N. Koschwitz, Assistant Attorneys General, Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Illinois, Gerald T. Karr, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Iowa, David R. Sheridan, Assistant Attorney General, Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Mary E. Raivel, Assistant Attorney General, Michael A. Delaney, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of New Hampshire, K. Allen Brooks, Senior Assistant Attorney General, William J. Schneider, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Maine, Gerald D. Reid, Assistant Attorney General, Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Minnesota, Jocelyn F. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, Gary K. King, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of New Mexico, Stephen R. Farris, Assistant Attorney General, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of New York, Michael J. Myers and Yueh–Ru Chu, Assistant Attorneys General, John Kroger, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Oregon, Paul Logan, Assistant Attorney–in–Charge, Robert M. McKenna, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Washington, Leslie R. Seffern, Assistant Attorney General, Peter F. Kilmartin, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island, Gregory S. Schultz, Special Assistant Attorney General, William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Vermont, Thea J. Schwartz, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher King, Assistant Corporation Counsel, Corporation Counsel for the City Of New York, Ann B. Weeks, Helen D. Silver, David Doniger, Meleah Geertsma, Morgan Butler, Frank W. Rambo, Joseph Mendelson III, Craig Holt Segall, and Joanne Spalding.

Deborah Sivas, Douglas A. Ruley, Edward Lloyd, and Susan J. Kraham were on the brief for amici curiae America's Great Waters Coalition, et al. in support of respondent. James K. Thornton entered an appearance.

Jonathan F. Mitchell, Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, argued the cause for State Petitioners and Supporting Intervenor. With him on the briefs were Gregg Abbott, Attorney General, Bill Cobb, Deputy Attorney General, J. Reed Clay, Jr., Special Assistant and Senior Counsel to the Attorney General, Michael P. Murphy and James P. Sullivan, Assistant Solicitors General, Luther Strange, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Alabama, Herman Robinson, Donald Trahan, Kathy M. Wright, Gary C. Rikard, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
63 cases
  • EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, No. 11-1302
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • August 21, 2012
    ... ... The Rule limits emissions from upwind States' coal- and natural gas-fired power plants, among other sources. Those power ... EPA, No. 10-1079 (D.C. Cir. July 17, 2012); ATK Launch Systems, Inc. v. EPA, 669 F.3d 330 (D.C. Cir. 2012); NRDC v. EPA, 661 F.3d 662 (D.C ... areas that EPA modeling predicted would not attain, or absent regulation would not maintain, the NAAQS. Transport Rule, 76 Fed. Reg. at 48,236. An ... Because the upwind States are responsible for the downwind State's exceeding the NAAQS by 50 units, the downwind ... ...
  • State v. Envtl. Prot. Agency
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • July 26, 2013
    ... ... 1438, 167 L.Ed.2d 248 (2007). Last year, in Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. EPA, 684 F.3d 102 (D.C.Cir.2012) ( Coalition ), this ... ...
  • Alon Ref. Krotz Springs, Inc. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 16-1052
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • August 30, 2019
    ... ... Petitioners"—seek review of EPA's decision not to revise its 2010 point of obligation regulation requiring refineries and importers, but not blenders, to bear the direct compliance obligation of ... Cir. 2013), and "the occurrence of an event that ripens a claim," Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. EPA , 684 F.3d 102, 129 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (per curiam). In cases like these—where, ... ...
  • Halbig v. Burwell
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • July 22, 2014
    ... ... section 36B, appellants challenge the regulation under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), ... entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 ... review of the record, we will uphold an agency action unless we find it to be ‘arbitrary, ... See Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co., 534 U.S. 438, 461, 122 S.Ct. 941, 151 ... See Coal. for Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. EPA, 684 F.3d 102, 137 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 firm's commentaries
17 books & journal articles
  • International Climate Action Without Congress: Does §115 of the Clean Air Act Provide Sufficient Authority?
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 44-7, July 2014
    • July 1, 2014
    ...1472, 15 ELR 20748 (D.D.C. 1985). 64. See Appendix B, for a discussion of New York v. Dzomas . 65. See Coal. for Responsible Reg. v. EPA, 684 F.3d 102, 121 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (“EPA had before it substantial record evidence that anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases ‘very likely’ caused w......
  • Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Freight
    • United States
    • Legal pathways to deep decarbonization in the United States Part IV - Energy Efficiency, Conservation, and Fuel Switching in Transportation
    • March 24, 2019
    ...to light-duty vehicles. his inding was upheld by the D.C. Circuit in Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. Environmental Prot. Agency, 684 F.3d 102 (D.C. Cir. 2012), af’d in relevant part by Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Prot. Agency, 134 S. Ct. 2427 (2014). 233. See CAA, ......
  • Unlocking Willpower and Ambition to Meet the Goals of the Paris Climate Change Agreement (Part Two): The Potential for Legal Reform and Revision
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 47-2, February 2017
    • February 1, 2017
    ...Fed. Reg. 66496 (Dec. 15, 2009) (Endangerment Finding), af’d , Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. Environmental Prot. Agency, 684 F.3d 102, 42 ELR 20141 (D.C. Cir. 2012), af’d in part and rev’d in part on other grounds sub nom. Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Prot. ......
  • Judge Garland's Environmental Decisions
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 46-7, July 2016
    • July 1, 2016
    ...ultimately resolved the dispute: *Texas v. EPA, 726 F.3d 180, 43 ELR 20170 (D.C. Cir. 2013); *Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. EPA, 684 F.3d 102, 42 ELR 20141 (D.C. Cir. 2012); *EME Homer City Generation, LP v. EPA, 696 F.3d 7, 42 ELR 20177 (D.C. Cir. 2012); New Jersey v. EPA, 517 F.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT